Abstract:I flesh out the sense in which the informational approach to interpreting quantum mechanics, as defended by Pitowsky and Bub and lately by a number of other authors, is (neo-)Bohrian. I argue that on this approach, quantum mechanics represents what Bohr called a ``natural generalisation of the ordinary causal description'' in the sense that the idea (which philosophers of science like Stein have argued for on the grounds of practical and epistemic necessity) that understanding a theory as a theory of physics requires that one be able to ``schematise the observer'' within it is elevated in quantum mechanics to the level of a postulate in the sense that interpreting the outcome of a measurement interaction, as providing us with information about the world, requires as a matter of principle, the specification of a schematic representation of an observer in the form of a `Boolean frame' -- the Boolean algebra representing the yes-or-no questions associated with a given observable representative of a given experimental context. I argue that the approach's central concern is with the methodological question of how to assign physical properties to what one takes to be a system in a given experimental context, rather than the metaphysical question of what a given state vector represents independently of any context, and I show how the quantum generalisation of the concept of an open system may be used to assuage Einstein's complaint that the orthodox approach to quantum mechanics runs afoul of the supposedly fundamental methodological requirement to the effect that one must always be able, according to Einstein, to treat spatially separated systems as isolated from one another.

Critique of Protective Measurements

Why protective measurement does not establish the reality of the quantum state

Protective measurements of the wave function of a single system

Protective Measurements and the Reality of the Wave Function

Protective Measurement, Postseletion and the Heisenberg Representation

Implications of protective measurements on de Broglie-Bohm trajectories

Pointers for Quantum Measurement Theory

Comment on "Protective measurements and Bohm's trajectories" by Y.Aharonov, B.G.Englert, and M.O.Scully

Protecting a quantum state from environmental noise by an incompatible finite-time measurement

Performance advantage of protective quantum measurements

Comparison of Quantum State Protection Against Decoherence Via Weak Measurement, a Survey

Demystifying weak measurements

Protecting quantum states from decoherence of finite temperature using weak measurement

Axiomatic foundation of quantum measurements and survival effect

Entanglement Protection Using Weak Measurement in Non‐Markovian Environment

A short note about the dynamical description of the measurement process in quantum physics

Measurement-free topological protection using dissipative feedback

Measurement in Quantum Field Theory

Response to "The measurement postulates of quantum mechanics are not redundant"

Reconsideration of quantum measurements

The Measurement Problem Is a Feature, Not a Bug--Schematising the Observer and the Concept of an Open System on an Informational, or (Neo-)Bohrian, Approach