Abstract:Fred Kusumoto, 1 Jacqueline Ross, 2 Dan Wright, 2 Richard A Chazal, 3 Richard E Anderson 2 1 Heart Rhythm Service, Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA; 2 The Doctors Company, Napa, CA, USA; 3 Lee Health Heart and Vascular Institute, Fort Myers, FL, USA Correspondence: Fred Kusumoto, Heart Rhythm Service, Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Ave, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA, Tel +1904 953-7277, Email Objective: Medical malpractice claims represent patient dissatisfaction of care delivered by their healthcare provider. Evaluation of contributing factors (CFs) associated with claims provides important information to optimize the patient–provider relationship. Study Design: A total of 21,101 closed claims with 54,479 CFs (2.2 contributing factors per claim) from a large medical professional liability coverage provider were analyzed from 2010 to 2019. Results: Four clinical CFs (technical performance, management of therapy, patient assessment, and patient factors) and four nonclinical CFs (communication between providers and patient, communication among providers, failure or delay in obtaining a consult, and insufficient documentation) were identified > 1,500 times. Nonclinical CFs increased as a percentage from 50% in the first part of the study period to 54% in the second part of the study period (p < 0.01), and were more frequent in cases associated with indemnity when compared to clinical CFs (Nonclinical: 57% vs 43%; p < 0.001). Poor communication as a CF increased steadily during the study period (3-year average; 2010– 2012: 777 CF/year vs 2017– 2019: 1207 CF/year; p < 0.001). In claims associated with high severity injury, poor communication among providers was more significant than poor communication between the provider and patient (63% vs 29%; p < 0.001), mainly due to failure to convey the severity of the patient's condition. For non-surgical specialties except psychiatry, communication was the highest CF and the second or third CF for psychiatry or surgical specialties. Discussion: Clinical and nonclinical CFs are equally important for malpractice claims. Communications issues are particularly important regardless of specialty. While focusing on clinical quality is important, implementing strategies that account for nonclinical issues, with a particular focus on communication, would have significant benefits particularly in an environment of increased consolidation of healthcare delivery systems. Plain Language Summary: Nonclinical and clinical issues are equally common contributors underlying a malpractice claim, and nonclinical issues are more frequent in claims associated with indemnity.Communication-related (communication between the patient and the healthcare provider and communication among providers) contributing factors were the most observed nonclinical parameter and the incidence has steadily risen over the study decade.Current strategies in healthcare to improve communication have not been effective and developing systems and strategies that focus on communication and other nonclinical issues could significantly decrease future malpractice claims. Keywords: closed claims, malpractice, professional liability, communication Medical professional liability, more commonly referred to as medical malpractice has a significant impact on medicine. 1–8 In one study from 1991 to 2005 of more than 40,000 physicians, the annual risk of a medical liability claim was 7.4% and the authors projected that 99% of physicians in high-risk specialties and 75% of physicians in low-risk specialties would face a malpractice claim by age 65 years. 2 The absolute dollar contribution of malpractice to overall healthcare costs is low. However, claims represent a significant social cost and may be an important component for loss of trust between the patient and the medical system or healthcare provider and significant resources and time are necessary to close a claim (Pegalis and Bell, Choy, Beckman, Hickson 1994. In a United States based survey of patients, 21% said they directly experienced a medical error and 31% said they were involved in a "situation where an error occurred in someone else's care". 7 The healthcare environment has changed dramatically with several overall trends including increased physician employment and team-based care delivery, larger and more diverse industries involved in healthcare, increased application of new technologies, and new financing strategies that incentivize care delivery in nontraditional settings and new organizational structures. 9–11 These changes will have a great -Abstract Truncated-

Physician Utilization Review: The Chasm of Potential Liability for Both Treating and Utilization Review Physicians

Participatory risk management: promoting physician compliance with practice guidelines

Managed Care and Capitation in California: How Do Physicians at Financial Risk Control Their Own Utilization?

An Effective Program to Reduce Malpractice Claims and Payments in a Large Orthopaedic Practice

Opportunity cost of oncology subspecialist opinion.

Physicians, Cost Control, and Ethics

Examining the role of the physician as a source of variation: Are physician-related variations necessarily unwarranted?

Medical professional liability in gastroenterology: definitions, trends, risk factors, provider behaviors, and implications

Assessing the Benefits and Downsides of Physician Review Websites to Plastic Surgeons

How automated insurance authorization affects transparency, provider burden, and payer policies and processes: The true impact of prior authorization.

Effective physician credentialing. Properly monitoring medical staffs can protect hospitals from liability

Scoping Review: Anesthesiologist Involvement in Alternative Payment Models, Value Measurement, and Nonclinical Capabilities for Success in the United States of America

Medical malpractice: managing the risk

Analysis of Closed Claims Among All Medical Specialties: Importance of Communication and Other Non-Clinical Contributing Factors

Taking the Initiative: Risk-Reduction Strategies and Decreased Malpractice Costs

Invited Article: Threats to physician autonomy in a performance-based reimbursement system

Medico-legal risk and use of medical directives in the emergency department

Status of current medicolegal reform in the United States: a neurosurgical perspective

Vox clamantis in deserto: a survey among Italian psychiatrists on defensive medicine and professional liability

A Medical Staff Peer Review System in a Public Teaching Hospital—An Internal Quality Improvement Tool