Abstract:Implementation of Singapore's Smart Nation program led to the emergence of a number of initiatives on the introduction of artificial intelligence technologies in different areas. One such initiative was the adoption of National AI Strategy. Executive authorities have shaped the policy and rules for the formation and use of artificial intelligence for the period from 2018 to the present day against the legislative background. Its high efficiency has been confirming by the creation of favorable conditions in Singapore for both technological advancements and ensuring the public safety. This article presents the author's vision of the Singapore administrative principles in the field of AI, at the base of which lies the concept of balance between promoting technological and business innovations on the one hand, on the other hand is the protection of citizens' interests. Innovative tools for the support of the introduction of artificial intelligence in the forms of soft law acts adopted by Infocomm Media Development Authority, Personal Data Protection Committee, Monetary Authority of Singapore and Ministry of Health are highlighted. Those include general and specific. Special attention is given to Model AI Governance Framework, which have been praised by the international expert community. The author examines the institutional infrastructure of the public administration in the field of artificial intelligence that goes beyond the Ministry of Communications and Information. He provides examples of the projects fulfilled for the national AI strategies implementation (AI Verify, Veritas, 100E). This article determines features of organizational and legal support for the introduction of artificial intelligence in Singapore that distinguish it from other world leaders. The author makes an attempt to conceptualize the set of rules for the formation and use of artificial intelligence technologies. It reflects the trends of Singapore's AI policy. The author concludes that certain types of AI technologies, for example, generative AI and continuous-learning, have become separate objects of "soft-law" regulation. Two approaches to the scope of the AI-related recommendations are distinguished - for the field of AI in general covering all the areas and for developed areas of AI application (healthcare and finance).

Auditing AI for Whom? A Community-Centric Approach to Rebuilding Public Trust in Singapore

Responsible Urban Innovation Working with Local Authorities a Framework for Artificial Intelligence (AI)

Organizational and Legal Support for the Introduction of Artificial Intelligence in Singapore

Ethics-Based Auditing to Develop Trustworthy AI

WeAudit: Scaffolding User Auditors and AI Practitioners in Auditing Generative AI

Auditing of AI: Legal, Ethical and Technical Approaches

From Transparency to Accountability and Back: A Discussion of Access and Evidence in AI Auditing

A Framework for Assurance Audits of Algorithmic Systems

Ethics, AI, Mass Data and Pandemic Challenges: Responsible Data Use and Infrastructure Application for Surveillance and Pre-emptive Tracing Post-crisis

An Ecosystem Approach to Ethical AI and Data Use: Experimental Reflections

"Come to us first": Centering Community Organizations in Artificial Intelligence for Social Good Partnerships

Addressing the Regulatory Gap: Moving Towards an EU AI Audit Ecosystem Beyond the AIA by Including Civil Society

Advancing AI Audits for Enhanced AI Governance

Closing the AI Accountability Gap: Defining an End-to-End Framework for Internal Algorithmic Auditing

Understanding Public Concerned Ethic Issues and Ethical Acceptance of AI Surveillance Technology: Analysis from Social Media Data.

AI Ethics Principles in Practice: Perspectives of Designers and Developers

Ethical Implications of Artificial Intelligence in Population Health and the Public's Role in Its Governance: Perspectives From a Citizen and Expert Panel

Public vs Private Bodies: Who Should Run Advanced AI Evaluations and Audits? A Three-Step Logic Based on Case Studies of High-Risk Industries

Who Audits the Auditors? Recommendations from a field scan of the algorithmic auditing ecosystem

Consent in Crisis: The Rapid Decline of the AI Data Commons