True or False? Viewer Perceptions of Emotional Staff and Stock Photos in the News

Tara Marie Mortensen,Colin Piacentine,Taylor Wen,Nora Bost,Brian McDermott
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23736992.2023.2295942
2024-01-01
Journal of Media Ethics
Abstract:The phenomenon of multi-used stock photography in the news contradicts the photojournalism professional values of truthful and emotional depictions. This reality echoes other false images increasingly appearing in the media, including deepfakes and artificial intelligence. In the present study, a two (stock and staff photo) by two (positive and negative valence) quasi-experiment is conducted. The dependent variables include: 1) credibility; 2) self-reported arousal level; 3) emotional valence perceptions; 4) fixation duration; and 5) fixation count. Participants viewed staff photos as more credible in both positive and negative valences. Negative photos were perceived as slightly less credible. Stock and staff photos were similarly arousing, received similar valence perceptions, and had similar gaze fixations and durations. Overall, participants perceived the genuine emotion portrayed truthfully in photojournalism as opposed to the faux emotion acted out in stock photos.
communication,ethics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?