Abstract:Since the 19th century, urban lawns have gradually taken center stage to become one of the main sources of greening in many cities around the world. The current published research on planting technology, maintenance techniques, the impact of lawn maintenance, preferences for manicured lawns and the biodiversity protection for historical lawns as topics, has developed and increased over time. However, what has been less researched is the relationship and interplay between the perceptions of urban residents and their use of urban lawns. More specifically, our research focused on the question of how residents view, socialize and utilize city lawns accessible to them. To provide some insight into this area of urban lawn use, our research study was conducted in Lund, Sweden a city that uses lawns as their main form of greening. To accomplish the study's objectives the city's lawns were grouped into the following categories:(1) park lawns, (2) residential neighborhood lawns, (3) lawns around public buildings, (4) lawns surrounding residential buildings, (5) lawns along greenways and (6) lawns along roads. By means of distributed open-ended questionnaires the researchers discovered two important findings. First, the socialization patterns and utilization of lawns differed between the six categories due to various factors which included the suitability of the land use. The data also showed that the efficiency of planting lawns in certain areas impacts the ability to access areas for socialization activities (i.e. roadsides and greenways). Secondly, the study revealed that the planting collocation and service facilities of lawns greatly influences residents' ability and opportunities for social interaction.Two other study findings were of interest namely that (1) the utilization of lawns among Lund's working class was somewhat lower than that of students; and (2) that socialization and use of lawns were not necessarily related to the user's accustomed environmental background. Subsequently, this article discusses key themes that include residents' attitudes, beliefs and opinions about the interaction of socializing and the meaning of those interactions in an urban environment. It is our purpose that this article spurs a more robust international dialogue about pragmatic lessons urban planners may learn about future designing efforts of urban green space in newly developing cities and established ones already confronting modern space and housing challenges.

ParkLIV – engaging non-users in green space management

Capturing residents' perceptions of green spaces in densifying urban landscapes - the potentials of mental mapping.

Understanding the benefits of public urban green space: How do perceptions vary between professionals and users?

Your Favourite Park Is Not My Favourite Park: A Participatory Geographic Information System Approach to Improving Urban Green and Blue Spaces—A Case Study in Edinburgh, Scotland

Public Attitudes about Urban Lawns:Social Opportunities Provided by Urban Lawns in Lund, Sweden

An integrated approach for urban green travel environments: Planning factors, benefits and barriers as perceived by users and planners

Urban greening co-creation: participatory spatial modelling to bridge data-driven and citizen-centred approaches

Governing for Child-Friendliness? Perspectives on Children as Users Among Swedish and Danish Urban Open Space Managers

Optimization of the location and design of urban green spaces

Participatory Design of Urban Green Spaces to Improve Residents' Health

Socially inclusive Lighting Design: exploring a method to enhance freedom of movement for marginalised groups.

Facilitating health promoting ideas and actions: participatory research in an underserved Swedish residential area

Transdisciplinary approaches assessing unmanaged urban green spaces reveal benefits for biodiversity and people

Contested representations of benefits of urban nature in a densifying marginalised neighbourhood

From landscapes of utopia to the margins of the green urban life

Greenery in urban morphology: a comparative analysis of differences in urban green space accessibility for various urban structures across European cities

What is known about what works in community-involved decision-making relating to urban green and blue spaces? A realist review protocol

Towards a “City in Nature”: Evaluating the Cultural Ecosystem Services Approach Using Online Public Participation GIS to Support Urban Green Space Management

Active recreational and silvicultural co-use of forested areas: an innovative forest management study

Lively Social Space, Well-Being Activity, and Urban Design: Findings From a Low-Cost Community-Led Public Space Intervention

Urban ecosystem services in strategic planning in Swedish municipalities