Racial Disparities in Future Development of Lethal Prostate Cancer Based on Midlife Baseline Prostate‐Specific Antigen

Giuseppe Chiarelli,Matthew Davis,Alex Stephens,Marco Finati,Giuseppe Ottone Cirulli,Chase Morrison,Akshay Sood,Giuseppe Carrieri,Alberto Briganti,Francesco Montorsi,Giovanni Lughezzani,Nicolò Buffi,Craig Rogers,Firas Abdollah
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.24834
2024-12-11
The Prostate
Abstract:Background Previous studies found that Midlife Baseline PSA (MB PSA) predicts the risk of developing lethal prostate cancer (PCa), although the cohorts were homogenous in terms of racial compositions. We aimed to investigate racial disparities in the predictive value of MB PSA for lethal PCa in a diverse, contemporary, North American population. Methods Our cohort included White and Black men aged 40–59 years, who underwent MB PSA through our health system. Cumulative incidence curves depicted lethal PCa stratified by race and MB PSA above/below the median. We utilized time‐dependent Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves and Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) to compare the performance of MB PSA in predicting lethal PCa based on race. Multivariable regression (MVA) was used to examine the impact of the MB PSA in predicting lethal PCa by race. Results We included 112,967 men, of whom 27% were Black. The cumulative incidence estimate with MB PSA values equal to the median at 15 years of follow‐up was 0.13 (0.04, 0.32) for White men and 0.55 (0.24, 1.11) for Black men. AUCs comparison showed no statistically significant differences in the predictive role of MB PSA for lethal PCa between White and Black men. At MVA, using White patients with PSA ≤ median as the reference group, the HR of lethal PCa for White men with PSA > median aged 40–44, 45–49, 50–54, and 55–59 was respectively 2.98 (1.59–5.57), 3.01 (1.89–4.81), 5.10 (3.38–7.70), and 3.38 (2.32–4.92). While for Black men was respectively 5.50 (2.94–10.27), 4.19 (2.59–6.78), 9.79 (6.37–15.04), and 7.53 (5.03–11.26) (all p
endocrinology & metabolism,urology & nephrology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?