Abstract:Three strictly comparable cross-section household dataset,related to 1988,1995 and 2001,are used to analyze the rapid yet unequal growth of wage and the sharp widening of wage structure.Earnings functions are compared and the increase in both the level and the inequality of wages are decomposed into their constituent elements.Distinctions are made between the variables likely to represent human capital,discrimination,and segmentation.The evidence suggests that productive characteristics were increasingly rewarded as marketization The Gini coefficient of earnings rose by 10.7 percentage points in the first phase from 1988 to 1995.Whereas the mean wage increased by 67 percent,the pay of the 10th percentile rose by only 22 percent,and that of the 90th percentile rose by 97 percent.These changes are much larger than those of the second phase from 1995 to 2001.Moreover,the returns to education rose sharply,as did the returns to occupation-specific skills.The initially slight inverse-U shape of the age-earnings profile became more pronounced: a change consistent with human capital theory.Thus the productive characteristics of workers were increasingly rewarded in the labor market.However,there were also signs of greater wage discrimination against women.Moreover,the market forces operating in the growing private sector and the relative immunity of the state sector from those forces generated greater wage segmentation among types of ownership,and provincial differences in the pace of reform and in economic growth created spatial segmentation in wages that could not be removed by the equilibrating movement of labor.Decomposition analyses were conducted in order to examine the contribution of particular characteristics to the rise in the Gini coefficient.Only a third of earnings inequality and its increase could be explained: the unobserved determinants are clearly important to the increase in earnings dispersion.The discrimination variables accounted for only a small part of the increase.The segmentation variables made the most important contribution,and that was mainly due to growing wage dispersion among provinces.This result is supported by other evidence of powerful divergence in mean earnings among provinces(Knight,Li and Zhao,2001).Some but not all components of human capital were disequalizing.These particular changes are likely to represent the stirring of labor market forces.

Wage Differentials and Inequality in Managerial and Professional Jobs: Quantile Regression Analysis

Wage Differentials between Public and Non-public Sector Based on Quantile Regression

The Wage Gap Between State And Private Enterprises In China: Counterfactual Analysis Based On Quantile Regression

Rising Wage Inequality:Composition Effect and Price Effect

Marketization and Unequal Growth of Wage: Their Extent and Influence Factors

Interpreting the Caste-based Earning Gaps in the Indian Labour Market: Theil and Oaxaca Decomposition Analysis

The distribution of wage inequality across municipalities in Mexico: a spatial quantile regres-sion approach

Remuneration Differences In The Emerging Economies Of China And India

Informality, Education-Occupation Mismatch, and Wages: Evidence from India

Examining Wage Disparities by Race and Ethnicity of Health Care Workers

Employment Choices and Wage Differentials: Evidence on Labor Force Data Sets from Pakistan

Wage Differentials in the Post Liberalized Labor Market in Paksitan

Earnings Differences Between Chinese and Indian Wage Earners, 19872004

Understanding Urban Wage Inequality in China 1988-2008: Evidence from Quantile Analysis

Estimation of Wage Inequality in the UK by Quantile Regression with Censored Selection

Privatization and Wage Inequality in Developing Countries

Quantitative analysis of historical data for prediction of job salary in India - A case study

Wage Differentials and Mobility in the Urban Labour Market: A Panel Data Analysis for Mexico

The rich-poor divide: Unravelling the spatial complexities and determinants of wealth inequality in India

Socio-economic inequalities in spending on various levels of education across Indian households: an update

Vulnerable Sites: Bottom-of-the Pyramid Blue-Collar Workers, Occupational Gendering and Earnings Disparity