Abstract:Although complex machine learning models (eg, random forest, neural networks) are commonly outperforming the traditional and simple interpretable models (eg, linear regression, decision tree), in the healthcare domain, clinicians find it hard to understand and trust these complex models due to the lack of intuition and explanation of their predictions. With the new general data protection regulation (GDPR), the importance for plausibility and verifiability of the predictions made by machine learning models has become essential. Hence, interpretability techniques for machine learning models are an area focus of research. In general, the main aim of these interpretability techniques is to shed light and provide insights into the prediction process of the machine learning models and to be able to explain how the results from the prediction was generated. A major problem in this context is that both the quality of the interpretability techniques and trust of the machine learning model predictions are challenging to measure. In this article, we propose four fundamental quantitative measures for assessing the quality of interpretability techniques—similarity, bias detection, execution time, and trust. We present a comprehensive experimental evaluation of six recent and popular local model agnostic interpretability techniques, namely, LIME, SHAP, Anchors, LORE, ILIME" and MAPLE on different types of real‐world healthcare data. Building on previous work, our experimental evaluation covers different aspects for its comparison including identity, stability, separability, similarity, execution time, bias detection, and trust. The results of our experiments show that MAPLE achieves the highest performance for the identity across all data sets included in this study, while LIME achieves the lowest performance for the identity metric. LIME achieves the highest performance for the separability metric across all data sets. On average, SHAP has the smallest average time to output explanation across all data sets included in this study. For detecting the bias, SHAP and MAPLE enable the participants to better detect the bias. For the trust metric, Anchors achieves the highest performance on all data sets included in this work.

Understanding Model Predictions: A Comparative Analysis of SHAP and LIME on Various ML Algorithms

Local Interpretable Model Agnostic Shap Explanations for machine learning models

A Perspective on Explainable Artificial Intelligence Methods: SHAP and LIME

Predictability and Comprehensibility in Post-Hoc XAI Methods: A User-Centered Analysis

A novel approach to explain the black-box nature of machine learning in compressive strength predictions of concrete using Shapley additive explanations (SHAP)

Interpretability and Transparency of Machine Learning in File Fragment Analysis with Explainable Artificial Intelligence

A Comparative Analysis of Model Agnostic Techniques for Explainable Artificial Intelligence

Model-Agnostic Interpretability of Machine Learning

Explainable AI for Intrusion Detection Systems: LIME and SHAP Applicability on Multi-Layer Perceptron

A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions

Practical guide to SHAP analysis: Explaining supervised machine learning model predictions in drug development

Explainable Machine Learning Prediction for the Academic Performance of Deaf Scholars

"Why Should You Trust My Explanation?" Understanding Uncertainty in LIME Explanations

Evaluating Explainable Methods for Predictive Process Analytics: A Functionally-Grounded Approach

An Empirical Study of Model-Agnostic Techniques for Defect Prediction Models

Interpreting artificial intelligence models: a systematic review on the application of LIME and SHAP in Alzheimer's disease detection

Generative Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations

Comparative analysis of explainable machine learning prediction models for hospital mortality

Explaining Predictions from Machine Learning Models: Algorithms, Users, and Pedagogy

Interpretability in healthcare: A comparative study of local machine learning interpretability techniques

Analyzing Machine Learning Models for Credit Scoring with Explainable AI and Optimizing Investment Decisions