Abstract:Oil, coal, and gas account for approximately 80% of global primary energy, but only a portion of total airborne CO2eq (approx. 35% at GWP20 to 65% at GWP100), even though they account for 95% of total measured CO2 emissions. The benefits of these energy sources, as well as their related costs, are not all incorporated in current energy policy discussions. Global greenhouse gas policies must include documented changes in measured airborne CO2eq to avoid spending large amounts of public funds on ineffective or sub-optimal policies. The authors examined airborne CO2, which is less than half of emitted CO2, as well as reported CH4 emissions and the global warming potential of CH4 as published by the IPCC for coal and natural gas. The surprising conclusion is that surfaced-mined coal appears 'better for the climate' than the average natural gas, and all coal appears beneficial over LNG. Therefore, current CO2-only reduction policies and CO2 taxes are leading to unintended consequences and the switch from coal to natural gas, especially LNG, will not have the desired impact of reducing predicted future global warming; in fact, quite the contrary. A large portion of anthropogenic global warming is attributed by the IPCC and IEA to CH4, but it must be noted that CH4 emissions from natural sources and from agriculture account for approximately 40% and 25% of annual global CH4 emissions respectively. Energy accounts for about 20% of documented CH4 emissions. CO2 contributes only approximately 35% of annual airborne anthropogenic GHG emissions after accounting for CH4, over a 20-year horizon. At a 100-year horizon, the contribution of CO2 increases to approximately 60%. Energy policies that do not consider all GHG emissions along the entire value chain will lead to undesired economic and environmental distortions. All carbon taxation and CO2 pricing schemes are incorrect and need to be revised. At IPCC's GWP20 an approximately 2%1 higher loss of CH4 across the value chain prior to combustion of natural gas versus coal will lead to 'climate parity' of coal with natural gas. According to public data, natural gas value chains have high CH4 and undocumented CO2 losses. On a global average, using only IEA-documented CH4 data, natural gas emits approximately 15% more CO2eq than surface-mined coal, over a 20-year horizon. This difference will increase as the use of shale gas and LNG expands. Investors should support all energy systems in a manner that avoids an energy crisis, including intermittent renewable energy systems where they make sense. If CO2 emissions need to be reduced, one of the most effective ways would be to install ultra-supercritical power plants with CCUS technology. However, the undisputed benefits of increased CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere because of its promotion of photosynthesis and plant growth effects (fertilization) need to be considered in energy policy decisions as well. The authors suggest that future research and development should concentrate on reducing net emissions from fossil fuel power plants and providing cost-effective and reliable new conventional power generation capacity, utilizing clean coal and clean natural gas technology.

LNG AND CLIMATE CHANGE: EVALUATING ITS CARBON FOOTPRINT IN COMPARISON TO OTHER FOSSIL FUELS

LNG as a bridge fuel in the transition to renewable energy: A global perspective

Greenhouse gases emissions in liquified natural gas as a marine fuel: Life cycle analysis and reduction potential

A Study on the Impact of Carbon Liability on the Economic Benefits of the LNG Value Chain: A New Perspective from the Carbon Emission Accounting Model

Carbon capture and sustainability in LNG projects: Engineering lessons for a greener future

The Role of Carbon Footprint Calculation in the World Trade in Liquefied Natural Gas (In Russ.)

Helping the climate by replacing liquefied natural gas with liquefied hydrogen or ammonia?

Life Cycle Assessment of LNG Fueled Vessel in Domestic Services

An assessment of air emissions from liquefied natural gas ships using different power systems and different fuels

Geospatial Life Cycle Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from US Liquefied Natural Gas Supply Chains

The expansion of global LNG trade and its implications for CH4 emissions mitigation

The greenhouse gas footprint of liquefied natural gas (LNG) exported from the United States

Co-benefits of the Liquid Hydrogen Economy and LNG Economy: Advances in LNG Integrating LH2 Production Processes

Comparative Life Cycle Cost Analysis of Low Pressure Fuel Gas Supply Systems for LNG Fueled Ships

Analysis of the elements of the LNG terminal’s location in Dalian Port under the background of carbon neutrality in China

Techno-Economic and Environmental Analyses of an Integrated Liquefied Natural Gas/Allam–Fetvedt Cycle/Air Separation Unit Complex

Global LNG market: supply-demand and economic analysis

A Comparison of Well-to-Wheels Energy Use and Emissions of Hydrogen Fuel Cell, Electric, LNG, and Diesel-Powered Logistics Vehicles in China

Assessing the decarbonization roadmap of a RoPax ferry

Life cycle assessment of liquefied natural gas production from coke oven gas in China

Climate impacts of fossil fuels in todays electricity systems