(Invited) Safety and Performance Testing of Commercial Sodium-Ion Batteries

Rachel Elizabeth Carter,Gordon Henry Waller,Corey T. Love
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1149/ma2023-023476mtgabs
2023-12-22
ECS Meeting Abstracts
Abstract:Sodium-ion batteries (SIBs) have emerged on the global market and are poised to complement the ubiquitous li-ion battery (LIB). SIBs deliver a lower energy density than LIBs but utilize more globally abundant materials and boasts a higher degree of safety. These batteries possess similarities to LIBs but contain a wider range of materials due to the different size and reactivity of the alkali ion. Herein we utilize accelerating rate calorimetry (ARC) and electrochemical analysis to characterize the safety and performance of two cell types. The Cell A contains an aqueous electrolyte and has power capability (up to 80 C or 200 A) but low energy density (~30 Wh/kg), while the Cell B cell is non-aqueous and delivers higher energy density (~80 Wh/kg). ARC reveals benign failure modes compared to LIBs for single cells and 3 cells touching. Calorimetry also reveals minimal self-heating during charge/discharge, mitigating need for pack thermal management. Electrochemical analysis identifies impressive rate capability (tested up to 20 A) and a wide range of ambient temperatures (-20 to 45 °C). Both cells utilize aluminum for both positive and negative current collectors, since sodium and aluminum do not alloy. This is unique in comparison to LIBs, that require a copper current collector at the anode, preventing low voltage storage, where the copper reduces and dissolves. Therefore we investigated “de-energized” or 0 V storage of both SIBs. Cell A proved robust to these excursions, while Cell B exhibited capacity loss but maintained a high degree of safety.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?