Abstract:The authors reported no conflicts of interest.The Journal policy requires editors and reviewers to disclose conflicts of interest and to decline handling or reviewing manuscripts for which they may have a conflict of interest. The editors and reviewers of this article have no conflicts of interest. The authors reported no conflicts of interest. The Journal policy requires editors and reviewers to disclose conflicts of interest and to decline handling or reviewing manuscripts for which they may have a conflict of interest. The editors and reviewers of this article have no conflicts of interest. In 1995, a study conducted by North American Lung Cancer Study Group compared sublobar resection and lobectomy for patients with T1N0 non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and its results consolidated the status of standard lobectomy.1Ginsberg R.J. Rubinstein L.V. Randomized trial of lobectomy versus limited resection for T1 N0 non–small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer Study Group.Ann Thorac Surg. 1995; 60: 615-623Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (2434) Google Scholar In recent years, sublobar resection for the treatment of early-stage NSCLC has aroused widespread and ongoing controversy and discussion. In the JCOG0201 study, tumor size ≤3 cm and consolidation tumor ratio (CTR) ≤0.5 showed an excellent prognosis and potentially suitable for sublobar resection.2Ito H. Suzuki K. Mizutani T. Aokage K. Wakabayashi M. Fukuda H. et al.Long-term survival outcome after lobectomy in patients with clinical T1 N0 lung cancer.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. January 11, 2020; ([Epub ahead of print])Google Scholar Based on this result, several clinical trials, including JCOG0802, JCOG0804, and JCOG1211, were designed to explore the potential benefited population for sublobar resection.3Nakagawa K. Watanabe S.I. Kunitoh H. Asamura H. The Lung Cancer Surgical Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group: past activities, current status and future direction.Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2017; 47: 194-199Crossref PubMed Scopus (19) Google Scholar At the 101st American Association for Thoracic Surgery annual meeting in 2021, Nakagawa and colleagues3Nakagawa K. Watanabe S.I. Kunitoh H. Asamura H. The Lung Cancer Surgical Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group: past activities, current status and future direction.Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2017; 47: 194-199Crossref PubMed Scopus (19) Google Scholar reported the incredible result of JCOG0802. This phase 3 trial enrolled the patients with invasive peripheral NSCLC (maximum tumor diameter ≤2 cm and CTR >0.5) who were randomly assigned to lobectomy or segmentectomy. The 5-year overall survival was 94.3% for segmentectomy and 91.1% for lobectomy. However, several issues remain unclear. First of all, why did the segmentectomy group have greater local recurrence proportion (10.5% vs 5.4%) but better prognosis? It must be noted that 52 (63%) of 83 patients in the lobectomy group died of other cancer including second lung cancer, or non-neoplastic diseases compared with 27 (47%) of 58 patients in segmentectomy arm. Therefore, does the advantage of prognosis in segmentectomy come from the benefit of other cancer or nontumor factors? The lung cancer–specific survival should be considered as one of the evaluation indicators. Under the premise of similar baseline clinicopathologic characteristics, the segmentectomy arm had better protection of respiratory function than lobectomy (decreased forced expiratory volume in 1 second, 6 months: 10.4% vs 13.1%, 1 year: 8.5% vs 12.0%, P < .001, respectively), which may be reflected in reduced death from non-neoplastic diseases. In particular, the study included 38% (422) of patients ≥70 years, and the protection of lung function was probably particularly important. Further analysis of the prognostic differences between the 2 groups at different ages is necessary. Is lobectomy more suitable for younger patients whereas segmentectomy more suitable for older patients? Can we speculate that in early lung cancer, the benefit of lobectomy is mainly reflected in tumor recurrence, whereas the benefit of segmentectomy is manifested in nontumor diseases? What's more, considering some of patients received adjuvant therapy, it should be disclosed that the genetic mutations situations of patients with or without local recurrence and whether they received other treatments, for example, second surgery, targeted therapy, radiotherapy, etc. Second, 553 (50%) patients had the nodules with CTR = 1.0. It was generally believed that solid components were a factor of poor prognosis4Hattori A. Suzuki K. Takamochi K. Wakabayashi M. Aokage K. Saji H. et al.Prognostic impact of a ground-glass opacity component in clinical stage IA non–small cell lung cancer.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021; 161: 1469-1480Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (68) Google Scholar and lobectomy was the optimal option for the solid nodules. In the JCOG 0201 study, patients with tumor size ≤2 cm and CTR >0.5 undergone lobectomy showed 84.1% 10-year overall survival.2Ito H. Suzuki K. Mizutani T. Aokage K. Wakabayashi M. Fukuda H. et al.Long-term survival outcome after lobectomy in patients with clinical T1 N0 lung cancer.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. January 11, 2020; ([Epub ahead of print])Google Scholar The median follow-up was 7.3 years in JCOG 0802. It is not clear whether the survival advantage of segmentectomy will persist if follow-up time is extended to 10 years or longer. Last but not least, JCOG0802 does not demonstrate the specific pathologic types and subtypes of 2 arms. Considering that 88% (968) of them were lung adenocarcinoma, it remains unknown whether segmentectomy can be applied to nonadenocarcinoma NSCLC, or whether segmentectomy can maintain a survival advantage for solid, papillary, or micropapillary-subtyped lung adenocarcinoma. Besides, since visceral pleural invasion, vascular invasion,5Tsutani Y. Suzuki K. Koike T. Wakabayashi M. Mizutani T. Aokage K. et al.High-risk factors for recurrence of stage I lung adenocarcinoma: follow-up data from JCOG0201.Ann Thorac Surg. 2019; 108: 1484-1490Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (24) Google Scholar tumor spread through air space,6Lu S. Tan K.S. Kadota K. Eguchi T. Bains S. Rekhtman N. et al.Spread through air spaces (STAS) is an independent predictor of recurrence and lung cancer-specific death in squamous cell carcinoma.J Thorac Oncol. 2017; 12: 223-234Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (122) Google Scholar and margin are the high-risk factors for recurrence of stage I lung adenocarcinoma, people need the information in JCOG0802 about pathologic features, resection margins, and margin/tumor size rate. The survival analysis of specific lung segments, the numbers and stations of lymph nodes, and proportion of metastasized lymph nodes also should be disclosed. Before we change the long-term standard treatment strategy for T1N0 NSCLC, further analysis is necessary to identify the best potential benefited population for segmentectomy. We thank Dr Zi-Hao Chen for his help.

Lobar or sublobar resection of peripheral stage I non-small cell lung cancer

Sublobar Resection vs Lobectomy for High-Risk Stage I Non–Small Cell Lung Carcinoma

Sublobar Resection vs Lobectomy for Stage IA Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma—Takeaways From Modern Randomized Trials

Sublobar Resection Is Associated With Better Perioperative Outcomes In Elderly Patients With Clinical Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

Segmentectomy for NSCLC: a Better Alternative?

Sublobar or Lobar Resection in Early-Stage Peripheral Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Less Than 2cm: a Meta-Analysis for Randomized Controlled Trials

Oncological Outcomes of Sub-Lobar Resection Versus Lobectomy for Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Lobectomy Versus Sublobar Resection for Stage I (T1-T2an0m0) Small Cell Lung Cancer: A SEER Population-Based Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

[Current Situation and Confusion of Sublobar Resection for Early Stage Lung Cancer].

Long term outcomes after lobar versus sublobar resection for patients with Non-Small cell lung Cancer: Systematic review and individual patient data Meta-Analysis

Sublobectomy Versus Lobectomy for Long-Term Survival Outcomes of Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with a Tumor Size ≤2 Cm Accompanied by Visceral Pleural Invasion: a SEER Population-Based Study

Sublobar Resection for Lung Adenocarcinoma Less Than 2 Cm Containing Solid or Micropapillary Components Radiologically Presented As Consolidation-to-tumor Ratio (CTR) ≤0.25 [Ground-Glass Opacity (GGO)]

Is Sublobar Resection Feasible for High-Risk Pathologic Stage I Non-small Cell Lung Cancer?

Prognostic Impact of Lymphadenectomy on Outcomes of Sublobar Resection for Stage IA Non–small Cell Lung Cancer ≤2 Cm

Survival Rates after Lobectomy, Segmentectomy, and Wedge Resection for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Is Lobectomy Actually Worse Than Segmentectomy for All Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer?

Sublobar Resections for Small-Sized Stage Ia Lung Adenocarcinoma: a Sino-Japanese Multicenter Study

Potential Benefited Population for Sublobar Resection

Surgery for advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer: lobectomy or sub-lobar resection?

Sublobectomy Versus Lobectomy for Stage I Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer, A Meta-Analysis of Published Studies

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes after Thoracoscopic Sublobectomy Versus Lobectomy for Stage I Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis