Abstract:The precursory scale increase (Ψ) phenomenon describes the sudden increase in rate and magnitude in a precursory area AP, at precursor time TP, and with precursor magnitude MP prior to the upcoming large earthquake with magnitude Mm. Scaling relations between the Ψ variables form the basis of the "Every Earthquake a Precursor According to Scale" (EEPAS) earthquake forecasting model. EEPAS is a well‐established space–time point process model that forecasts large earthquakes in the medium term, that is, the coming months to decades, depending on Mm. In Aotearoa New Zealand, EEPAS contributes to hybrid models for public earthquake forecasting and to the source model of time‐varying seismic hazard models, including the latest revision of the National Seismic Hazard Model. The Ψ phenomenon was recently shown not to be unique for a given earthquake, with smaller precursory areas AP associated with larger precursor times TP and vice versa. This trade‐off between AP and TP has also been found for the spatial and temporal distributions of the EEPAS models. Detailed analysis of the Ψ phenomenon has so far been limited by the manual and labor‐intensive procedure of identifying Ψ in earthquake catalogs. Here, we introduce two algorithms to automatically detect Ψ and apply them to real and simulated earthquake catalog data. By randomizing the catalog and removing aftershocks, we confirm that the Ψ phenomenon is a feature of space–time earthquake clustering prior to major earthquakes. Multiple Ψ identifications confirm the trade‐off between AP and TP, and the scaling relations for both real and simulated catalogs are consistent with the original scaling relations on which EEPAS is based. We identify opportunities for future work to refine the algorithms and apply them to physics‐based simulated catalogs to enhance the understanding of Ψ. A better understanding of Ψ has the potential to improve forecasting of large upcoming earthquakes.

Is Earthquake Triggering Driven by Small Earthquakes?

Constraints on the Size of the Smallest Triggering Earthquake from the ETAS Model, Baath's Law, and Observed Aftershock Sequences

Fault size–dependent fracture energy explains multiscale seismicity and cascading earthquakes

Fault-size dependent fracture energy explains multi-scale seismicity and cascading earthquakes

Modelling the Effect of Fault Geometry on Earthquake Triggering

Earthquakes big and small: same physics, different boundary conditions

Systematic Assessment of the Static Stress-Triggering Hypothesis using Inter-earthquake Time Statistics

Verifying the magnitude dependence in earthquake occurrence

Exploring the relationship between the magnitudes of seismic events

Algorithmic Identification of the Precursory Scale Increase Phenomenon in Earthquake Catalogs

Evolution of induced earthquakes from dimensionless scaling

Condensation of earthquake location distributions: Optimal spatial information encoding and application to multifractal analysis of South Californian seismicity

Model for triggering of non-volcanic tremor by earthquakes

Universal Earthquake-Occurrence Jumps, Correlations with Time, and Anomalous Diffusion

Informative Modes of Seismicity in Nearest‐Neighbor Earthquake Proximities

Anomalous Power Law Distribution of Total Lifetimes of Branching Processes Relevant to Earthquakes

Seismic magnitude clustering is prevalent in field and laboratory catalogs

Power Law Distributions of Offspring and Generation Numbers in Branching Models of Earthquake Triggering

Recurrence Statistics of Great Earthquakes

Are the magnitudes of earthquakes in Southern California, with incompleteness removed, correlated?