0322 Achieving Deep Sleep in the Magnetic Resonance Environment
Hideyuki Oshima,Moon West,Vidhya Vijayakrishnan Nair,Brianna Kish,Yunjie Tong,A J Schwichtenberg
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsae067.0322
IF: 6.313
2024-04-20
SLEEP
Abstract:Abstract Introduction Polysomnography, which includes Electroencephalography (EEG), is a widely used method for categorizing wake/sleep into four distinct states. However, achieving sleep within the magnetic resonance (MR) environment can be challenging given the associated loud sounds and confining space elements. Protocols designed to support sleep in the MR environment are uncommon but are needed to allow for simultaneous fMRI-EEG recordings. Methods This study utilized two comparable cohorts to develop a simultaneous fMRI-EEG protocol to maximize deep sleep in the MR environment. In both cohorts sleep patterns were monitored via actigraphy for one week preceding a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) session. In cohort 1 (n = 8), participants were instructed to wake earlier than usual, resulting in approximately 3 hours of sleep debt before attempting to initiate sleep in the MR environment. During the scan, participants experienced a looped scan sequence (with a relatively higher frequency than the second cohort) for one hour. In cohort 2 (n = 10), a parallel protocol was followed, but the looped scan sequence was extended to 1 hour and 40 minutes and the frequency was lower. Additionally, cohort 2 participants underwent 2-3 nights of sleep onset with MR sound recordings directly before their scheduled MRI session. Results The two cohorts had distinct sleep architecture differences; wherein, cohort 2 achieved significantly more deep sleep in the MR environment. Cohort 1 participants had 288 (52%), 69 (12%), 122 (22%), and 30 (5%) minutes of Wake, NREM-1, NREM-2, and NREM-3 respectively. Cohort 2 had 202 (24%), 177 (21%), 150 (18%), and 180 (22%) minutes of Wake, NREM-1, NREM-2, and NREM-3 respectively. Given the complexity of the MR environment, unsure and artifact ‘uncodable’ epochs/minutes were also calculated: cohort 1: 48 (9%) minutes and cohort 2: 121 (15%) minutes. Conclusion In both protocols, participants successfully obtained sleep; however, the protocol with sound acclimation and a longer scan sequence resulted in notably higher amounts of deep sleep. Future studies utilizing simultaneous fMRI-EEG measurement would be well advised to follow a similar protocol. As our understanding of brain activity during sleep increases, so will our need to obtain successful simultaneous fMRI-EEG measurements. Support (if any)
neurosciences,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?