Abstract:Background: Pleural effusion is a fluid buildup in the pleural space that mostly result from congestive heart failure, bacterial pneumonia, malignancy, and pulmonary embolism. The diagnosis of this condition can be challenging as it presents symptoms that may overlap with other conditions; therefore, imaging diagnostic tools such as chest x-ray/radiograph (CXR), point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS), and computed tomography (CT) have been employed to make an accurate diagnosis. Although POCUS has high diagnostic accuracy, it is yet to be considered a first-line diagnostic tool as most physicians use radiography. Therefore, the current meta-analysis was designed to compare POCUS to chest radiography. Methods: n extended search for studies related to our topic was done on five electronic databases, including PubMed, Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar. A quality assessment using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool (QUADAS-2) was performed on all eligible articles obtained from the databases. Moreover, the diagnostic accuracy of POCUS and CXR was performed using STATA 16 software. Results: Our search yielded 1642 articles, of which only 18 were eligible for inclusion and analysis. The pooled analysis showed that POCUS had a higher diagnostic accuracy compared to CXR (94.54% (95% CI 91.74-97.34) vs. 67.68% (95% CI 58.29-77.08) and 97.88% (95% CI 95.77-99.99) vs. 85.30% (95% CI 80.06-90.54) sensitivity and specificity, respectively). A subgroup analysis based on the position of patients during examinations showed that POCUS carried out in supine and upright positions had higher specificity than other POCUS positions (99%). In comparison, lateral decubitus CXR had higher sensitivity (96%) and specificity (99%) than the other CXR positions. Further subgroup analyses demonstrated that CXR had higher specificity in studies that included more than 100 patients (92.74% (95% CI 85.41-100). Moreover, CXR tends to have a higher diagnostic accuracy when other CXR positions are used as reference tests (93.38% (95% CI 86.30-100) and 98.51% (95% CI 94.65-100) sensitivity and specificity, respectively). Conclusion: POCUS as an imaging modality has higher diagnostic accuracy than CXR in detecting pleural effusion. Moreover, the accuracy is still high even when performed by physicians with less POCUS training. Therefore, we suggest it is considered a first-line imaging tool for diagnosing pleural effusion at the patients' bedside.

Point-of-care lung ultrasound optimization scheme for the assessment of cardiogenic pulmonary edema: A promising tool

The application of contrast enhanced ultrasound for core needle biopsy of subpleural pulmonary lesions: retrospective analysis in 92 patients

Comparison of test bolus and bolus tracking techniques for dual-energy CT lung perfusion scan

Identification Value of Contrast-Enhanced Sonography on Peripheral Pulmonary Cancer

Point-of-care ultrasound using B-lines in the assessment of cardiogenic pulmonary edema

The Role of Chest Ultrasound Combined with Plasma Brain Natriuretic Peptide in The Differentiation between Cardiogenic and Noncardiogenic Pulmonary Edema

The LUSBI Protocol (Lung Ultrasound/BREST Score/Inferior Vena Cava)-Its Role in a Differential Diagnostic Approach to Dyspnea of Cardiogenic and Non-Cardiogenic Origin

Diagnostic efficacy of lung ultrasound in cardiogenic pulmonary edema: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

[Assessment of Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Induced Lung Volume Change by Ultrasound in Mechanically Ventilated Patients].

Predictive value of chest ultrasound in differentiation between cardiogenic and noncardiogenic pulmonary edema: a cross-sectional study

Accuracy of point-of-care lung ultrasonography for the diagnosis of cardiogenic pulmonary edema in dogs and cats with acute dyspnea

Diagnostic efficacy of perfusion scans interpreted by PISA-PED criteria for pulmonary embolism:comparison with CTPA

Utility and Diagnostic Test Properties of Pulmonary and Cardiovascular Point of Care Ultra-sonography (POCUS) in COVID-19 patients admitted to critical care unit.

Utility of Point-of-Care Lung Ultrasound for Clinical Classification of COVID-19

Point‐of‐care ultrasound for aiding diagnosis of congestive heart failure in the emergency department: A narrative review

Role of chest ultrasound to differentiate between acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema and non-cardiogenic pulmonary edema (acute respiratory distress syndrome)

Diagnostic Efficacy of Lung Perfusion Scan Interpreted by PISAPED Criteria for Pulmonary Embolism: Comparison with CTPA

Relationship between lung ultrasound and electrical impedance tomography as regional assessment tools during PEEP titration in acute respiratory distress syndrome caused by multi-lobar pneumonia: a pilot study

Agreement of point of care ultrasound and final clinical diagnosis in patients with acute heart failure, acute coronary syndrome, and shock: POCUS not missing the target

Advancement in pleura effusion diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of point-of-care ultrasound versus radiographic thoracic imaging

Comparative analysis and clinical application of imaging methods for diagnosis of pulmonary embolism