Abstract:Sense of agency (SoA) is the sense of having control over one's own actions and through them events in the outside world. Sometimes temporal cues, that is temporal contiguity between action and effect, or temporal expectation regarding the occurrence of the effect are used to infer whether one has agency over an effect. This has mainly been investigated in Western cultures. However, Western and Eastern cultures differ in their time concepts and thus their usage of temporal cues may also differ. We investigated whether Western and Eastern cultures (Austrian vs. Mongolian students) use temporal cues differently. Participants performed adaption blocks in which actions were followed by immediate (immediate effect group) or by delayed (delayed effect group) effects. In subsequent test blocks the action–effect delay was varied and participants' SoA over the effect was assessed. In Austrian students, the immediate effect group experienced more SoA for short action–effect delays, whereas the reverse was true for the delayed effect group. Thus, temporal expectation rather than temporal contiguity is used as predominant agency cue. In Mongolian students, SoA did not significantly differ between different action–effect delays in both groups, indicating that Mongolian students hardly rely on temporal cues. In conclusion, due to linear time concepts in Western cultures, the timing of an effect may be an important agency cue in Austrian students. However, due to cyclical time concepts in some Eastern cultures, it may be a less important agency cue in Mongolian students. Thus, the use of temporal agency cues is culture-dependent.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: Are there differences between Western cultures (represented by Austrian students) and Eastern cultures (represented by Mongolian students) in using time cues to infer the sense of agency (SoA) of behavioral effects? Specifically, the researchers wanted to explore the following points: 1. **Do people from different cultural backgrounds rely on different time cues when inferring the sense of agency?** - **Temporal Contiguity**: That is, the time interval between the behavior and the effect. - **Temporal Expectation**: That is, an individual's expectation of the time interval between the behavior and the effect. 2. **How do cultural differences in the linear time concept and the cyclic time concept affect the formation of the sense of agency?** - Western cultures usually hold a linear view of time, believing that time is a one - way flow from the past to the future, and thus may pay more attention to the specific time when an event occurs. - Some Eastern cultures hold a cyclic view of time, emphasizing the repetitiveness and periodicity of events, and thus may be less dependent on specific time intervals. ### Research Background The sense of agency (SoA) refers to people's sense of control over their own behaviors and their influence on the outside world. Previous studies have mainly focused on Western cultures and found that temporal contiguity is one of the important cues for inferring the sense of agency. However, there are significant differences in the concept of time between Eastern and Western cultures, which may lead to differences in their use of time cues to infer the sense of agency. ### Research Purpose The purpose of this study is to verify the following hypotheses through experiments: - Among Austrian students, temporal contiguity and temporal expectation have a greater impact on the sense of agency, and they function in different ways. - Among Mongolian students, time cues have a smaller impact on the sense of agency, showing less dependence on time intervals. ### Experimental Design To distinguish the impact of temporal contiguity and temporal expectation on the sense of agency, the researchers designed an experimental paradigm, including an adaptation phase and a test phase: - **Adaptation Phase**: Participants were divided into two groups, one group experienced an immediate effect (immediate effect group), and the other group experienced a delayed effect (delayed effect group) to induce different temporal expectations. - **Test Phase**: In the test phase, the delay time between the behavior and the effect was systematically changed, and participants were required to evaluate their sense of control over the effect. ### Main Findings 1. **Austrian Students**: - In the immediate - effect group, participants had a stronger sense of agency for short - delay effects, and as the delay increased, the sense of agency decreased significantly. - In the delayed - effect group, participants had a stronger sense of agency for long - delay effects, and a weaker sense of agency for short - delay effects. 2. **Mongolian Students**: - Whether in the immediate - effect group or the delayed - effect group, there was no significant difference in the participants' sense of agency for effects with different delay times, indicating that Mongolian students are less dependent on time cues to infer the sense of agency. ### Conclusion The study shows that there are indeed differences between Western and Eastern cultures in using time cues to infer the sense of agency. These differences may stem from their different concepts of time. For future research, understanding these cultural differences will help to better explain human behavior and cognitive mechanisms and provide theoretical support for cross - cultural communication. --- The above summarizes the main problems and research content of this paper. If you have more specific questions or need further information, please feel free to let me know!

When time does not matter: cultures differ in their use of temporal cues to infer agency over action effects

Time perception and the experience of agency

An Issue of Public Affairs Management: the Effect of Time Slack and Need for Cognition on Prediction of Task Completion

Previous experience of action-effect predictability and delay affect perceived agency and decision-making independently

Sense of agency at a temporally-delayed gaze-contingent display

Two faces of temporal binding: Action- and effect-binding are not correlated

Temporal binding window and sense of agency are related processes modifiable via occipital tACS

A spatial-attentional mechanism underlies action-related distortions of time judgment

Cultural background influences implicit but not explicit sense of agency for the production of musical tones

Do future actions matter more than past deeds? Temporal moral attribution in U.S. and Chinese school-age children

Effect of Predictability of Emotional Valence on Temporal Binding

Time Orientation and Attitudes toward Advertising in a High-Context Culture: An Empirical Study of Macau

Eye did this! Sense of agency in eye movements

The sense of agency is action–effect causality perception based on cross-modal grouping

EXPRESS: Influences of Temporal and Probabilistic Expectation on Subjective Time of Emotional Stimulus

Approaching future rewards or waiting for them to arrive: Spatial representations of time and intertemporal choice

When dyads act in parallel, a sense of agency for the auditory consequences depends on the order of the actions

English and Mandarin speakers’ mental representations of time: Some new evidence about the language-thought relationship

Influence of voluntary action and outcome valence on the sense of agency

Sense of agency predicts severity of moral judgments