Canon Law and Spiritual Vulnerability - A Scholastic Perspective

Stephan Hecht
DOI: https://doi.org/10.61840/fundcan.24.2
2023-01-01
Abstract:Spiritual abuse is probably one of the most subtle forms of abusive behavior in ecclesiastical and pastoral environments posing challenges for both – Canon Law and Systematic Theology. So far, there are several definitions of spiritual abuse that can mostly be found in Protestant scholarship. Yet, there is hardly any research that tries to understand spiritual abuse from a historic-systematic perspective. Starting from a definition by Reisinger identifying spiritual abuse as the abuse of someone’s “spiritual autonomy”, this article wants to shed a Thomistic-Suárezian perspective on this topic showing not only, how this definition is backed by Scholastic conceptual thinking but also, how the protection of an independent spiritual realm of human existence presupposes the right understanding of law and function of Canon Law in order to fully grasp this form of abusive behavior on a juridical level. After elaborating on these fundamental issues, the article thus finally introduces into crucial normative aspects in the current Code of Canon Law that protect the fundamental “spiritual autonomy”. To tackle spiritual abuse as essentially an abuse of power (c. 1378) thus requires an awareness and sensibility towards human spirituality as an "existential" that must be distinguished but cannot be separated from the psycho-physical dimension of human existence.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?