The Mass Distribution of Extrasolar Planet-Candidates and Spectroscopic-Binary Low-Mass Companions

Tsevi Mazeh,Dorit Goldberg,David W. Latham

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/311464

1998-05-13

Abstract:We consider the mass distribution of the nine unseen companions orbiting solar-type stars with minimum possible masses in the planetary mass range reported as of March 1998. We compare the mass distribution of these nine extrasolar planet candidates with the distribution of low-mass secondaries in spectroscopic binaries. We choose to use a logarithmic scale to study the combined mass distribution, because of the large range of masses, 0.5-300 Jupiter masses, involved. Although the results are based on a very small number of systems, the combined distribution looks different at the high- and low-ends. At the high-mass end the distribution drops steeply from 200 to 20 Jupiter masses. At the planetary range of masses the distribution is flat, and might even rise mildly from, say, 20 to 0.6 Jupiter masses, depending on the assumed detection threshold for the precise surveys. The transition region between the two slopes is at about 10-30 Jupiter masses. One possible interpretation of this result is that we have here two different populations. Maybe the lower-mass population was formed like planets, out of an accretion disc, while the high-mass population was formed like binary stars. If the shape of the combined distribution can be verified by many more detections, and if the planetary-mass objects prove to be extrasolar planets, this can give us the long-sought clue for how to distinguish planets from low-mass stellar companions.

Astrophysics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to distinguish whether low - mass companions orbiting solar - type stars are planets or low - mass stars (such as brown dwarfs). Specifically, by comparing the mass distributions of exoplanet candidates and low - mass companions in spectroscopic binaries, the author attempts to find the differences between these two types of celestial bodies.

### Research Background

In recent years, scientists have discovered multiple low - mass companions orbiting solar - type stars through high - precision radial velocity measurements. The minimum mass range of these companions is between 0.5 and 10 Jupiter masses. However, since the inclination of the orbital plane relative to the line of sight cannot be measured, the true masses of these companions are still unknown. Therefore, these companions may be planets or low - mass stars (such as brown dwarfs).

### Research Questions

The key questions that the author attempts to answer are: Can these low - mass companions be divided into two different types of celestial bodies? If so, are there significant differences in the mass distributions of these two types of celestial bodies? Can this difference help us distinguish between planets and low - mass stars?

### Main Findings

1. **Differences in Mass Distribution**:
- The author found that there is an obvious transition region in the mass distribution of exoplanet candidates in the range of approximately 10 - 30 Jupiter masses.
- Below this transition region, the mass distribution is relatively flat and may even rise slightly; above the transition region, the mass distribution drops rapidly.

2. **Possible Explanations**:
- The author speculates that this difference in mass distribution may be due to two different formation mechanisms. Lower - mass celestial bodies may be planets formed through accretion disks, while higher - mass celestial bodies may be companions in binary systems formed through large - scale gravitational collapse.
- This difference provides an important clue for distinguishing between planets and low - mass stars.

### Conclusions

If this finding is supported by more observational data, the transition region of 10 - 30 Jupiter masses may become a key indicator for distinguishing between planets and low - mass stars. This will not only help in understanding the formation mechanisms of these celestial bodies but may also reveal the essential differences between planets and low - mass stars.

### Formula Explanation

The mass distribution formulas involved in the paper are as follows:

- \( \text{log}(M/M_J) \) represents the logarithmic mass in units of Jupiter mass.
- \( N \) represents the number of celestial bodies in a certain mass interval.
- \( C=(1 - U[K_{\text{min}}])^{-1} \) is a factor used to correct undetected binary systems, where \( U[K_{\text{min}}] \) is the non - detection probability.

These formulas are used to describe and analyze the number distribution of celestial bodies in different mass intervals and perform corresponding statistical corrections.