Abstract:Perubahan UUD 1945 yang telah dilakukan MPR membuktikan, bahwa ada benturan kepentingan sehingga menjadikan perubahan konstitusi yang ‘tambal sulam’ dan tidak berorientasi kepentingan jangka panjang, serta jauh dari kata memuaskan karena ‘elitis’ dan kurang partisipatif, maka perubahan konstitusi seharusnya tidak dilakukan oleh satu lembaga saja yang dalam hal ini adalah MPR. Oleh karna itu, penting kirannya melibatkan Mahkamah Konstitusi agar tercipta hasil perubahan UUD NRI 1945 yang partisipatif. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui tentang apa urgensi pelibatan mahkamah konstitusi dalam perubahan Undang Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945, dan bagaimana prospektif pelibatan mahkamah konstitusi dalam perubahan undang undang dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Penelitian ini mengunakan Jenis penelitian normatif. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa Urgensi pelibatan MK dalam perubahan Undang Undang Dasar di dasarkan pada beberapa hal, antara lain: Pertama, terdapat banyak kelemahan dalam amandemen pertama sampai dengan amandemen ke-empat; Kedua, Eksistensi MPR sebagai lembaga politik; ketiga, Pelakasanaan prinsip Checks and Balance System; Keempat, Perwujudan MK sebagai The Guardian Of Consitution. Bahwa Prospektif pelibatan MK dalam perubahan UUD NRI 1945 adalah dengan menekankan pada political good will dari MPR untuk menyusun Mekanisme perubahan UUD NRI 1945 dengan melibatkan MK sebagai lembaga negara yang memberikan Sertfikasi Konstitusi dari hasil kajian perubahan yang dilakukan oleh Komisi konstitusi sebelum mendapatkan persetujuan dari MPR untuk ditetapkan sebagai hasil perubahan UUD 1945 yang baru. hasil dari mekanisme perubahan konstitusi dengan melibatkan MK ini ditujukan untuk menghasilkan perubahan konstitusi yang bersifat the people of the constitution.The amendments of the 1945 Constitution that the MPR has done proves that there is a conflict of interest that makes constitutional changes ‘patchy' and not oriented to a long term interest and far from satisfying because of 'elitist' and less participatory. Thus, the changes to the constitution should not be carried out by one institution only which in this case is the MPR. Therefore, it is important to involve the Constitutional Court in order to create a participatory change in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. This study aims to find out about the urgency of involving the Constitutional Court in the amendment of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, and how prospective the Constitutional Court to involve in the amendment to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. This study uses a type of normative research and several approaches, namely; law approach (statue approach), comparative approach, and conceptual approach. The results of this study indicate that the urgency of involving the Constitutional Court in amending the Constitution is based on several things, including: First, the weaknesses in the first amendment to the fourth amendment; Second, the existence of the MPR as a political institution; third, the implementation of the Checks and Balance System principle; Fourth, the realization of the Constitutional Court as the Guardian of Constitution. The prospective involvement of the Constitutional Court in the amendment to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia is to emphasize the political goodwill of the MPR to develop a mechanism for amending the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia by involving the Constitutional Court as a state institution which provides a review of changes made by the constitution before obtaining approval from the MPR to be determined as a result of the amendment to the new 1945 Constitution. The result of the constitutional change mechanism by involving the Constitutional Court was intended to produce constitutional changes that have the character the people of the constitution.

The Urgency of Establishing Constitutional Court Procedural Law

Introduction Theory and Practice Court Procedural Law Constitution

Denyut Nadi Amandemen Kelima UUD 1945 melalui Pelibatan Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai Prinsip the Guardian of the Constitution

Contante Justitie System in Corruption Cases in Indonesia: A Legal Constructivism System Paradigm

Reviewing Constitutional Court Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 Regarding Formal Review of Job Creation Act: a Progressive Law Perspective

National Law Development through Civil Procedure Law Reform as a Manifestation of State Goals during the Covid-19 Pandemic

Pretrial In Indonesian Criminal Law

On Proceduralized Constitution

Strengthening the Open Proportional Election System after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 114/Puu-Xx/2022 from the Perspective of People's Sovereignty

Law Enforcement and Justice: Perspective of Authority and Responsibility of the President towards the Judicial System

IMPLICATIONS OF PERMA NUMBER 7 OF 2022 CONCERNING. ADMINISTRATION OF CASES AND TRIALS. JUDGMENT AS WELL. ELECTRONICS AGAINST. PRINCIPLES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE LAW

Burden Proof Dilemma of Election Disputes in the Constitutional Court

Constitution Formulation and Amendment in Indonesian and American Legal System: A Comparative Study

The Urgence Of The Control Mechanism Of Authority The Prosecutor General In Waiting The Case For Public Interest (Seponeering)

Constitutional Design of State Policy as Guidelines on Indonesia’s Presidential System Development Plan

The Application Of The Principle Of Judges Freedom On SEMA Number 2 Of 2023

The Basic Logic of Constructing Legal Procedures

Procedural Law Regulation: The Problem of Efficiency

THE CONSTITUTIVE ROLE OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE BETWEEN LEGAL SECURITY REQUIREMENTS AND DEVELOPMENT IMPERATIVES

Legal Reconstruction of Judges' Decision on Obscure Lawsuit Exception Based on Justice Value

Penal Mediation as the Concept of Restorative Justice in the Draft Criminal Procedure Code