Monkeys can swing to rhythm, but not to the tune

Edwin Cartlidge

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d43978-024-00011-8

2024-01-19

Nature Italy

Abstract:Experiment suggests that full appreciation of music is not something we inherited from our non-human ancestors.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Monkeys have rhythm

Vani G. Rajendran,Juan Pablo Marquez,Luis Prado,Hugo Merchant

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.11.584468

2024-03-13

Abstract:Synchronizing movements to music is one of the hallmarks of human culture whose evolutionary and neurobiological origins remain unknown. The ability to synchronize movements requires 1) detecting a steady rhythmic pulse, or beat, out of a stream of complex sounds, 2) projecting this rhythmic pattern forward in time to predict future input, and 3) timing motor commands in anticipation of predicted future beats. Here, we demonstrate that the macaque is capable of synchronizing taps to a subjective beat in real music, and even spontaneously chooses to do so over alternative strategies. This contradicts the influential “vocal learning hypothesis” that musical beat synchronization is only possible in species with complex vocalizations such as humans and some songbirds. We propose an alternative view of musical beat perception and synchronization ability as a continuum onto which a wider range of species can be mapped depending on their ability to perform and coordinate the general abilities listed above through association with reward.

Neuroscience
Le scimmie sentono il ritmo, ma non la melodia

Edwin Cartlidge

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d43978-024-00012-7

2024-01-21

Nature Italy

Abstract:Un esperimento suggerisce che la capacità di apprezzare tutti gli aspetti della musica non è qualcosa che abbiamo ereditato dai nostri antenati.
Neural Correlates of Novelty Detection in the Primary Auditory Cortex of Behaving Monkeys

Yumei Gong,Peirun Song,Xinyu Du,Yuying Zhai,Haoxuan Xu,Hangting Ye,Xuehui Bao,Qianyue Huang,Zhiyi Tu,Pei Chen,Xuan Zhao,David Perez-Gonzalez,Manuel S. Malmierca,Xiongjie Yu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2024.113864

IF: 8.8

2024-01-01

Cell Reports

Abstract:Summary The neural mechanisms underlying novelty detection are not well understood, especially in relation to behavior. Here, we present single-unit responses from the primary auditory cortex (A1) from two monkeys trained to detect deviant tones amid repetitive ones. Results show that monkeys can detect deviant sounds, and there is a strong correlation between late neuronal responses (250–350 ms after deviant onset) and the monkeys' perceptual decisions. The magnitude and timing of both neuronal and behavioral responses are increased by larger frequency differences between the deviant and standard tones and by increasing the number of standard tones preceding the deviant. This suggests that A1 neurons encode novelty detection in behaving monkeys, influenced by stimulus relevance and expectations. This study provides evidence supporting aspects of predictive coding in the sensory cortex.
Complex Pitch Perception Mechanisms Are Shared by Humans and a New World Monkey

Xindong Song,Michael S. Osmanski,Yueqi Guo,Xiaoqin Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516120113

2015-01-01

Abstract:The perception of the pitch of harmonic complex sounds is a crucial function of human audition, especially in music and speech processing. Whether the underlying mechanisms of pitch perception are unique to humans, however, is unknown. Based on estimates of frequency resolution at the level of the auditory periphery, psychoacoustic studies in humans have revealed several primary features of central pitch mechanisms. It has been shown that (i) pitch strength of a harmonic tone is dominated by resolved harmonics; (ii) pitch of resolved harmonics is sensitive to the quality of spectral harmonicity; and (iii) pitch of unresolved harmonics is sensitive to the salience of temporal envelope cues. Here we show, for a standard musical tuning fundamental frequency of 440 Hz, that the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus), a New World monkey with a hearing range similar to that of humans, exhibits all of the primary features of central pitch mechanisms demonstrated in humans. Thus, marmosets and humans may share similar pitch perception mechanisms, suggesting that these mechanisms may have emerged early in primate evolution.
Monkeys are perceptually tuned to facial expressions that exhibit a theta-like speech rhythm

Asif A. Ghazanfar,Ryan J. Morrill,Christoph Kayser

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1214956110

IF: 11.1

2013-01-14

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract:Human speech universally exhibits a 3- to 8-Hz rhythm, corresponding to the rate of syllable production, which is reflected in both the sound envelope and the visual mouth movements. Artificial perturbation of the speech rhythm outside the natural range reduces speech intelligibility, demonstrating a perceptual tuning to this frequency band. One theory posits that the mouth movements at the core of this speech rhythm evolved through modification of ancestral primate facial expressions. Recent evidence shows that one such communicative gesture in macaque monkeys, lip-smacking, has motor parallels with speech in its rhythmicity, its developmental trajectory, and the coordination of vocal tract structures. Whether monkeys also exhibit a perceptual tuning to the natural rhythms of lip-smacking is unknown. To investigate this, we tested rhesus monkeys in a preferential-looking procedure, measuring the time spent looking at each of two side-by-side computer-generated monkey avatars lip-smacking at natural versus sped-up or slowed-down rhythms. Monkeys showed an overall preference for the natural rhythm compared with the perturbed rhythms. This lends behavioral support for the hypothesis that perceptual processes in monkeys are similarly tuned to the natural frequencies of communication signals as they are in humans. Our data provide perceptual evidence for the theory that speech may have evolved from ancestral primate rhythmic facial expressions.
Recognizing structure in novel tunes: differences between human and rats

Paola Crespo-Bojorque,Elodie Cauvet,Christophe Pallier,Juan M. Toro

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-024-01848-8

2024-03-03

Animal Cognition

Abstract:A central feature in music is the hierarchical organization of its components. Musical pieces are not a simple concatenation of chords, but are characterized by rhythmic and harmonic structures. Here, we explore if sensitivity to music structure might emerge in the absence of any experience with musical stimuli. For this, we tested if rats detect the difference between structured and unstructured musical excerpts and compared their performance with that of humans. Structured melodies were excerpts of Mozart's sonatas. Unstructured melodies were created by the recombination of fragments of different sonatas. We trained listeners (both human participants and Long-Evans rats) with a set of structured and unstructured excerpts, and tested them with completely novel excerpts they had not heard before. After hundreds of training trials, rats were able to tell apart novel structured from unstructured melodies. Human listeners required only a few trials to reach better performance than rats. Interestingly, such performance was increased in humans when tonality changes were included, while it decreased to chance in rats. Our results suggest that, with enough training, rats might learn to discriminate acoustic differences differentiating hierarchical music structures from unstructured excerpts. More importantly, the results point toward species-specific adaptations on how tonality is processed.

zoology,behavioral sciences
Neural encoding of musical expectations in a non-human primate

Roberta Bianco,Nathaniel J. Zuk,Félix Bigand,Eros Quarta,Stefano Grasso,Flavia Arnese,Andrea Ravignani,Alexandra Battaglia-Mayer,Giacomo Novembre

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2023.12.019

IF: 9.2

2024-01-23

Current Biology

Abstract:Humans naturally anticipate rhythmic and pitch patterns in music. By modeling musical expectations and neural signals, Bianco et al. compare this ability across humans and rhesus monkeys. They reveal a conserved capacity to anticipate rhythmic but not pitch patterns. This finding sheds light on the phylogeny of music perception.

cell biology,biochemistry & molecular biology,biology
These monkeys make no sense

Shahar Dubiner

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-00898-9

IF: 64.8

2024-04-04

Nature

Abstract:Nature, Published online: 03 April 2024; doi:10.1038/d41586-024-00898-9 Following the evidence.

multidisciplinary sciences
Small apes adjust rhythms to facilitate song coordination

Haigang Ma,Zidi Wang,Pu Han,Penglai Fan,Colin A Chapman,Paul A Garber,Pengfei Fan,Colin A. Chapman,Paul A. Garber

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2023.12.071

IF: 9.2

2024-03-12

Current Biology

Abstract:How do animals coordinate their vocalizations to form elaborate duets or choruses? Ma et al. find that male Nomascus gibbons adjust rhythms to facilitate female song coordination. This provides insights into the origin and evolution of song coordination in music.

cell biology,biochemistry & molecular biology,biology
Spontaneity and diversity of movement to music are not uniquely human

R Joanne Jao Keehn,John R Iversen,Irena Schulz,Aniruddh D Patel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.05.035

2019-07-08

Abstract:Spontaneous movement to music occurs in every human culture and is a foundation of dance [1]. This response to music is absent in most species (including monkeys), yet it occurs in parrots, perhaps because they (like humans, and unlike monkeys) are vocal learners whose brains contain strong auditory-motor connections, conferring sophisticated audiomotor processing abilities [2,3]. Previous research has shown that parrots can bob their heads or lift their feet in synchrony with a musical beat [2,3], but humans move to music using a wide variety of movements and body parts. Is this also true of parrots? If so, it would constrain theories of how movement to music is controlled by parrot brains. Specifically, as head bobbing is part of parrot courtship displays [4] and foot lifting is part of locomotion, these may be innate movements controlled by central pattern generators which become entrained by auditory rhythms, without the involvement of complex motor planning. This would be unlike humans, where movement to music engages cortical networks including frontal and parietal areas [5]. Rich diversity in parrot movement to music would suggest a strong contribution of forebrain regions to this behavior, perhaps including motor learning regions abutting the complex vocal-learning 'shell' regions that are unique to parrots among vocal learning birds [6]. Here we report that a sulphur-crested cockatoo (Cacatua galerita eleonora) responds to music with remarkably diverse spontaneous movements employing a variety of body parts, and suggest why parrots share this response with humans.
Human-like Pitch Perception Mechanisms in Marmoset Monkeys

Xindong Song,Yueqi Guo,Michael Osmanski,Xiaoqin Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5101530

2019-01-01

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Abstract:The perception of the pitch of harmonic complex sounds is a crucial function of human audition, especially in music and speech processing. Whether the underlying mechanisms of pitch perception are unique to humans, however, is unknown. Based on estimates of frequency resolution at the level of the auditory periphery, psychoacoustic studies in humans have revealed several primary features of central pitch mechanisms. It has been shown that (1) the pitch strength of a harmonic tone is dominated by resolved harmonics; (2) pitch of resolved harmonics is sensitive to the quality of spectral harmonicity; and (3) pitch of unresolved harmonics is sensitive to the salience of temporal envelope cues. Here, we show that, for a standard musical tuning fundamental frequency of 440 Hz (ISO 16), the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus), a New World monkey with a hearing range similar to that of humans, exhibits all the primary features of central pitch mechanisms demonstrated in humans. Thus, marmosets and humans may share similar pitch perception mechanisms, combined with previous findings of a specialized pitch processing region in both marmoset and human auditory cortex, suggesting that these mechanisms may have emerged early in primate evolution.
Context-dependent Rhythmicity in Chimpanzee Displays

Bas van der Vleuten,Veerle Hovenkamp,Judith Varkevisser,Michelle Spierings

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.10.617583

2024-10-12

Abstract:Rhythm is an important component of human language and music production. Rhythms like isochrony (intervals spaced equally in time), are also present in vocalisations of certain non-human species, including several birds and mammals. This study aimed to identify rhythmic patterns with music-based methods within display behaviour of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), humans' closest living relatives. Behavioural observations were conducted on individuals from two zoo-housed colonies. We found isochronous rhythms in vocal (e.g. pants, grunts and hoots), as well as in motoric (e.g. swaying and stomping) behavioural sequences. Among individuals, variation was found in the duration between onsets of behavioural elements, resulting in individual-specific tempi. Despite this variation in individual tempi, display sequences were consistently structured with stable, isochronous rhythms. Overall, directed displays, targeted at specific individuals, were less isochronous than undirected displays. The presence of rhythmic patterns across two independent colonies of chimpanzees, suggests that underlying mechanisms for rhythm production may be shared between humans and non-human primates. This shared mechanism indicates that the cognitive requirements for rhythm production potentially preceded human music and language evolution.

Animal Behavior and Cognition
Monkeys engage in visual simulation to solve complex problems

Aarit Ahuja,Nadira Yusif Rodriguez,Alekh Karkada Ashok,Thomas Serre,Theresa Desrochers,David Sheinberg

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.21.581495

2024-02-26

Abstract:Visual simulation — i.e., using internal reconstructions of the world to experience potential future versions of events that are not currently happening — is among the most sophisticated capacities of the human mind. But is this ability in fact uniquely human? To answer this question, we tested monkeys on a series of experiments involving the ‘Planko’ game, which we have previously used to evoke visual simulation in human participants. We found that monkeys were able to successfully play the game using a simulation strategy, predicting the trajectory of a ball through a field of planks while demonstrating a level of accuracy and behavioral signatures comparable to humans. Computational analyses further revealed that the monkeys’ strategy while playing Planko aligned with a recurrent neural network (RNN) that approached the task using a spontaneously learned simulation strategy. Finally, we carried out awake functional magnetic resonance imaging while monkeys played Planko. We found activity in motion-sensitive regions of the monkey brain during hypothesized simulation periods, even without any perceived visual motion cues. This neural result closely mirrors previous findings from human research, suggesting a shared mechanism of visual simulation across species. In all, these findings challenge traditional views of animal cognition, proposing that nonhuman primates possess a complex cognitive landscape, capable of invoking imaginative and predictive mental experiences to solve complex everyday problems.

Neuroscience
Experimental evidence for synchronization to a musical beat in a nonhuman animal

Aniruddh D Patel,John R Iversen,Micah R Bregman,Irena Schulz

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.03.038

2009-05-26

Abstract:The tendency to move in rhythmic synchrony with a musical beat (e.g., via head bobbing, foot tapping, or dance) is a human universal [1] yet is not commonly observed in other species [2]. Does this ability reflect a brain specialization for music cognition, or does it build on neural circuitry that ordinarily serves other functions? According to the "vocal learning and rhythmic synchronization" hypothesis [3], entrainment to a musical beat relies on the neural circuitry for complex vocal learning, an ability that requires a tight link between auditory and motor circuits in the brain [4, 5]. This hypothesis predicts that only vocal learning species (such as humans and some birds, cetaceans, and pinnipeds, but not nonhuman primates) are capable of synchronizing movements to a musical beat. Here we report experimental evidence for synchronization to a beat in a sulphur-crested cockatoo (Cacatua galerita eleonora). By manipulating the tempo of a musical excerpt across a wide range, we show that the animal spontaneously adjusts the tempo of its rhythmic movements to stay synchronized with the beat. These findings indicate that synchronization to a musical beat is not uniquely human and suggest that animal models can provide insights into the neurobiology and evolution of human music [6].
Isochronous rhythms: Facilitating song coordination across taxa?

Dena Jane Clink

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2024.01.020

IF: 9.2

2024-03-12

Current Biology

Abstract:The biological expression of isochronous rhythms — rhythms like those produced by a metronome — was once thought to be unique to humans. A new study reports that faster and more isochronous rhythms lead to more successful duets in singing gibbons: isochronous rhythms might be an important component of song coordination across taxa.

cell biology,biochemistry & molecular biology,biology
Rhythmic cognition in humans and animals: distinguishing meter and pulse perception

W Tecumseh Fitch

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2013.00068

2013-10-31

Abstract:This paper outlines a cognitive and comparative perspective on human rhythmic cognition that emphasizes a key distinction between pulse perception and meter perception. Pulse perception involves the extraction of a regular pulse or "tactus" from a stream of events. Meter perception involves grouping of events into hierarchical trees with differing levels of "strength", or perceptual prominence. I argue that metrically-structured rhythms are required to either perform or move appropriately to music (e.g., to dance). Rhythms, from this metrical perspective, constitute "trees in time." Rhythmic syntax represents a neglected form of musical syntax, and warrants more thorough neuroscientific investigation. The recent literature on animal entrainment clearly demonstrates the capacity to extract the pulse from rhythmic music, and to entrain periodic movements to this pulse, in several parrot species and a California sea lion, and a more limited ability to do so in one chimpanzee. However, the ability of these or other species to infer hierarchical rhythmic trees remains, for the most part, unexplored (with some apparent negative results from macaques). The results from this animal comparative research, combined with new methods to explore rhythmic cognition neurally, provide exciting new routes for understanding not just rhythmic cognition, but hierarchical cognition more generally, from a biological and neural perspective.
Humans (Homo sapiens) but not baboons (Papio papio) demonstrate crossmodal pitch‐luminance correspondence

Konstantina Margiotoudi,Joel Fagot,Adrien Meguerditchian,Isabelle Dautriche

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.23613

2024-03-14

American Journal of Primatology

Abstract:Humans spontaneously associate high‐pitched sounds with bright objects and low‐pitched sounds with dark objects, but not baboons (Papio papio). This result questions the presence of a shared cross‐modal pitch‐luminance mapping between humans and nonhuman primates. Humans spontaneously and consistently map information coming from different sensory modalities. Surprisingly, the phylogenetic origin of such cross‐modal correspondences has been under‐investigated. A notable exception is the study of Ludwig et al. (Visuoauditory mappings between high luminance and high pitch are shared by chimpanzees [Pan troglodytes] and humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(51), 20661–20665) which reports that both humans and chimpanzees spontaneously map high‐pitched sounds with bright objects and low‐pitched sounds with dark objects. Our pre‐registered study aimed to directly replicate this research on both humans and baboons (Papio papio), an old world monkey which is more phylogenetically distant from humans than chimpanzees. Following Ludwig et al. participants were presented with a visual classification task where they had to sort black and white square (low and high luminance), while background sounds (low or high‐pitched tones) were playing. Whereas we replicated the finding that humans' performance on the visual task was affected by congruency between sound and luminance of the target, we did not find any of those effects on baboons' performance. These results question the presence of a shared cross‐modal pitch‐luminance mapping in other nonhuman primates.

zoology
Monkeys overestimate connected arrays in a relative quantity task: A reverse connectedness illusion

Michael J. Beran,Maisy D. Englund,Elizabeth L. Haseltine,Christian Agrillo,Audrey E. Parrish

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-024-02977-5

2024-11-27

Attention Perception & Psychophysics

Abstract:Humans and many other species show consistent patterns of responding when making relative quantity ("more or less") judgments of stimuli. This includes the well-established ratio effect that determines the degree of discriminability among sets of items according to Weber's Law. However, humans and other species also are susceptible to some errors in accurately representing quantity, and these illusions reflect important aspects of the relation of perception to quantity representation. One newly described illusion in humans is the connectedness illusion, in which arrays with items that are connected to each other tend to be underestimated relative to arrays without such connection. In this pre-registered report, we assessed whether this illusion occurred in other species, testing rhesus macaque monkeys and capuchin monkeys. Contrary to our pre-registered predictions, monkeys showed an opposite bias to humans, preferring to select arrays with connected items as being more numerous. Thus, monkeys do not show this illusion to the same extent as humans.

psychology, experimental
Finding the Beat: From Socially Coordinated Vocalizations in Songbirds to Rhythmic Entrainment in Humans

Jonathan I Benichov,Eitan Globerson,Ofer Tchernichovski

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00255

2016-06-06

Abstract:Humans and oscine songbirds share the rare capacity for vocal learning. Songbirds have the ability to acquire songs and calls of various rhythms through imitation. In several species, birds can even coordinate the timing of their vocalizations with other individuals in duets that are synchronized with millisecond-accuracy. It is not known, however, if songbirds can perceive rhythms holistically nor if they are capable of spontaneous entrainment to complex rhythms, in a manner similar to humans. Here we review emerging evidence from studies of rhythm generation and vocal coordination across songbirds and humans. In particular, recently developed experimental methods have revealed neural mechanisms underlying the temporal structure of song and have allowed us to test birds' abilities to predict the timing of rhythmic social signals. Surprisingly, zebra finches can readily learn to anticipate the calls of a "vocal robot" partner and alter the timing of their answers to avoid jamming, even in reference to complex rhythmic patterns. This capacity resembles, to some extent, human predictive motor response to an external beat. In songbirds, this is driven, at least in part, by the forebrain song system, which controls song timing and is essential for vocal learning. Building upon previous evidence for spontaneous entrainment in human and non-human vocal learners, we propose a comparative framework for future studies aimed at identifying shared mechanism of rhythm production and perception across songbirds and humans.
The Evolution of Music in Comparative Perspective

W T. FITCH

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1360.004

IF: 6.499

2005-12-01

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Abstract:In this paper, I briefly review some comparative data that provide an empirical basis for research on the evolution of music making in humans. First, a brief comparison of music and language leads to discussion of design features of music, suggesting a deep connection between the biology of music and language. I then selectively review data on animal "music." Examining sound production in animals, we find examples of repeated convergent evolution or analogy (the evolution of vocal learning of complex songs in birds, whales, and seals). A fascinating but overlooked potential homology to instrumental music is provided by manual percussion in African apes. Such comparative behavioral data, combined with neuroscientific and developmental data, provide an important starting point for any hypothesis about how or why human music evolved. Regarding these functional and phylogenetic questions, I discuss some previously proposed functions of music, including Pinker's "cheesecake" hypothesis; Darwin's and others' sexual selection model; Dunbar's group "grooming" hypothesis; and Trehub's caregiving model. I conclude that only the last hypothesis receives strong support from currently available data. I end with a brief synopsis of Darwin's model of a songlike musical "protolanguage," concluding that Darwin's model is consistent with much of the available evidence concerning the evolution of both music and language. There is a rich future for empirical investigations of the evolution of music, both in investigations of individual differences among humans, and in interspecific investigations of musical abilities in other animals, especially those of our ape cousins, about which we know little.

multidisciplinary sciences

Monkeys can swing to rhythm, but not to the tune

Monkeys have rhythm

Le scimmie sentono il ritmo, ma non la melodia

Neural Correlates of Novelty Detection in the Primary Auditory Cortex of Behaving Monkeys

Complex Pitch Perception Mechanisms Are Shared by Humans and a New World Monkey

Monkeys are perceptually tuned to facial expressions that exhibit a theta-like speech rhythm

Recognizing structure in novel tunes: differences between human and rats

Neural encoding of musical expectations in a non-human primate

These monkeys make no sense

Small apes adjust rhythms to facilitate song coordination

Spontaneity and diversity of movement to music are not uniquely human

Human-like Pitch Perception Mechanisms in Marmoset Monkeys

Context-dependent Rhythmicity in Chimpanzee Displays

Monkeys engage in visual simulation to solve complex problems

Experimental evidence for synchronization to a musical beat in a nonhuman animal

Isochronous rhythms: Facilitating song coordination across taxa?

Rhythmic cognition in humans and animals: distinguishing meter and pulse perception

Humans (Homo sapiens) but not baboons (Papio papio) demonstrate crossmodal pitch‐luminance correspondence

Monkeys overestimate connected arrays in a relative quantity task: A reverse connectedness illusion

Finding the Beat: From Socially Coordinated Vocalizations in Songbirds to Rhythmic Entrainment in Humans

The Evolution of Music in Comparative Perspective