Abstract:Objectives: this study sheds light on disciplinary evidence and defines its features to ascertain if an employee has committed a disciplinary violation while carrying out his job duties. It demonstrates how the Administrative Investigation Committee can establish the burden of proof. Further, the study offers crucial recommendations for the Jordanian legislator to perform its duties effectively. Research Problem: the adequacy of organising special rules of evidence before the Administrative Investigation Committee to detect behavioural violations. The Jordanian legislator addressed these rules in Article 146/b/2 of the Jordanian civil service Bylaw No. 9 of 2020. However, these rules are not integrated, as it is assumed that the administration has complete evidence of claims of behavioural violations. It does not have the right to accuse the employee of deviating from his job mandate without evidence. The employee is also entitled to present evidence refuting such claims. Thus, it falls to investigation committees to search for the necessary evidence to clarify the truth. The study demonstrates the legislator’s lack of interest in the rules that deal with evidentiary evidence in disciplinary violations and the failure of the Jordanian legislation to organise evidence to detect violations committed by public servants. Methods: this study adopts a descriptive and analytical approach that compares the Jordanian, Egyptian and Emirati legislation concerning the rules of evidence. Results and Conclusions: the paper concludes by with the following results such as: Jordanian civil service Bylaw fails to organise the means of evidence and administrative papers, as the legislator did not explicitly grant the Administrative Investigation Committee the authority to review documents related to the violation. In contrast, they were expressly formulated in the Egyptian and Emirati legislations. As well as, the Jordanian legislator did not deal with the method of inspection before the administrative investigation committee in the Civil Service Bylaw, unlike the Egyptian legislator who regulated that method in the law and provided instructions to the Administrative Prosecution. Such was also the case for the UAE federal legislator within the framework of the executive regulations of the human resources law in the federal government. -

Unraveling the Intricacies of Implementing Judicial Pardon within UAE Legislation

Judicial Application of Restrictive Commutation of Death Penalty with Suspension: Comment on No. 12 Guiding Case of the Supreme People's Court

Wrongful Convictions Without Punishment Trought Judicial Pardon Perspective Fiqh Islamic Criminal Law

Governance of the right to privacy under administrative and penal legislation: An analytical study

Proof of Disciplinary Violations during Administrative Investigation per Jordanian civil service Bylaw No. 9 of 2020: A Comparative Study

Penal Mediation as Alternative Dispute Resolution: A Criminal Law Reform in Indonesia

IMPLEMENTATION OF RESTORATIVE JUSTICE, THE INTENT OF PUNISHMENT, AND LEGAL CLARITY IN INDONESIA

The Importance of Analysis of Judicial Circumstances in the Sentence Dosimetry Process

Penal Mediation as the Concept of Restorative Justice in the Draft Criminal Procedure Code

Implementation of the Prosecutor's Authority on the Restorative Justice Implementation in the Settlement of Minor Crimes

CRIMINAL CASES RELATED TO CHEQUES IN THE LIGHT OF THE OMANI LITIGATION PROCEDURES FACILITATION LAW PURSUANT TO ROYAL DECREE NO. 125/2020

The rationale for detention in the Jordanian Code of criminal procedure: A comparative study with French law

Procedural Justice, Therapeutic Jurisprudence, and Reoffending: Adjudicating Palestinian Minors in the West Bank's Military Court

IMPROVEMENT OF CRIMINAL LEGAL REGULATIONS ON CIRCUMSTANCES OF MITIGATION OF PUNISHMENT

Overlapping Penalties in the Jurisprudence of the Four Schools of Thought: A Comparative Jurisprudential Study

The Role of Electronic Notification in Accelerating the Litigation Proceedings in Civil Lawsuits: (A Comparative Study)

Alternative Punishment In The Criminal Justice System

Effect of Innovation on The Relationship of Knowledge Management Process and Digital Service Performance in UAE Judicial System Model

Public Prosecutor’s Waiver of Prosecution as a Sub-institution of the Russian Criminal Procedure Law

The Interpretation of Age of Criminal Responsibility for Juvenile Offenders from the Perspectives of Islamic Jurisprudence (Fiqh) and Malaysian Law

Sentencing Corporate Defendants: A Comparative Study among Kuwaiti and Britain Law