Abstract:Background: Although interest in outcomes-based risk-sharing agreements (OBRSAs) and other value-based contracts (VBCs) continues to grow, the number of VBCs in the United States is still limited. A better understanding of the evolving and fluid context of policies, regulations, and operational factors affecting their uptake in the United States is needed in order to lower or obviate barriers and advance OBRSAs. Objectives: To (a) identify and recognize priorities among policies, regulations, and other factors that are most likely to influence the feasibility, design, and execution of OBRSAs and (b) suggest opportunities for reform and other modifications that may advance OBRSAs in the United States. Methods: Across 18 months during 2017-2018, we reviewed health policy literature, examined stakeholder group communications, and conducted semistructured interviews with representatives of 12 diverse stakeholder organizations. Across these, and incorporating real-time contextual changes, we identified priorities for enabling and improving OBRSAs. Results: Regulatory and policy priorities most often cited by manufacturers were Medicaid best price rule, Medicare Part B average sales pricing, FDA restrictions on communications, and the Anti-Kickback Statute. While recognizing these, health plans were more concerned about operational barriers, particularly associated with data collection and analysis, selection of outcomes that are feasible to assess, bandwidth for managing OBRSAs, and implementation costs relative to return on investment. Most recognized limitations on access to personal health information, target population turnover, and insufficient information sharing of OBRSA experiences. Noteworthy were asymmetries of administrative burden and cost management: individual manufacturers may pursue OBRSAs for 1 or a few products per year, while health plans are approached by multiple manufacturers about OBRSAs for their respective products; manufacturers focus on drugs, while health plans must manage broader costs of care. Conclusions: While all stakeholders express interest in OBRSAs, health plans tend to consider them as a narrower priority than manufacturers. Solving operational barriers, in addition to addressing policy and regulatory barriers, is essential for aligning efforts to advance OBRSAs. Doing so depends on collaboration to improve decisions about when and how to pursue OBRSAs, with attention to data management, modeling and piloting OBRSAs, and information sharing. These findings pertain to companies operating in the United States and some likely extend to certain value-based arrangements in other countries. Disclosures: This analysis was funded by Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD), a subsidiary of Merck, as a component of the Learning Laboratory for Advancing Value-Based Healthcare, which is a multiyear collaboration of MSD and Optum, a health services, technology, and data company. The manuscript underwent an internal review by the sponsor. The Lewin Group (Lewin) is a subsidiary of OptumServe. OptumServe is wholly owned by UnitedHealth Group (UHG). Neither OptumServe nor UHG or its subsidiaries review the work products of Lewin. Lewin operates with editorial independence and provides its clients with health care and human services policy research and consulting services. Goodman and Villarivera are employees of Lewin; Gregor is an employee of Optum; and van Bavel is an employee of MSD. Goodman and Villarivera report fees from UHG, unrelated to this study. A poster presentation based on this manuscript was accepted and presented at the ISPOR Europe 2018 Conference in Barcelona, Spain, on November 13, 2018.

Key Opinion Leaders' Interviews to Inform the Future of Benefit–Risk Planning in the Medical Total Product Life Cycle of Global Pharmaceutical and Medical Device Organizations

A Structured Benefit-Risk Assessment Operating Model for Investigational Medicinal Products in the Pharmaceutical Industry

A Survey to Assess the Current Status of Structured Benefit-Risk Assessment in the Global Drug and Medical Device Industry

Patients' and Physicians' Beliefs and Attitudes towards Integrating Personalized Risk Estimates into Patient Education about Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy

Facilitation Or Hindrance: Physicians' Perception On Best Practice Alerts (Bpa) Usage In An Electronic Health Record System

Personalising treatment plan quality review with knowledge-based planning in the TROG 15.03 trial for stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy in primary kidney cancer

A proposal for using benefit-risk methods to improve the prominence of adverse event results when reporting trials

Opportunities and challenges for the inclusion of patient preferences in the medical product life cycle: a systematic review

Design, Conduct, and Use of Patient Preference Studies in the Medical Product Life Cycle: A Multi-Method Study

Impact of personalized risk scores on shared decision making in left ventricular assist device implantation: Findings from a qualitative study

Challenges and Opportunities for Companies to Build HTA/Payer Perspectives Into Drug Development Through the Use of a Dynamic Target Product Profile

Advancing patient-centric care: integrating patient reported outcomes for tolerability assessment in early phase clinical trials - insights from an expert virtual roundtable

Understanding the role of opinion leaders in improving clinical effectiveness

The Role of Medical Societies and the Relevance of Clinical Perspective in the Evolving EU HTA Process: Insights Generated at the 2023 Fall Convention and Survey of the European Access Academy

Patient and public involvement in preclinical and medical research: Evaluation of an established programme in a Discovery‐Based Medical Research Institute

Evaluating Medical Devices in Nephrology Using Patient-Reported Outcome and Experience Measures

In risk we trust? Making decisions about knee replacement

Regulatory, Policy, and Operational Considerations for Outcomes-Based Risk-Sharing Agreements in the U.S. Market: Opportunities for Reform

Planning for Patient-Reported Outcome Implementation: Development of Decision Tools and Practical Experience Across Four Clinics

Current status and trends in performance-based risk-sharing arrangements between healthcare payers and medical product manufacturers

Outcomes-Based Pricing and Reimbursement Arrangements for Pharmaceutical Products in the Us and Eu-5: Payer and Manufacturer Experience and Outlook