Abstract:The aim of this article is to provide a critical account for the ontological consequences of “new materialism” in sociology. The author explicates the context of the emergence of “new materialism”. In juxtaposition of materialism in mainstream sociology and social constructivism, “new materialism” significantly extends the sphere of materialistic analysis. It looks at the matter not as a pure container of the form, a pure passivity, but is rewarded with the features of energetism, vitalism and generative capacities. The author discloses the content of “new materialism” through reference to its three requirements: the processuality, eventfulness of the material world; the single nature-culture continuum; the extension of the capacity to act to non-human objects. In sum, all these requirements provide presuppositions for the “flat ontology” of assemblages that is opposed to mainstream sociology. The latter, with its principles of essentialism, reductionism and deontology of objects, postulates the existence of autonomous and self-sufficient sociality. In contrast, in new materialistic ontology none of the substances can be taken as an essence of the social, which entails the affirmation of the heterogeneity and multiplicity of the social. Heterogeneous assemblages appear as a primary ontological unit. Erosion of the social, its ontological devaluation as a separate sphere of reality, leads to the fact that notions of the social and social ontology become problematic. The article reveals ontological dead ends in the identification of assemblages and in the description of their social and materialistic content. The possibility of assemblage identification shows that ontologization of multiplicity can be only a new version of essentialism. The argument of the article is that there are three interpretations of assemblages, distinguished in terms of their material and social content. The first one allows the existence of matter out of social forms, but denies the possibility of its cognition and thus restores the dualism of matter-in-itself and matter-for-ourselves, of nature and society. The second one denies the existence of matter out of social forms, but thus becomes anthropocentric, which contradicts to the initial requirements of “new materialism”. The third interpretation is based on the idea of the independence of matter from social forms, but in such a version “new materialism” does not differ from mainstream sociology. The ontological dead ends of the “new materialism” bare the alternative between the disciplinary and post-disciplinary identities of sociology in the situation of a dynamic and relational social reality.

Badiou’s Social Ontology: Another Theory of the Subject

The Social Ontology of Alain Badiou’s Being and Event

Against instinctual reason: Alain Badiou on the disinterested interest of truth procedures in the post-truth era

Alain Badiou's Mistake: Two Postulates of Dialectic Materialism

Alain Badiou and Education

Alain Badiou, the Communist Horizon Beyond Violence. An Exploratory Look at the 21st Century

Conceptualization of the Social within Sociological Knowledge:Doxa and Bourdieu's sociological knowledge theory

Two approaches to naturalistic social ontology

Grounding Ontology of the “International” in Terms of Radical Constructivism

Badiou's Study on the Way of Human Existence—— from the Perspective of Radical Political Philosophy

Simondon Contra New Materialism: Political Anthropology Reloaded

From Revolutionary Proletariat to “Inexistence” in Event---The Evolution of Subject in Post-War French Marxism

"Subject - object" Relations in Humanities

Capital, Logic of the World

Beyond the Digital Public Sphere: Towards a Political Ontology of Algorithmic Technologies

Fichte, Le Sujet Et L’ontologie Sociale

Bourdieu, Language and “Determinism”: A Reply to Simon Susen

On the Question of Subjectivity in Marx's Philosopy

“New Materialism” in Sociology: Ontological Consequences

“The Real is Relational”: An Epistemological Analysis of Pierre Bourdieu's Generative Structuralism

Enactive Cognition and the Other: Enactivism and Levinas Meet Halfway