Abstract:Objective: Total endovascular repair of aortic arch aneurysms is feasible in select patients. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and early outcomes of total endovascular arch repair using 3-vessel company-manufactured devices (CMDs) and physician-modified endo grafts (PMEGs). Methods: Patients unfit for open repair who underwent 3-vessel total arch repair at a single institution from 2018 to 2021 were reviewed. Patients received either 3-vessel inner-branch CMDs or PMEGs. Three-vessel designs were used to incorporate the innominate, left common carotid, and left subclavian arteries. The antegrade inner branches in both devices were accessed via right brachial or carotid approach. The left carotid was accessed via carotid cutdown or femoral approach. The left subclavian artery was accessed via transfemoral approach. The study endpoints included procedural technical success, patient survival, neurologic events, cardiac complications, reinterventions, and target artery patency. Results: Nine patients underwent treatment. Four patients were treated with PMEGs, and 5 with CMDs. Procedural technical success was 100%. There were no in-hospital deaths. There were no strokes, transient ischemic attacks, myocardial infarction, or spinal ischemia in the perioperative period. Major adverse events occurred in 3 patients (33%). Two (22%) vascular access complications and one (11%) acute kidney injury occurred. One (11%) patient required early reintervention for an access complication. The median follow-up period was 358 days (CMD, 392 days; PMEG, 198 days). There was a late reintervention and conversion to open repair at 142 days of follow-up in a patient with a PMEG that developed an aortic infection, leading to death on postoperative day 239. The mean length of stay was 7±4 days. Computed tomography imaging obtained during the immediate postoperative period revealed endoleak in 6 (66%) patients, out of which 5 resolved spontaneously and 1 required reintervention via left subclavian artery stenting. Target artery patency was 100% at the end of the follow-up period. Conclusions: Three-vessel total endovascular aortic arch repair using a CMD or PMEG is feasible with optimal early outcomes. Physician-modified stent-grafts are a feasible option for patients who do not meet anatomic criteria for CMDs. Clinical impact: Management of aortic arch disease remains a significant challenge in vascular surgery. This study showcases the feasibility and safety of using a total endovascular approach to repair the aortic arch, which could potentially reduce morbidity and mortality associated with traditional surgical approaches. The results suggest that this minimally invasive technique could be an alternative treatment option for high-risk patients and could significantly improve outcomes for those requiring aortic arch repair. Overall, this study represents a promising development in the field of endovascular surgery and highlights the potential to improve patient outcomes.

Endovascular reconstruction of the aortic arch with new-generation dual-branch and triple-branch endograft: design, applicability, indications, outcomes, and future directions

Technical tips and clinical experience with the Nexus Endospan arch branch stent-graft

Total Endovascular Aortic Arch Repair: From Dream to Reality

[Progress on in Situ Fenestration During Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair].

Endovascular Management of Aortic Arch Diseases: Current Status and Future Trends

The Development of Totally Percutaneous Aortic Arch Repair With Inner-Branch Endografts: Experience From 2 Centers

Fenestrated endovascular repair for diseases involving the aortic arch

Three-Dimensional Printing to Guide the Application of Modified Prefenestrated Stent Grafts to Treat Aortic Arch Disease

Hybrid and Endovascular Management of Aortic Arch Pathology

Hybrid Approach to Management of Complex Aortic Arch Pathologies: A Single-Center Experience in China

"Hybrid" Approach for the Treatment of Aortic Arch Aneurysm.

Early Results and Feasibility of Total Endovascular Aortic Arch Repair Using 3-Vessel Company-Manufactured and Physician-Modified Stent-Grafts

Surgical treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of type B aortic dissection involving the aortic arch

Total Endovascular Aortic Arch Repair With Branched Devices: 7-Year Experience

Endovascular Repair for Aortic Arch Aneurysm: Current Study Status

Endovascular Treatment for Aortic Arch Pathologies: Chimney, On-the-table Fenestration, and In-Situ Fenestration Techniques.

Minimally Invasive Endovascular Repair for Nondissected Ascending Aortic Disease: A Systematic Review

Outcomes after Endovascular Arch Repair in Patients with a Mechanical Aortic Valve: Results from a Multicentre Study

Aortic Arch Innovation: Branching Out By Branching In?

Editor's Choice - Sex Related Anatomical Differences in Patients With Aortic Arch Pathology and Their Impact on the Feasibility of Double and Triple Branched Endografts

Endovascular Treatment of Arch and Proximal Thoracic Aortic Lesions