Abstract:Purpose The application of mobile augmented reality (MAR) for enhancing user experiences and consumer patronizing intention has been the focus of recent MAR literature. Few studies examine the differences between apps. This study fills the research gap by examining how consumers assess their experiences with different MAR applications and how their decision-making process is performed, particularly in the setting of smartphones. Design/methodology/approach A web-based online survey was administered to collect data on consumers' perceptions of two different MAR apps: utilitarian and hedonic apps. Reliability and validity of the measurement scales, non-response bias and comment method bias were assessed. With the support of measurement model, partial least square (PLS) was employed to test the research hypotheses. Findings This study reveals that the technological attributes of augmented reality (AR) apps have significant effects on consumer perceptions of their utilitarian and hedonic benefits, including interactivity, visual quality, service quality, technicality and aesthetics. Moreover, this study shows that consumers of hedonic apps place more importance on their enjoyment with the MAR app; consumers of utilitarian apps focus more on the accrued functional values. The findings provide practical insights for retailers in AR marketing and application development in the MAR environment. Originality/value This study provides a comprehensive viewpoint for analyzing ongoing use and purchase intentions simultaneously in a unified theoretical framework. In addition, it compares different types of MAR apps: hedonic and utilitarian. Furthermore, it is one of the first few studies attempting to provide a comprehensive understanding of the predictive role of MAR technologies by incorporating privacy concerns into the research model based on user and gratification framework.

A Viewpoint on the Societal Impact of Everyday Augmented Reality and the Need for Perceptual Human Rights

To See and be Seen—Perceived Ethics and Acceptability of Pervasive Augmented Reality

Visions of augmented reality in popular culture: Power and (un)readable identities when the world becomes a screen

Towards Security and Privacy for Multi-user Augmented Reality: Foundations with End Users

Augmented reality as a Thirdspace: Simultaneous experience of the physical and virtual

Ethical Considerations of AR Applications in Smartphones; A Systematic Literature Review of Consumer Perspectives

Challenges and New Directions in Augmented Reality, Computer Security, and Neuroscience -- Part 1: Risks to Sensation and Perception

Exploring social perceptions of everyday smartglass use in Australia

From Virtual Gains to Real Pains: Potential Harms of Immersive Exergames

Assessing user benefits and privacy concerns in utilitarian and hedonic mobile augmented reality apps

Augmented reality is eating the real-world! The substitution of physical products by holograms

With or Without Permission: Site-Specific Augmented Reality for Social Justice

Extended Reality for Knowledge Work in Everyday Environments

Consumer Consciousness in Multisensory Extended Reality

Mass-Market Augmented Reality: The Difficulty behind its Integration and the Path to Success

Leveraging Artificial Intelligence to Promote Awareness in Augmented Reality Systems

THE INDIVIDUAL AND THE PROPERTY IN VIRTUAL WORLDS

Designing and Evaluating Scalable Privacy Awareness and Control User Interfaces for Mixed Reality

The Impact of Social Environment and Interaction Focus on User Experience and Social Acceptability of an Augmented Reality Game

Tools, perspectives and avatars in blended reality space

Digital Eyes: Social Implications of XR EyeSight