Abstract:With the recent advent of artificially intelligent pairing partners in software engineering, it is interesting to renew the study of the psychology of pairing. Pair programming provides an attractive way of teaching software engineering to university students. Its study can also lead to a better understanding of the needs of professional software engineers in various programming roles and for the improvement of the concurrent pairing software. Objective: This preliminary study aimed to gain quantitative and qualitative insights into pair programming, especially students' attitudes towards its specific roles and what they require from the pairing partners. The research's goal is to use the findings to design further studies on pairing with artificial intelligence. Method: Using a mixed-methods and experimental approach, we distinguished the effects of the pilot, navigator, and solo roles on (N = 35) students' intrinsic motivation. Four experimental sessions produced a rich data corpus in two software engineering university classrooms. It was quantitatively investigated using the Shapiro-Wilk normality test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) to confirm the relations and significance of variations in mean intrinsic motivation in different roles. Consequently, seven semi-structured interviews were conducted with the experiment's participants. The qualitative data excerpts were subjected to the thematic analysis method in an essentialist way. Results: The systematic coding interview transcripts elucidated the research topic by producing seven themes for understanding the psychological aspects of pair programming and for its improvement in university classrooms. Statistical analysis of 612 self-reported intrinsic motivation inventories confirmed that students find programming in pilot-navigator roles more interesting and enjoyable than programming simultaneously.

Toward Artificial Intelligence-Human Paired Programming: A Review of the Educational Applications and Research on Artificial Intelligence Code-Generation Tools

Three Contrasting Pairs’ Collaborative Programming Processes in China’s Secondary Education

Is AI the better programming partner? Human-Human Pair Programming vs. Human-AI pAIr Programming

Pair Programming With Generative AI

Programming Is Hard -- Or at Least It Used to Be: Educational Opportunities And Challenges of AI Code Generation

Is Pair Programing in Higher Education a Good Strategy?

Empirical research on pair programming in higher education: a literature review

AI-Assisted Programming Tasks Using Code Embeddings and Transformers

AI-boosted Software Automation: Learning from Human Pair Programmers.

Exploring the Problems, their Causes and Solutions of AI Pair Programming: A Study on GitHub and Stack Overflow

Psychological Aspects of Pair Programming

Innovating Computer Programming Pedagogy: The AI-Lab Framework for Generative AI Adoption

Generative AI as a Tool or Leader? Exploring AI-Augmented Thinking in Student Programming Tasks

Effectiveness of Generative Artificial Intelligence in learning programming to higher education students

Advancing parallel programming integrating artificial intelligence for enhanced efficiency and automation

Benefits and Challenges of Collaboration between Students and Conversational Generative Artificial Intelligence in Programming Learning: An Empirical Case Study

Assessing Learning of Computer Programming Skills in the Age of Generative Artificial Intelligence.

A Pair Programming Framework for Code Generation Via Multi-Plan Exploration and Feedback-Driven Refinement

Expert or machine? Comparing the effect of pairing student teacher with in-service teacher and ChatGPT on their critical thinking, learning performance, and cognitive load in an integrated-STEM course

Rethinking Software Engineering in the Foundation Model Era: From Task-Driven AI Copilots to Goal-Driven AI Pair Programmers

Programming with AI: Evaluating ChatGPT, Gemini, AlphaCode, and GitHub Copilot for Programmers