Abstract:Purpose This study aims to investigate how the Chinese Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and Chinese outward foreign direct investments (FDI) impact the Belt and Road countries (BRCs). It draws on postcolonial theory to investigate the (geo)political objectives behind the financial and economic means. Design/methodology/approach In line with the nature of postcolonial studies, the study applies a discourse analysis integrating it with empirical data on indebtedness and trade. Findings This study finds that FDI and the BRI, as a development project, need to be considered a double-edged sword for the receiving countries. The authors provide evidence that China has instrumentalized financial and economic means to gain political influence and pursue geopolitical ambitions. Moreover, investments into sensitive sectors (e.g. energy, infrastructure), combined with the BRCs' inability to pay back loans, could eventually lead to China gaining control of these assets. Research limitations/implications The study investigates the financial and economic means that are instrumentalized to gain political influence while not considering flows of technology and know-how. It also limits itself to the study of FDI coming from one specific country, i.e. China. Therefore, no comparison and evaluation are made of FDI from other countries, such as the USA or European countries. Practical implications By revealing noncommercial objectives and geopolitical ambitions that China pursues through the BRI, the authors derive policy implications for the BRCs, third countries and China. Originality/value The study contributes to postcolonial theory and neocolonialism by investigating how China uses financial and economic means to achieve noncommercial objectives and pursue geopolitical ambitions. Additionally, the authors enhance the understanding of FDI by highlighting more subtle aspects of the complex and contextual nature of FDI as a social phenomenon, which have been overlooked thus far. The authors challenge the predominant positive framing of FDI and provide a counterpoint to the way FDI is often coined.

Debt Trap Diplomacy of China in the Eyes of International Media

The myth of ‘debt-trap diplomacy’ and realities of Chinese development finance

A critical look at Chinese ‘debt-trap diplomacy’: the rise of a meme

How China Lends: A Rare Look into 100 Debt Contracts with Foreign Governments

"The Belt and Road" Initiative and Education Diplomacy

China's economic and trade development: Imbalance to equilibrium

Belt and Road Countries’ External Debt and China’s New Strategies

China, international competition and the stalemate in sovereign debt restructuring: beyond geopolitics

China's Rise and the Reshaping of Sovereign Debt Relief

Reassessing China’s Rise

Debt, distress, dispossession: towards a critical political economy of Africa’s financial dependency

China’s Influence on Global Development Finance: Disrupting Traditional Institutions

Developing by borrowing? Inter-jurisdictional competition, land finance and local debt accumulation in China

An Alternative View of Sri Lanka's Debt Crisis

International and African media’s representation of African Debt to China: From stereotype to solution with constructive journalism

New development: Implicit government debt in China—past, present and future

The Unfolding Sovereign Debt Crisis

Comment On "Is China'S Development Finance A Challenge To The International Order?"

Debt for Growth?

The Chinese belt and road initiative: development project with strings attached?

Infrastructure Finance, Late Development, and China’s Reshaping of International Credit Governance