Abstract:Academic abstract: Advantaged group allies have multiple motives for supporting equality, raising questions about their sincerity. We draw upon the covariation model of attributions to explain how disadvantaged group members make attributions about whether advantaged group "allies" are sincerely motivated to empower the disadvantaged group. We propose an Attribution-Identity Model of Sincerity (AIMS) which posits that disadvantaged group members view advantaged group members as sincere allies when they support equality in the presence of inhibitory causes and in the absence of facilitative causes, exceed expectations for the advantaged group, and provide support across time and contexts. Furthermore, those who identify strongly with their disadvantaged group and perceive intergroup inequality as illegitimate are most motivated to ascertain the sincerity of advantaged group members' allyship. AIMS suggests how members of disadvantaged groups seek to maximize benefits and minimize risks of advantaged group members' allyship. Public abstract: Advantaged group members (e.g., men, White Americans) can act as allies for disadvantaged groups (e.g., women, Americans belonging to minoritized racial groups), but members of disadvantaged groups sometimes have reason to question whether their motives are sincere. We argue that members of disadvantaged groups view advantaged group allies as more sincere when they support equality when they do not stand to benefit from it and even when they stand to lose. We also argue that members of disadvantaged groups view advantaged group allies as more sincere when their support for equality goes beyond expectations for their advantaged group, consistently over time, and is not limited to particular situations, forms, or contexts. Members of disadvantaged groups like sincere allies, want to work with them, and feel safe around them. Sincere allies also serve as moral exemplars to other members of advantaged groups.

Self-knowledge in joint acceptance accounts

Collective Belief and Acceptance

Group Belief

Goal Commitment And Alignment Of Personal Goals Predict Group Identification Only When The Goals Are Shared

"My Aim Is True": An Attribution-Identity Model of Ally Sincerity

Solitary social belief

Joint attention to mental content and the social origin of reasoning

A new look at joint attention and common knowledge

Integrating Individual Preferences into Collective Argumentation

The social grounds of personal self: Interactions that build a sense of 'we' help clarify who 'I' am

Achieving Harmony among Different Social Identities within the Self-Concept: The Consequences of Internalising a Group-Based Philosophy of Life

Joint attention, relationalism, and individuation

I, VOLKSWAGEN

In Defence of Pre-Reflective Self-Consciousness: The Heidelberg View

Group Minds and the Case of Wikipedia

Is self‐awareness necessary to have a theory of mind?

Group identification, joint attention, and preferences: a cluster of minimal pre-conditions for joint actions

Joint perception, joint attention, joint know-how

Mentalizing, Attachment, and Epistemic Trust in Group Therapy

Does implicit mentalizing involve the representation of others' mental state content? Examining domain-specificity with an adapted Joint Simon task

Shared worlds and shared minds: A theory of collective learning and a psychology of common knowledge.