Abstract:Twenty‐five years ago, Davis Young challenged Christian scholars to collaborate to develop a viable position that took into account both the antiquity of the human race and the cardinal doctrines of humanity and sin. This BioLogos‐funded project attempts to do this. All assume the evolutionary development of humanity and attempt to show how essential Christian doctrines can respond. Section titles make this obvious: "The Image of God and Evolution," "Original Sin and Evolution" and "Evil and Evolution." The first section addresses the meaning of the image of God from various viewpoints: functional (humans have been given a task) by Harris; structural (humanity has some inherent quality) by Visala; relational (the nature of the Godhead corresponds to various human relationships) by Oord; and dynamic (the eschatological end intended for humanity) by Peters. The second section deals with original sin. Several contributors stress the distinction between the originating (or causing) sin of the first humans and originated (caused) sin of subsequent descendants. Pinsent, develops an Augustinian approach; Collins, a federal headship explanation; McCoy, an Irenaean method; Toren, a cultural spread model; and Hays, a non‐historical account. The final section turns to theodicy. One of the best essays is Rosenberg's work on how Augustine's privation model need not exclude decay prior to the fall. Lloyd discusses the role of non‐human agency, while the Irenaean approach is set out by Swinburne. In the final two articles, Southgate sets out a free‐process model, while Vitale sets out an intriguing approach he calls non‐identity theodicy. Apart from summary work by the associate editors, there is little interaction between approaches. No attempt is made to come to one conclusion. However, it does demonstrate that cardinal doctrines need not be abandoned because of evolutionary theory. The goal is well‐expressed in the subtitle of one essay: "Creating Space at the Interface of Modern Science and the Christian Tradition."

Power, Possibility, and Personal Agency: What Should Ethics Know of Sin?

Erik H. Erikson and the deep context of ministry

Notes on "bioethics and sin" by Jean-Francois Collange

Communal sin, atonement, and group non-agential moral responsibility

Postoperative Complications Associated With Reduction Malarplasty via Intraoral Approach: A Meta Analysis

FINDING OURSELVES AFTER DARWIN: CONVERSATIONS ON THE IMAGE OF GOD, ORIGINAL SIN, AND THE PROBLEM OF EVIL. Edited by Stanley P.Rosenberg. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2018. Pp. vii + 384. $34.00.

Digital Sin: A Theological Review of Human Sins through Audio-Visual in Digital Realm

God in the Face of Natural and Moral Evils: A Thomistic Approach

Philo On Free Will And Sin

Anxiety, Guilt, and Shame in the Atonement

Is Conscience Best Understood as a Particular Form of Consciousness? Theological and Ethical Reflections Inspired by the Phenomenology of Maurice Merleau-Ponty

Conceptualizing the Atonement

The Loss of the Sense of Sin and the Arrogance of Life: Challenges for Today’s Evangelization

Schēma: A Semantic Puzzle—Some Hermeneutical and Translational Difficulties about Philippians 2:7d

Business Ethics from the Standpoint of Redemption: Adorno on the Possibility of Good Work

The Logic of Reparative Substitution: Contemporary Restitution Models of Atonement, Divine Justice, and Somatic Death

Against the Natural Consciousness of Time: Trauma and Ethics in Jean Améry's Beyond Guilt and Atonement

Attachment Theory and the Cry of Dereliction

Overcoming Redemption: Neoliberalism, Atonement, and the Logic of Debt

Notes on a Method: Engaging with Augustine at the Intersection of Philosophy, Theology, and History