Abstract:Background: Although well-designed instruments to assess communication during medical interviews and complex encounters exist, assessment tools that differentiate between communication, empathy, decision-making, and moral judgment are needed to assess different aspects of communication during situations defined by ethical conflict. To address this need, we developed an assessment tool that differentiates competencies associated with practice in ethically challenging situations. The competencies are grouped into three distinct categories: communication skills, civility and respectful behavior, clinical and ethical judgment and decision-making. Objective: The overall objective of this project is to develop an assessment tool for ethically sensitive scenarios that measures the degree of respect for the attitudes and beliefs of patients and family members, the demands of clinical decision-making, and the success in dealing with ethical conflicts in the clinical context. In this article, we describe the research method we will use during the pilot-test study using the neonatal context to provide validity evidence to support the features of the Assessment Communication Tool for Ethics (ACT4Ethics) instrument. Methods: This study is part of a multiphase project designed according to modern validity principles including content, response process, internal structure, relation to other variables, and social consequences. The design considers threats to validity such as construct underrepresentation and factors exerting nonrandom influence on scores. This study consists of two primary steps: (1) train the raters in the use of the new tool and (2) pilot-test a simulation using an Objective Structured Clinical Examination. We aim to obtain a total of 90 independent assessments based on the performance of 30 trainees rated by 15 trained raters for analysis. A comparison of raters' responses will allow us to compute a measure of interrater reliability. We will additionally compare the results of ACT4Ethics with another existing instrument. Results: This study will take approximately 18 months to complete and the results should be available by September 2019. Conclusions: ACT4Ethics should allow clinician-teachers to assess and monitor the development of competency of trainees' judgments and communication skills when facing ethically sensitive clinical situations. The instrument will also guide the provision of meaningful feedback to ensure that trainees develop specific communication, empathy, decision-making, and ethical competencies. International registered report identifier (irrid): PRR1-10.2196/12039.

Development and Testing of a Test to Measure Unethical Academic Behavior of Students

Development, reliability, and validity testing of the Ethical Behavior Test: a measure for nurses' ethical behavior

Academic Ethics: a Pilot Study on the Attitudes of Finnish Students

Perceptions of ethical misconduct scale development

Academic Dishonesty and Academic Adjustment Among the Students at University Level: An Exploratory Study

Exploration of Students’ Perception of Academic Misconduct: Do Individual Factors, Moral Philosophy, Behavioral Intention, and Judgment Matter?

Testing a Communication Assessment Tool for Ethically Sensitive Scenarios: Protocol of a Validation Study

Assessing malleable social-psychological academic attitudes in early adolescence

Development and Validation of an Unethical Professional Behavior Tendencies Scale for Student Teachers

The Ethical Awareness of the Psychology Undergraduates about Psychological Tests Use

A validity and reliability study of the Attitudes toward Sustainable Development scale

Applicants' success in the ethics entrance exam: A cross-sectional study

Student behavior at university: The development and validation of a 10-dimensional scale

Development of an instrument to measure medical students' perceptions of the assessment environment: initial validation

Development and preliminary validation of the moral authorship questionnaire

Academic Honesty and Its Relationship to Moral Development Among University Students

Construct validity test of evaluation tool for professional behaviors of entry-level occupational therapy students in the United States

Reliability and Validity of the Questionnaire on Social Adaptive Behavior of College Students

Academic Integrity Perceptions Among Health-Professions' Students: A Cross-Sectional Study in The Middle East

The Measure of Adolescent Heterosocial Competence: Development and Initial Validation

Predicting Students' Perceptions of Academic Misconduct on the Hogan Personality Inventory Reliability Scale