Abstract:Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, public health teams tried several approaches to circulate accurate health information and engage with community members to understand what they need from public health services. Two such approaches were community champions and community participatory action research (CPAR). This study evaluates two champion programmes and a CPAR programme in terms of what worked, for whom, and in what contexts, including the funding and resourcing associated with implementation. Methods: Between June 2022 and June 2023, a realist evaluation of three distinct case studies (COVID-19 champions, Vaccine Champions, and CPAR programmes) in the city of Southampton in England was conducted in three stages: development of initial programme theories and collection of additional contextual information, including funding and resources associated with delivering each programme; initial programme theory testing; synthesis of final programme theories. Data was collected primarily through semi-structured interviews ( n = 29) across programme and training leads, voluntary services, community organisations, volunteers, and local community members, and one focus group with local community members ( n = 8). Results: The City Council used £642 k from two funding awards to deliver the programmes: COVID-19 Champions £41 k; Vaccine Champions £485 k; and CPAR programmes £115 k. Twenty-eight initial programme theories were generated, which were "tested" to support, refine, or refute context-mechanism-outcome relationships, resulting finally in a set of 22 programme theories across the three programmes. Six demi-regularities were generated, each featuring in multiple programme theories, and providing data on how and why these programmes can work, and in which contexts: (1) building trust through community connections; (2) fostering relationships and collaboration; (3) provision of training and resources; (4) local community knowledge and expertise; (5) community representation and leadership; (6) appropriate communication and information sharing. Conclusion: This study provides new knowledge and understanding of the factors affecting the implementation of community champion and CPAR approaches during public health emergencies. These findings suggest that representation and involvement of community members, establishing and building on trust, adequate training and resources, and clear communication from trusted community members and organisations are catalysts for meaningful engagement with communities. Evaluation registration: Research Registry identifier: researchregistry8094.

Qualitative Process Evaluation of Urban Community Work: A Preliminary View

Community Grand Rounds: Re-Engineering Community and Academic Partnerships in Health Education—A Partnership and Programmatic Evaluation

Reflections on community-based population health intervention and evaluation for obesity and chronic disease prevention: the Healthy Alberta Communities project

Community-Engaged Learning in Public Health: An Evaluation of Utilization and Value of Student Projects for Community Partners

Academic-Community Partnerships: Effectiveness Evaluated Beyond the Ivory Walls

A Community Participatory Approach to Identify Common Evaluation Indicators for Community Health Worker Practice

Community Member and Stakeholder Perspectives on a Healthy Environment Initiative in North Carolina

A Framework for Rigorous Qualitative Research as a Component of Mixed Method Rapid-Cycle Evaluation

Qualitative Exploration of Cultural Influence on a Rural Health-Promotion Initiative

Impact of Participatory Health Research: A Test of the Community-Based Participatory Research Conceptual Model

Evaluating Partnerships for Community Health Improvement: Tracking the Footprints

A realist evaluation of community champion and participatory action approaches during the COVID-19 pandemic

Can communities be mobilised to build capacity to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic? A qualitative process evaluation

Community‐Driven Health Promotion: Evaluation of a Rural Microgrant Program

Evaluation of Community Health Education Workshops among Chinese Older Adults in Chicago: A Community-Based Participatory Research Approach

Process evaluation of an integrated community-based intervention for promoting health equity in children in a new residential development area

Evaluating qualitative data analysis workshops from the perspective of public contributors

A method for assessing the success and failure of community-level interventions in the presence of network diffusion, social reinforcement, and related social effects

Centering the role of community health workers in social risk screening, referral, and follow-up within the primary care setting

A Qualitative Evaluation of a Community Based, Culturally Relevant Intervention to Promote Healthy Food Access in American Indian Communities

Community-Engaged Public Health Research to Inform Hospital Campus Planning in a Low Socioeconomic Status Urban Neighborhood