Abstract:Preliminary empirical evidence using syndicated lending data shows a role for bank specialization in pricing climate transition risk. However, this role varies across geographies and the regulatory and technological aspects of climate transition. Moreover, bank specialization does not necessarily translate into higher lending rates for negatively exposed firms after a major geoclimatic shock to the oil and gas markets. To explain these results, I construct a theoretical model of imperfect screening and competitive bank lending and allow for subsequent (non-Bayesian) belief updates by the banks about the borrowers’ exposure to transition risk based on an informative public signal. The results show that conditional on the results from imperfect screening, the expected interest rates in the equilibrium are higher for borrowers for whom the public signal points towards low productivity in the face of a transition risk shock. However, the interest rate differential is smaller when the banks’ belief updating process is less Bayesian, and banks under-react more to public information. The level of optimal information acquisition also steeply increases as banks under-react more in response to public information. Furthermore, the optimal level of private information acquisition gets more crowded out in response to increasing precision of public information when the average borrower quality is high, implying the possibility of a lack of pricing in relevant transition risk-related information in lending contracts during periods of high credit risk in the economy.

Information about Transition Risk and Bank Lending