Abstract:The differences between online and traditional learning are evident considering many important factors. The study of Al-Maroof et al (2021) reveals that students prefer online learning platforms depending on the content appropriate to their skills and abilities and on the quality of the platform thus meeting their expectations and satisfaction. Zheng (2021) also argues that online learning becomes an avenue for students’ self-directed learning. Moreover, Pan (2020) emphasizes that students' technology self-efficacy influences their self-directed learning, and according to Grande et al (2022) and Anette (2018) intrinsic motivation plays a big role in the student’s self-directed learning. In contrast to traditional university students, students learning online have a high correlation between self-directed learning (SDL) and academic performance. Using SDL as a teaching strategy can help students become more adept at controlling their own teaching-learning process (Khalid et al, 2020). Hence, the researcher was motivated to conduct a study to determine the level of technological self-efficacy, learning motivation, and self-directed learning of selected senior high school students of the University of Perpetual Help System –JONELTA and the relationship of each variable. The findings of this study could serve as a guide for senior high school students for them to realize their technological self-efficacy and the importance of learning motivation to their ability to self-direct their learning and a great significance in the field of education specifically policy makers and curriculum designers of Department of Education, administrators, school principals and senior high school teachers might use as reference for the outcomes in assessing blended learning in private academic institution in order to decide whether or not this modern trend in instruction is viable for other public schools. The researcher utilized the descriptive-correlational method of research using survey questionnaire in gathering data. Statistical method utilized to give credence and reliability to the work. The findings show in terms of level of technological self-efficacy, the average weighted mean of 3.97 revealed that the respondents’ level of technological self-efficacy is high. Meanwhile, for learning motivation, the average weighted mean of 4.10 revealed that the respondents’ have high level of learning motivation in terms of control of learning beliefs (4.23), goal orientation and task value (4.18), intrinsic goal orientation (4.10), teacher support (4.08) and social engagement (3.94. Moreover, the average weighted mean of 4.03 revealed that the respondents had a high level of self-directed learning. An average weighted mean of 4.03 revealed that the respondents have a high level of self-directed learning. Meanwhile, for the relationship between technological self-efficacy, learning motivation and self-directed learning, the findings showed that there was a multiple correlation between the respondents’ level of technological self-efficacy, level of learning motivation, and level of self-directed learning. A value of 0.000 indicated a high level of prediction of the dependent variable (level of self-directed learning). The obtained r square of 0.670 shows that independent variables (technological self-efficacy and learning motivation) explain 67% of the variability of the dependent variable (level of self-directed learning). Further, the ANOVA shows that the independent variables, technological self-efficacy and learning motivation, are significant predictors of the dependent variable, self-directed learning with an F-value of 86.892 and a probability value of 0.000 which is less than the 0.05 significance level. Based on the findings of the study, the following conclusion are drawn: the respondents’ level of technological self-efficacy is high; the respondents are highly motivated to learn which means students are open to learning and participation in the class and the students’ level of self-directed learning is high. Moreover, the higher the students’ technological self-efficacy, the higher their level of learning motivation; the higher the level of students’ learning motivation, the higher the level of their self-directed learning. The higher the level of the students’ technological self-efficacy, the higher the level of their self-directed learning. Finally, technological self-efficacy and learning motivation in terms of intrinsic goal orientation, extrinsic goal orientation, control of learning belief, self-efficacy, task value, and social engagement are significant predictors of the student self-directed learning.

A comparative analysis of blended learning and traditional instruction: Effects on academic motivation and learning outcomes

Blended learning effectiveness: the relationship between student characteristics, design features and outcomes

The Effect of Blended Learning Environment-based, Flipped Classroom Practice on College Students' Learning Performance

IMPACT OF BLENDED LEARNING ON ACQUISITION OF ENGLISH AS SECOND LANGUAGE AT UNDERGRADUATE LEVEL IN PAKISTAN

Investigating the motivating factors that influence the adoption of blended learning for teachers' professional development

Technological Self-efficacy, Learning Motivation, and Selfdirected Learning of Selected Senior High School Students in a Blended Learning Environment

Evaluating the effectiveness of blended learning using the ARCS model

Learning-Teaching Aspects of Blended Learning among Nursing Students at Faculty of Nursing

Gender-Wise Perception of Students Towards Blended Learning in Higher Education: Pakistan

Motivate students for better academic achievement: A systematic review of blended innovative teaching and its impact on learning

The Impact of Blended Learning Environment on Academic Achievement of Engineering Students

Blended Learning Compared to Traditional Learning in Medical Education: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Effects of blended learning on undergraduate nursing students' knowledge, skill, critical thinking ability and mental health: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The impacts of learning motivation, emotional engagement and psychological capital on academic performance in a blended learning university course

The Effectiveness of Online and Blended Learning: A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature

Does Blended Learning Improve Student’s Learning Independence during the Covid-19 Pandemic? Evidence from a Labuhanbatu University, North Sumatera

Nursing students' perceptions on motivation strategies to enhance academic achievement through blended learning: A qualitative study

Effects of blended learning pedagogical practices on students’ motivation and autonomy for the teaching of short stories in upper secondary English

Optimizing Strategies for Enhanced Effectiveness in Blended Learning Models

Effect of blended self-directed learning on nursing students: Quasi-experimental approach

The Application of Blended Learning with a Community Science Technology Approach to Improve Student Learning Outcomes in Higher Education