Abstract:This paper evaluates the thermo-economics of power-to-chemicals using solar energy, with the chemicals being methane, methanol, and gasoline. In addition to the optimal technology sizing and heat cascade utilization, this paper also considers the optimal molten-salt solar power tower (MSPT) design, as the MSPT significantly affects the levelized product cost. A bi-level optimization is proposed, employing mixed-integer linear programming at the lower level with heat and mass integration for optimizing sizes and operating strategies of technologies, and with heat cascade utilization and a genetic algorithm at the upper level for optimizing the MSPT design. In the upper level, the full-load storage hours, design direct normal irradiance, solar multiple, and sizes of the MSPT are optimized. The electricity sources considered are the MSPT, photovoltaic (PV) with daily electricity storage, and the electrical grid as a complementary technology to satisfy the targeted daily product demand. Cost-competitiveness of solar-driven chemical synthesis is thoroughly assessed via considering sensitivity analysis on 1) regional solar resource endowments and actual local demands; 2) electricity sources, that is, PV vs. MSPT; and 3) the scale effect represented by different chemicals’ yield. The results show that the levelized methane cost ranges from 4.5 to 8.5 €/kg, depending on the location, plant size, and annual power contribution of concentrated solar power. Due to the larger mass production, the levelized cost of methanol and gasoline is lower: 1.5–2.2 €/kg for methanol and 4–6 €/kg for gasoline. The findings highlight the significance of location choice, that is, natural endowment of solar radiation and carbon sources. Using the syngas co-electrolysis pathway and direct solar radiation 100 kWh/m 2 higher, the methane production cost is decreased by 2.4 €/kg. Sensitivity analysis performed on plant scale reveals that a compact, small-scale system is far too expensive. The levelized cost of methane could be decreased by 1.2 €/kg when the plant is scaled up from 4,000 to 20,000 kg/day H 2 . Due to its expensive electricity storage and limited working hours, PV is typically not chosen as a power source. Overall, solar fuels are unlikely to be cost-competitive in the near future when compared to market prices for all three compounds under consideration.

Cost-optimal Power-to-Methanol: Flexible operation or intermediate storage?

Dynamic-cycle Simulation of Power-to-methanol-to-power System with Reversible Solid Oxide Cells: Multi-physics and Techno-Economic Analysis

Techno-economic Analysis and Optimization of a Novel Hybrid Solar-Wind-bioethanol Hydrogen Production System Via Membrane Reactor

Data-driven robust optimization for optimal scheduling of power to methanol

Power-to-methanol: The role of process flexibility in the integration of variable renewable energy into chemical production

A Combined Investment and Operational Optimization Approach for Power-to-Methanol Plants

Strategies for flexible operation of power-to-X processes coupled with renewables

Multi-Period Supply Chain Design and Optimization for Modular Methanol Production Driven by Renewable Energy

Energy Optimization and Economic Study of an Energy Storage System Based on a Carbon Dioxide-to-methanol Process

Optimization of Hybrid Power Plants: When Is a Detailed Electrolyzer Model Necessary?

Techno-economic study of a zero-emission methanol based energy storage system

Operation Strategy for an Integrated Energy System Considering the Slow Dynamic Response Characteristics of Power-to-Gas Conversion

Thermo-economic evaluation and optimization of solar-driven power-to-chemical systems with thermal, electricity, and chemical storage

Optimization of hydrogen supply from renewable electricity including cavern storage

Optimizing hydrogen and e-methanol production through Power-to-X integration in biogas plants

Integrated e-Methanol and Drop-in Fuels Hydrothermal Liquefaction Platform-Techno-Economic and GHG Emissions Assessment for Grid-Connected Plants under Flexible BECCU(S) Operation

Multi-variable optimization of a geothermal power plant integrated with water electrolyzer and methanol production

Capacity Optimization of Distributed Photovoltaic Hydrogen Production and Hydrogenation Electrochemical Energy Storage Integrated Station

Flexible and efficient renewable-power-to-methane concept enabled by liquid CO 2 energy storage: Optimization with power allocation and storage sizing

Green Methanol—An Important Pathway to Realize Carbon Neutrality

Cost Optimized Scheduling in Modular Electrolysis Plants