Comparison of clinical outcomes between Castor single-branched stent graft and in situ fenestration in treating Stanford type B aortic dissection involving the left subclavian artery: A retrospective case-control study
Xiang Weng,Teng Zhang,YiLiang Hu,XianGui Li,Weimin Zhou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000040623
IF: 1.6
2024-11-28
Medicine
Abstract:Thoracic aortic dissection is 1 of the most dangerous diseases affecting human health. If it is not treated in time, the mortality rate of patients is 22.7% within 6 hours, up to 50% within 24 hours, and the mortality rate will rise to 68% within 1 week .[ 1 ] Thoracic aortic endovascular repair (TEVAR) is an important treatment for thoracic aortic dissection. [ 2 , 3 ] The purpose of TEVAR is to close the proximal tear with a covered stent graft, thereby inducing thrombosis of the false lumen, expansion of the true lumen, and restoration of blood flow. In patients with Standford type B aortic dissection (TBAD), the primary tear usually arises from the left subclavian artery (LSA), a few centimeters distal to the entrance. [ 4 , 5 ] Mesar et al found that 89.5% of TBAD patients had a healthy proximal descending aorta of <2 cm, implying a lack of an adequate proximal anchoring zone. [ 6 ] A clear definition of an adequate proximal anchoring area means that the area between the proximal edge of the stented graft and the proximal tear is adequately covered and firmly secured when performing a stented graft procedure, a step that is critical to the success of the procedure. Thus, proximal extension of the stented graft is necessary when an adequate proximal anchoring zone is lacking. It has been reported that LSA coverage is 1 way to create a sufficient anchoring zone; However, as found in clinical practice, LSA coverage is associated with increased risk of stroke and spinal cord ischemia. [ 7 , 8 ] Therefore, it is crucial to better preserve and reconstruct the LSA to reduce the risk of stroke and spinal cord ischemia. Although traditional open surgery can effectively preserve the branch vessels of the superior arch, it also has the disadvantages of high invasiveness, reliance on extracorporeal circulation, deep hypothermic circulatory arrest, and relatively large surgical complications. [ 5 ] The continuous development of minimally invasive techniques and materials has led to the emergence of a variety of advanced vascular intervention techniques, including parallel (chimney) stents, "submerged mirror" techniques, fenestration, and branch stents, etc, which can effectively expand the proximal landing zone. [ 6 ] Among them, fenestration techniques include in situ fenestration technique and in vitro pre-fenestration technique, which are commonly used surgical approaches to preserve supra-arch branch vessels, and their operation difficulty and operation risk are significantly lower than those of open surgery. [ 7 ] Castor single-branched stent transplantation also has lower operation difficulty and surgical risk and can maintain the blood supply of LSA. [ 9 ] The aim of this study is to compare and evaluate the clinical efficacy of Castor single-branched stent graft and in situ fenestration technique in the treatment of type B aortic dissection involving the LSA, and to provide a reference for the treatment of TBAD involving the LSA.
medicine, general & internal