Hydration Status Response to Bolus Frequency and Volume Intake During Exercise in Heat
Jonathan R. Larson,Nate E. Bartman,Zachary J. Schlader,Blair D. Johnson,David Hostler,Riana R. Pryor
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0000679496.32209.1d
2020-01-01
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Abstract:Workplace hydration recommendations suggest consuming 237mL of fluid every 15-20 min during physical work in the heat. It is unknown if these recommendations promote hydration during work and if consuming larger boluses of water less frequently maintains hydration better than smaller boluses of water consumed more frequently. PURPOSE: Examine if consuming 500mL water every 40 min maintains hydration better than 237mL water every 20 min during work in the heat. METHODS: Seven healthy adults completed 2 trials while fasted, either consuming 237mL water every 20 min (237) or 500mL water every 40 min (500). Subjects performed 2 h of treadmill exercise at 6.4kph, 1.0% grade in 34°C, 30% relative humidity wearing shorts and a t-shirt, followed by 2 h of rest in a temperate room. Heart rate (HR), rectal temperature (Trec), skin temperature (Tskin), were measured throughout exercise and recovery. Gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms were measured during exercise. Nude body mass was measured pre- and post-exercise. Blood and urine samples were collected pre- and post-exercise, and after recovery. RESULTS: HR, Trec, and Tskin increased from pre- (58±10, 62±9 bpm; 36.8±0.3, 36.7±0.3°C; 32.3±0.4, 32.3±0.9°C) to post- (132±29, 136±33 bpm, p=0.01; 38.1±0.6, 38.0±0.7°C, p=0.01; 35.5±0.6, 35.6±1.1°C, p<0.01) exercise and returned to baseline (62±10, 68±15 bpm, p=0.88; 36.7±0.2, 36.7±0.2°C, p=1.00; 32.9±0.7, 32.6±1.0°C, p=0.89) following recovery, in 237 and 500, respectively. GI symptoms were similar among trials and times (p=0.38). In 500, urine specific gravity was lowest following recovery (1.005±0.003) compared to pre- (1.015±0.002, p<0.01) and post- (1.011±0.006, p=0.02) exercise. Plasma osmolality was not different between post-exercise (282±3, 281±4 mOsm/L) and recovery (283±1, 284±2 mOsm/L) compared to pre-exercise (287±6, 286±3 mOsm/L, p=0.96) in 237 and 500, respectively. Changes in plasma volume were similar among trials and times (p=0.78). Post-exercise body mass loss (-0.1±0.5, 0.0±0.5 kg, p=0.28) and sweat rate (0.7±0.2, 0.6±0.5 L/h, p=0.41) were similar, in 237 and 500, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Hydration status was similar between drinking larger, less frequent water boluses and smaller, more frequent boluses. These findings provide flexibility for workers to take less frequent hydration breaks.