Equilibrium condition in Insurance Pricing: a particular case

Renato Ghisellini

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.math/9806127

1998-09-03

Abstract:Equilibrium pricing has been proven to underlie the rational Insured expectancy of premia additivity for composition of policies fully covering independent risks.

Probability,Pricing of Securities

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

OPTIMAL REINSURANCE UNDER EXPECTED VALUE PRINCIPLE

Cao Yusong,Zhang Yi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11766-006-0009-0

2006-01-01

Abstract:The paper concerns the problem how to purchase the reinsurance in order to make the insurer and the reinsurance company’s total risk to be least under the expected value principle. When the insurer and reinsurance company take arbitrary risk measures, sufficient conditions for optimality of reinsurance contract are given within the restricted class of admissible contracts. Further, the explicit forms of optimal reinsurance contract under several special risk measures are given, and the method to decide parameters as well.
Insurance policy value and Pareto-optimal retention in the hypothesis of rare loss events

Renato Ghisellini

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.math/9806030

1998-09-03

Abstract:In the hypothesis of rare loss events, the general expression of the policy value has been determined as a functional of the "expected frequency / loss severity" function and of the retention function. Exponential disutility has been chosen after mathematical characterization of some of its economical aspects, where functional properties of quasiarithmetic averages have been used. By means of variational techniques, in the case of a risk neutral Insurer the Pareto-optimal retention function has been finally determined.

Probability,Risk Management
Equilibrium reinsurance strategies for n insurers under a unified competition and cooperation framework

Peng Yang,Zhiping Chen,Xiangyu Cui

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03461238.2021.1918577

IF: 1.7821

2021-06-05

Scandinavian Actuarial Journal

Abstract:We propose a unified competition and cooperation framework for <i>n</i> insurers and investigate the resulting reinsurance game problem. Each insurer's surplus is assumed to be a diffusion process. Each insurer can purchase the proportional reinsurance to reduce his claim risk, and the reinsurance premium is determined via the variance value principle. The objective of each insurer is to find a reinsurance strategy so as to maximize the expected utility of his terminal payoff. We establish a Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman (HJB) equation and the corresponding verification theorem. Furthermore, we derive the explicit solutions for both the equilibrium reinsurance strategy and the value function by solving the HJB equation. Finally, numerical experiments are carried out to illustrate the influences of model parameters such as the size of a group, the number of groups on the equilibrium reinsurance strategy. The numerical results reveal some similarities and differences between the competition case and the cooperation case, and the detailed effects of different competition and cooperation patterns, which provide useful insights for reinsurance in reality.

social sciences, mathematical methods,mathematics, interdisciplinary applications,statistics & probability
Utility-based indifference pricing of pure endowments in a Markov-modulated market model

Alessandra Cretarola,Benedetta Salterini

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2301.13575

2023-01-31

Abstract:In this paper we study exponential utility indifference pricing of pure endowment policies in a stochastic-factor model for an insurance company, which can also invest in a financial market. Specifically, we propose a modeling framework where the hazard rate is described by an observable general diffusion process and the risky asset price evolves as a jump diffusion affected by a continuous-time finite-state Markov chain representing regimes of the economy. Using the classical stochastic control approach based on the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation, we describe the optimal investment strategies with and without the insurance derivative and characterize the indifference price in terms of a classical solution to a linear PDE. We also provide its probabilistic representation via an extension of the Feynman-Kac formula show that it satisfies a final value problem. Furthermore, we also discuss the indifference price for a portfolio of insurance policies and for a term life insurance. Finally, some numerical experiments are performed to address sensitivity analyses.

Portfolio Management
Ambiguity Aversion in Competitive Insurance Markets with Asymmetric Information

Richard Peter,Andreas Richter,Paul D. Thistle

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3351930

2019-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:We analyze the effect of ambiguous loss probabilities on competitive insurance markets with asymmetric information. We characterize equilibria under actuarially fair pricing with preferences that are second-order ambiguity averse (have smooth indifference curves). We also show existence of uniqueness of the second-best contracts and provide a characterization. Non-increasing absolute ambiguity aversion is sufficient for adverse selection in the smooth model. We then determine the effect of ambiguity on equilibrium under ambiguity aversion. There is a coverage effect because ambiguity relaxes the self-selection constraint and raises the available coverage for the low risks, and an ambiguity effect because ambiguity makes ambiguity averse agents worse off. Both effects are conflicting when it comes to their impact on the critical pro-portion of high risks required for a Rothschild-Stiglitz equilibrium to exist and social welfare. We derive conditions that allow to resolve the indeterminate social welfare effect.
On a gap between rational annuitization price for producer and price for customer

Nikolai Dokuchaev

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41272-018-00163-5

2018-09-24

Abstract:The paper studies pricing of insurance products focusing on the pricing of annuities under uncertainty. This pricing problem is crucial for financial decision making and was studied intensively, however, many open questions still remain. In particular, there is a so-called "annuity puzzle" related to certain inconsistency of existing financial theory with the empirical observations for the annuities market. The paper suggests a pricing method based on the risk minimization such that both producer and customer seek to minimize the mean square hedging error accepted as a measure of risk. This leads to two different versions of the pricing problem: the selection of the annuity price given the rate of regular payments, and the selection of the rate of payments given the annuity price. It appears that solutions of these two problems are different. This can contribute to explanation for the "annuity puzzle".

General Economics,Mathematical Finance
Estimating Equilibrium in Health Insurance Exchanges: Price Competition and Subsidy Design under the ACA

Pietro Tebaldi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdae020

2024-02-22

Abstract:Abstract Regulations to design private yet publicly sponsored health insurance markets are increasingly adopted in many OECD countries. Here I combine data and economic theory to analyze the interaction between insurers’ competition and the design of premium subsidies in determining equilibrium outcomes. My empirical model includes adverse selection, rich heterogeneity in preferences for vertically and horizontally differentiated plans and accommodates alternative assumptions on pricing conduct. In the context of the Affordable Care Act in the US, I estimate the joint distribution of preferences and expected cost using Californian administrative records on 3.7 million plan choices between 2014-2017, combined with plan and survey data on medical claims. An empirical horse race between conduct assumptions favors oligopoly pricing over perfect competition. Considering alternative subsidy designs shows that, in equilibrium, shifting subsidy generosity toward the “young invincibles” would lower premiums for all enrollees while increasing enrollment and profits.

economics
AN EQUILIBRIUM GUIDE TO DESIGNING AFFINE PRICING MODELS

Bjørn Eraker,Ivan Shaliastovich

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9965.2008.00346.x

2008-10-01

Mathematical Finance

Abstract:The paper examines equilibrium models based on Epstein–Zin preferences in a framework in which exogenous state variables follow affine jump diffusion processes. A main insight is that the equilibrium asset prices can be computed using a standard machinery of affine asset pricing theory by imposing parametric restrictions on market prices of risk, determined inside the model by preference and model parameters. An appealing characteristic of the general equilibrium setup is that the state variables have an intuitive and testable interpretation as driving the consumption and dividend dynamics. We present a detailed example where large shocks (jumps) in consumption volatility translate into negative jumps in equilibrium prices of the assets as agents demand a higher premium to compensate for higher risks. This endogenous “leverage effect,” which is purely an equilibrium outcome in the economy, leads to significant premiums for out‐of‐the‐money put options. Our model is thus able to produce an equilibrium “volatility smirk,” which realistically mimics that observed for index options.

economics,social sciences, mathematical methods,mathematics, interdisciplinary applications,business, finance
Monopoly, Heterogeneous Beliefs and Imperfect Information: The Insurance Market

Michiko Ogaku

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/apjri-2018-0030

2019-03-27

Abstract:Abstract This paper questions how heterogeneity of beliefs about the probability of loss affects equilibrium insurance contracts, firm behavior, and welfare focusing especially on the effect of optimism when a monotonicity property, which is a major assumption of prior work, is violated. This paper shows that optimistic individuals could result in insurance driving out individuals who exert effort, if the fraction of such optimistic individuals is significantly large. In addition, this paper shows that optimism could have negative effects on profits of the firm even though both parties realize the asymmetry in beliefs. These results are not only consistent with empirical evidence from several insurance markets on correlation of risk and coverage, but also simply align themselves with empirical evidence on the tendencies of people to be unrealistically optimistic.
Multidimensional Private Information, Market Structure and Insurance Markets

Hanming Fang,Zenan Wu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2856582

2016-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:A large empirical literature found that the correlation between insurance purchase and ex post realization of risk is often statistically insignificant or negative. This is inconsistent with the predictions from the classic models of insurance a la Akerlof (1970), Pauly (1974) and Rothschild and Stiglitz (1976) where consumers have one-dimensional heterogeneity in their risk types. It is suggested that selection based on multidimensional private information, e.g., risk and risk preference types, may be able to explain the empirical findings. In this paper, we systematically investigate whether selection based on multidimensional private information in risk and risk preferences, can, under different market structures, result in a negative correlation in equilibrium between insurance coverage and ex post realization of risk. We show that if the insurance market is perfectly competitive, selection based on multidimensional private information does not result in negative correlation property in equilibrium, unless there is a sufficiently high loading factor. If the insurance market is monopolistic or imperfectly competitive, however, we show that it is possible to generate negative correlation property in equilibrium when risk and risk preference types are sufficiently negative dependent, a notion we formalize using the concept of copula. We also clarify the connections between some of the important concepts such as adverse/advantageous selection and positive/negative correlation property.
Dynamic Investment-Driven Insurance Pricing: Equilibrium Analysis and Welfare Implication

Bingzheng Chen,Zongxia Liang,Shunzhi Pang

2024-10-24

Abstract:This paper develops a dynamic model to analyze the general equilibrium of the insurance market, focusing on the interaction between insurers' underwriting and investment strategies. Three possible equilibrium outcomes are identified: a positive insurance market, a zero insurance market, and market failure. Our findings reveal why insurers may rationally accept underwriting losses by setting a negative safety loading while relying on investment profits, particularly when there is a negative correlation between insurance gains and financial returns. Additionally, we explore the impact of regulatory frictions, showing that while imposing a cost on investment can enhance social welfare under certain conditions, it may not always be necessary. Therefore, we emphasize the importance of tailoring regulatory interventions to specific market conditions.

Theoretical Economics,Portfolio Management
Insurer Commitment and Dynamic Pricing Pattern

Ruo Jia,Zenan Wu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s10713-018-0036-9

2018-01-01

Abstract:A central issue in dynamic contracting is the type of inter-temporal pricing pattern. Some insurance products exhibit a highballing (front-loaded) pattern and others a lowballing (back-loaded) pattern, while still others are flat. We develop a unified competitive dynamic insurance model with asymmetric learning to investigate the impact of insurer commitment on the equilibrium inter-temporal pricing pattern. The model predicts that the equilibrium contract exhibits highballing under one-sided commitment and lowballing under no commitment. We then use a unique empirical setting of two products from one insurer, eliminating heterogeneity in firm, market, time horizon, and learning environment, to isolate the role of insurer commitment in determining the pricing pattern. Consistent with our theoretical predictions, we find that (i) the dynamic contracts exhibit a highballing pattern in loaner's personal accident insurance, a one-sided commitment scenario, and (ii) a lowballing pattern in group critical illness insurance, a no-commitment scenario.
Ambiguity and Insurance: Capital Requirements and Premiums

Simon Dietz,Oliver Walker

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jori.12208

2017-03-23

Abstract:Many insurance contracts are contingent on events such as hurricanes, terrorist attacks, or political upheavals, whose probabilities are ambiguous. This article offers a theory to underpin the large body of empirical evidence showing that higher premiums are charged under ambiguity. We model a (re)insurer that maximizes profit subject to a survival constraint that is sensitive to the range of estimates of the probability of ruin, as well as the insurer's attitude toward this ambiguity. We characterize when one book of insurance is more ambiguous than another and general circumstances in which a more ambiguous book requires at least as large a capital holding. We subsequently derive several explicit formulae for the price of insurance contracts under ambiguity, each of which identifies the extra ambiguity load.

economics,business, finance
Effects of Competition on Insurance Contract Formation

Michael R. Powers,Joseph Qiu,April Shen,Zhan Shen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10920277.2016.1191995

2016-01-01

North American Actuarial Journal

Abstract:For an insurance transaction between a single risk-averse buyer and single risk-neutral seller with positive transaction costs, it is well known that the buyer will prefer a policy contract with an ordinary deductible. More detailed results demonstrate the Pareto optimality of an insurance contract characterized by a deductible (followed by coinsurance) for a single risk-averse buyer and single risk-averse seller. In the present work, we employ a market-game model to solve for the equilibrium insurance contract. This formulation, which approximates the behavior of excess property insurance and property catastrophe reinsurance markets, reveals that the equilibrium policy is described by full insurance up to a given policy limit, with no deductible or coinsurance. Our analysis shows further that this solution persists regardless of the numbers of buyers and sellers in the market, and in particular that the market-game equilibrium does not converge to a Pareto-optimal result because of boundary constraints on the number of sellers. Finally, we test our price-formation mechanism against an important generalization, and find that the policy-limit contract persists.
Non-Life Insurance Pricing: Multi Agents Model

Amir H. Darooneh

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2004-00363-x

2004-02-09

Abstract:We use the maximum entropy principle for pricing the non-life insurance and recover the Bühlmann results for the economic premium principle. The concept of economic equilibrium is revised in this respect.

Statistical Mechanics,Pricing of Securities
Pricing and Capital Allocation for Multiline Insurance Firms With Finite Assets in an Imperfect Market

John A. Major,Stephen J. Mildenhall

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2008.12427

2020-08-28

Risk Management

Abstract:We analyze multiline pricing and capital allocation in equilibrium no-arbitrage markets. Existing theories often assume a perfect complete market, but when pricing is linear, there is no diversification benefit from risk pooling and therefore no role for insurance companies. Instead of a perfect market, we assume a non-additive distortion pricing functional and the principle of equal priority of payments in default. Under these assumptions, we derive a canonical allocation of premium and margin, with properties that merit the name the natural allocation. The natural allocation gives non-negative margins to all independent lines for default-free insurance but can exhibit negative margins for low-risk lines under limited liability. We introduce novel conditional expectation measures of relative risk within a portfolio and use them to derive simple, intuitively appealing expressions for risk margins and capital allocations. We give a unique capital allocation consistent with our law invariant pricing functional. Such allocations produce returns that vary by line, in contrast to many other approaches. Our model provides a bridge between the theoretical perspective that there should be no compensation for bearing diversifiable risk and the empirical observation that more risky lines fetch higher margins relative to subjective expected values.
Equity Allocation and Portfolio Selection in Insurance

Erik Taflin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.math/9907160

1999-07-24

Abstract:A discrete time probabilistic model, for optimal equity allocation and portfolio selection, is formulated so as to apply to (at least) reinsurance. In the context of a company with several portfolios (or subsidiaries), representing both liabilities and assets, it is proved that the model has solutions respecting constraints on ROE's, ruin probabilities and market shares currently in practical use. Solutions define global and optimal risk management strategies of the company. Mathematical existence results and tools, such as the inversion of the linear part of the Euler-Lagrange equations, developed in a preceding paper in the context of a simplified model are essential for the mathematical and numerical construction of solutions of the model.

Optimization and Control,Probability,Portfolio Management
A Multi Period Equilibrium Pricing Model

Traian A. Pirvu,Huayue Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1205.6193

2012-05-29

Abstract:In this paper, we propose an equilibrium pricing model in a dynamic multi-period stochastic framework with uncertain income streams. In an incomplete market, there exist two traded risky assets (e.g. stock/commodity and weather derivative) and a non-traded underlying (e.g. temperature). The risk preferences are of exponential (CARA) type with a stochastic coefficient of risk aversion. Both time consistent and time inconsistent trading strategies are considered. We obtain the equilibriums prices of a contingent claim written on the risky asset and non-traded underlying. By running numerical experiments we examine how the equilibriums prices vary in response to changes in model parameters.

Optimization and Control,Trading and Market Microstructure
Probability weighting and insurance demand in a unified framework

Johannes G. Jaspersen,Richard Peter,Marc A. Ragin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s10713-022-00074-x

2022-01-31

The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review

Abstract:Abstract We provide a comprehensive analysis of the impact of probability weighting on optimal insurance demand in a unified framework. We identify decreasing relative overweighting as a new local condition on the probability weighting function that is useful for comparative static analysis. We discuss the effects of probability weighting on coinsurance, deductible choice, insurance demand for low-probability, high-impact risks versus high-probability, low-impact risks, and insurance demand in the presence of nonperformance risk. Probability weighting can make better or worse predictions than expected utility depending on the insurance demand problem at hand.
Measurement and Pricing of Risk in Insurance Markets

Andreas Tsanakas,Evangelia Desli

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00684.x

2005-11-15

Risk Analysis

Abstract:The theory and practice of risk measurement provides a point of intersection between risk management, economic theories of choice under risk, financial economics, and actuarial pricing theory. This article provides a review of these interrelationships, from the perspective of an insurance company seeking to price the risks that it underwrites. We examine three distinct approaches to insurance risk pricing, all being contingent on the concept of risk measures. Risk measures can be interpreted as representations of risk orderings, as well as absolute (monetary) quantifiers of risk. The first approach can be called an "axiomatic" one, whereby the price for risks is calculated according to a functional determined by a set of desirable properties. The price of a risk is directly interpreted as a risk measure and may be induced by an economic theory of price under risk. The second approach consists in contextualizing the considerations of the risk bearer by embedding them in the market where risks are traded. Prices are calculated by equilibrium arguments, where each economic agent's optimization problem follows from the minimization of a risk measure. Finally, in the third approach, weaknesses of the equilibrium approach are addressed by invoking alternative valuation techniques, the leading paradigm among which is arbitrage pricing. Such models move the focus from individual decision takers to abstract market price systems and are thus more parsimonious in the amount of information that they require. In this context, risk measures, instead of characterizing individual agents, are used for determining the set of price systems that would be viable in a market.

public, environmental & occupational health,mathematics, interdisciplinary applications,social sciences, mathematical methods

Equilibrium condition in Insurance Pricing: a particular case

OPTIMAL REINSURANCE UNDER EXPECTED VALUE PRINCIPLE

Insurance policy value and Pareto-optimal retention in the hypothesis of rare loss events

Equilibrium reinsurance strategies for n insurers under a unified competition and cooperation framework

Utility-based indifference pricing of pure endowments in a Markov-modulated market model

Ambiguity Aversion in Competitive Insurance Markets with Asymmetric Information

On a gap between rational annuitization price for producer and price for customer

Estimating Equilibrium in Health Insurance Exchanges: Price Competition and Subsidy Design under the ACA

AN EQUILIBRIUM GUIDE TO DESIGNING AFFINE PRICING MODELS

Monopoly, Heterogeneous Beliefs and Imperfect Information: The Insurance Market

Multidimensional Private Information, Market Structure and Insurance Markets

Dynamic Investment-Driven Insurance Pricing: Equilibrium Analysis and Welfare Implication

Insurer Commitment and Dynamic Pricing Pattern

Ambiguity and Insurance: Capital Requirements and Premiums

Effects of Competition on Insurance Contract Formation

Non-Life Insurance Pricing: Multi Agents Model

Pricing and Capital Allocation for Multiline Insurance Firms With Finite Assets in an Imperfect Market

Equity Allocation and Portfolio Selection in Insurance

A Multi Period Equilibrium Pricing Model

Probability weighting and insurance demand in a unified framework

Measurement and Pricing of Risk in Insurance Markets