Abstract:This paper was intended to explain the reason why the Zen Buddhism temples in the latter part of the Silla Dynasty that built Avatamska Vairocana Buddha statues became to believe in Avatamska Vairocana Buddha statues unlike the discipline of the Zen sect that regards the Buddhist sanctuary where Zen masters preach Buddhist teachings so that complete enlightenment can be obtained on behalf of Buddha as the most important space without building the Buddhist sanctum where the main Buddha statue is created and the rituals such as sutra chanting or prayers to Buddha are held. According to the result of the study, although it has been vaguely assumed that the Avatamska Vairocana Buddha was enshrined in Zen Buddhism temples in the latter part of the Silla Dynasty, when the literature data and excavation investigation results were put together, no clear evidence to conclude such an assumption could be found. In addition, given that the Avatamska Vairocana Buddha statue was not enshrined in the main building of the temple, which is the central Buddhist sanctum of the Zen Buddhism temple, but was enshrined in an attached Buddhist temple or created after a considerable period of time after the temple was built, it was found that the Avatamska Vairocana Buddha statue did not play the role of the main Buddha statue, which was the main object of worship from the beginning. In particular, it was confirmed that Avatamska Vairocana Buddha was not believed as the main Buddha in Zen Buddhism temples in the latter part of the Silla Dynasty from the mention that the iron Vairocana Buddha statue in Borimsa Temple played the role of decorating the place where Chejing stayed, written in the 「Bojo Zen master Changseong stone monument」. The Zen masters who created mountain monasteries in the latter part of the Silla Dynasty must have adapted to the Zen Buddhism temple system of the Tang age through studying abroad and thus it is thought that they followed the Buddhism temple architecture presented in the『Baizhang Qinggui (百丈淸規)』 in the Tang age. However, the Zen Buddhism temples in the latter part of the Silla Dynasty enshrined the Avatamska Vairocana Buddha statue unlike the Zen Buddhism temples of the Tang age, and it is presumed that they could not but respond to the demand from the royal family because the royal family sponsored the operation of Zen Buddhism temples with political purposes. In the latter part of the Silla Dynasty, the Avatamsaka sutra studies were popular such as the creation of the Avatamska Vairocana Buddha statue centered on the royal temple, and it is thought it affected Zen Buddhism temples. It is understood that in the latter part of the Silla Dynasty, the Zen sect supplemented and developed its ideological system while actively developing ideological exchanges with the Huayan sect. In the atmosphere of the Buddhist world where the Zen sect and the Huayan sect communicate, the original theory of the Zen sect that Buddha statues are not the true form of the Tathagata and therefore do not need to be respected was not followed, and Zen Buddhism temples became to enshrine the Avatamska Vairocana Buddha statue, which was most familiar to Buddhists. By analyzing the mention that Buddha statues could not but be created to convey enlightenment written in the 「Dansoksa Temple Shinhaeng Zen master monument」 and the recognition of Avatamska Vairocana Buddha recorded in 「Borimsa Temple Bozo Zen master Changseong stone monument」 which is in line with the Buddha faith view in 「Avatamsaka sutra」 the reason why Zen Buddhism temples in the latter part of the Silla Dynasty became to believe in Avatamska Vairocana Buddha could be concretely understood.

To the Brighter Side. New Tendencies in Erecting Statues of Bodhisattva Jizō in Japanese Buddhist Temples

Jizō-kō and Sentai-Jizō wo horu kai: Finding new bonds through Jizō carving activity

Establishing Shintō Funerals in Edo Japan

Jizo (Ksitigarbha) Statues under Palm Trees: The Materialization of Early Japanese Immigrant Culture in Hawai‘i

Sasaki Gesshō’s Views on Jizō Sūtras and Jizō Worship

The Dialectical of Life and Death in Contemporary Sōka Gakkai

Understanding Japanese society through life after death

CONSIDERATIONS ON THE TRANSFORMATION OF THE POSITION OF JIZO IN KYOTO THROUGH ANALYZING THE NEWSPAPER ARTICLES

Portable Faith: Toward a Non-Site-Specific History of Buddhist Art in Japan

Suicide and the afterlife: popular religion and the standardisation of 'culture' in Japan

Considerations on the transformation of the position of Jizo in Kyoto by analyzing newspaper articles

Zen buddhism in tradition, culture and society of Japan

Analyzing the Characteristics of Buddhist Art in Japans Asuka Period: A Case Study of Horyu-ji Temple

Japanese Cemeteries in China(1871-1945)

The Background of Stone Pagoda Construction in Ancient Japan

P193: Participation of faith-based organizations in the secular health- and welfare- care system for the older people in Japan: evidence and challenges

Japan’s Ritsuryō System and Shintō Shrines Arose as Twins

A Study on the Background of Formation in the Avatamska Vairocana Buddha statues in Zen Buddhism temples in the Latter Part of the Silla Dynasty

Buddhist-Shinto Syncretization at the Medieval Suwa Shrine

SACRED ARCHITECTURE OF BUDDHISM AND SHINTO BEFORE THE BEGINNING OF ACTIVE CULTURAL INTERACTION BETWEEN CHINA AND JAPAN

From the Afterlife to Architecture: Tracing the Nexus of Life and Death in Prehistoric, Egyptian, and Japanese Built Environments