Using relationship-focused reflection to improve teacher–child relationships and teachers' student-specific self-efficacy

Rianne J Bosman,Marjolein Zee,Peter F de Jong,Helma M Y Koomen,Rianne J. Bosman,Peter F. de Jong,Helma M.Y. Koomen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2021.06.001
IF: 6.033
2021-08-01
Journal of School Psychology
Abstract:<p>The present study evaluated whether LLInC (Leerkracht-Leerling Interactie Coaching in Dutch, or Teacher-Student Interaction Coaching), a teacher-based coaching-intervention, yielded improvements in dyadic affective teacher–child relationships in elementary school (Grades 2–6). Based on attachment theory, LLInC aims to foster more flexible and differentiated mental representations of teachers' relationships with individual children with whom they experience relationship difficulties. Using a quasi-experimental design, we compared an intervention group of teachers (<em>n</em> = 46 teachers and 92 children) receiving LLInC with a control group receiving no form of intervention (<em>n</em> = 32 teachers and 88 children). To investigate possible transfer effects, we asked teachers from the intervention group to report on their relationships and self-efficacy beliefs regarding two other children with whom they experienced relationship difficulties as well (<em>n</em> = 46 teachers and 81 children). Multilevel models were used to examine intervention effects on teachers' perceptions of relationship quality (i.e., Closeness, Conflict, Dependency), and teachers' student-specific self-efficacy beliefs for Behavior Management and Emotional Support. Teachers receiving LLInC reported short-term improvements in Closeness and self-efficacy beliefs for Emotional Support and decreases in Conflict as compared to control teachers. Similar improvements in Closeness and self-efficacy for Emotional Support were found for the intervention-transfer group as compared to control teachers. Also, teachers receiving LLInC had short-term and longer-term improvements in self-efficacy beliefs for Behavior Management as compared to control teachers. These improvements regarding Behavior Management were not found for the intervention-transfer group.</p>
psychology, educational
What problem does this paper attempt to address?