Abstract:Background: Given the threat posed by cancer to human health, there is a rapid growth in the volume of data in the cancer field and interdisciplinary and collaborative research is becoming increasingly important for fine-grained classification. The low-resolution classifier of reported studies at the journal level fails to satisfy advanced searching demands, and a single label does not adequately characterize the literature originated from interdisciplinary research results. There is thus a need to establish a multilabel classifier with higher resolution to support literature retrieval for cancer research and reduce the burden of screening papers for clinical relevance. Objective: The primary objective of this research was to address the low-resolution issue of cancer literature classification due to the ambiguity of the existing journal-level classifier in order to support gaining high-relevance evidence for clinical consideration and all-sided results for literature retrieval. Methods: We trained a multilabel classifier with scalability for classifying the literature on cancer research directly at the publication level to assign proper content-derived labels based on the "Bidirectional Encoder Representation from Transformers (BERT) + X" model and obtain the best option for X. First, a corpus of 70,599 cancer publications retrieved from the Dimensions database was divided into a training and a testing set in a ratio of 7:3. Second, using the classification terminology of International Cancer Research Partnership cancer types, we compared the performance of classifiers developed using BERT and 5 classical deep learning models, such as the text recurrent neural network (TextRNN) and FastText, followed by metrics analysis. Results: After comparing various combined deep learning models, we obtained a classifier based on the optimal combination "BERT + TextRNN," with a precision of 93.09%, a recall of 87.75%, and an F1-score of 90.34%. Moreover, we quantified the distinctive characteristics in the text structure and multilabel distribution in order to generalize the model to other fields with similar characteristics. Conclusions: The "BERT + TextRNN" model was trained for high-resolution classification of cancer literature at the publication level to support accurate retrieval and academic statistics. The model automatically assigns 1 or more labels to each cancer paper, as required. Quantitative comparison verified that the "BERT + TextRNN" model is the best fit for multilabel classification of cancer literature compared to other models. More data from diverse fields will be collected to testify the scalability and extensibility of the proposed model in the future.

Comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms for biomedical text document classification: A case study on cancer-related publications

Survey and comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms for breast cancer diagnosis: A comprehensive review

Building a challenging medical dataset for comparative evaluation of classifier capabilities

An Experimental Comparison of Machine Learning Classification Algorithms for Breast Cancer Diagnosis

Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms for Breast Cancer Classification: SVM Outperforms XGBoost, CNN, RNN, and Others

A comparative study of breast cancer tumor classification by classical machine learning methods and deep learning method

Machine Learning Based Comparative Analysis for Breast Cancer Prediction

EVALUATING MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHMS FOR BREAST CANCER DETECTION: A STUDY ON ACCURACY AND PREDICTIVE PERFORMANCE

Comparison of Classification Algorithms Used Medical Documents Categorization

Comparative analysis of weka-based classification algorithms on medical diagnosis datasets

Breast cancer detection: an effective comparison of different machine learning algorithms on the Wisconsin dataset

Medical Image Prediction for Diagnosis of Breast Cancer Disease Comparing the Machine Learning Algorithms: SVM, KNN, Logistic Regression, Random Forest, and Decision Tree to Measure Accuracy

A comparative performance assessment of artificial intelligence based classifiers and optimized feature reduction technique for breast cancer diagnosis

Accuracy Assessment of Machine Learning Algorithms Used to Predict Breast Cancer

Applications of Machine Learning Techniques to Predict Diagnostic Breast Cancer

Parametric optimization and comparative study of machine learning and deep learning algorithms for breast cancer diagnosis

A Multilabel Text Classifier of Cancer Literature at the Publication Level: Methods Study of Medical Text Classification

Application of Machine Learning Algorithms in Bioinformatics

Comparative analysis of features and classification techniques in breast cancer detection for Biglycan biomarker images

Comparing Breast Cancer Prediction Models

Breast cancer detection using machine learning approaches: a comparative study