Abstract:This article addresses the relationship between consolidated financial statements and achievement of global tax policy objectives (OECD BEPS) against the background of a case study. Major instruments for preventing tax avoidance are strongly linked with consolidated financial statements. Irrespective of the accounting standard applied (IFRS, US GAAP, and German GAAP), a systematic gap in the group accounting regulations regarding the effective inclusion of entities without members and shareholdings in the consolidated financial statements can be shown. This applies to foundations that are set up as structured entities. The non-inclusion of such legal entities in the consolidated financial statements considerably jeopardises the information function and the core objectives of group accounting. Furthermore, the tax policy goals of the European Union (EU) or Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) to combat cross-border profit shifting and tax avoidance (BEPS) are negatively affected, as relevant instruments such as the interest limitation rule according to Art. 4 of the Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive (ATAD) are linked to the consolidated financial statements. In addition, the hybrid mismatch rule under Art. 9 ATAD is affected, as their scope of application relates to entities that are fully included in consolidated financial statements drawn up in accordance with the IFRS or the national financial reporting system. The same applies to CFC taxation under Art. 7 ATAD, which is based on the concept of control of the foreign entity (majority of the voting rights, capital interest or more than 50% of the profits). The effectiveness of the inclusion rules of the group accounting regulations has a significant international tax policy dimension and superior economic relevance. Thus, the study develops solutions to include structured foundations and entities without members in the consolidated financial statements. Furthermore, solutions for the further development of the OECD base erosion and profit shifting instruments connected to group accounting are presented to achieve global tax policy goals.

Third‐party reporting and cross‐border tax planning

The Role of Country by Country Reporting in the Regulation of Aggressive Tax Planning Strategies Employed by Multinational Enterprises

Does Private Country-by-Country Reporting Deter Tax Avoidance and Income Shifting? Evidence from BEPS Action Item 13

International tax planning within the structure of corporate entities owned by the shareholder‐individuals through Panama Papers destinations

Assessing the Influence of Country-by-Country Reporting (CbCr) on Cross-Border Related Party Transactions: Insights from China

Public Country-by-Country Reporting: Corporate Law, Fiscal Law and the Principle of Unanimity

Consolidated financial statements and global tax policy (OECD BEPS) insights from a multijurisdictional case study

The Flaw in the Plan: Information Transparency and International Tax Avoidance Channels

Regulatory avoidance responses to private Country-by-Country Reporting

Did the Adoption of BEPS Country-by-Country Reporting Affect Multinational Tax Avoidance? Evidence from Canada

On the Interdependency of Profit Shifting Channels and the Effectiveness of Anti-Avoidance Legislation

Base Erosion, Profit Shifting and Developing Countries

The effect of mandatory extraction payment disclosures on corporate tax avoidance: evidence from the United Kingdom

Leveling the playing field: Constraints on multinational profit shifting and the performance of national firms

The long way to tax transparency: lessons from the early publishers of country-by-country reports

Anti-avoidance Legislation of Scandinavian Countries with Reference to the 2014 Corporate Income Tax Burden of the Thirty-Four OECD Member States: Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden Compared

Tax governance: how the EU supports third countries

INTERNATIONAL CORPORATE TAX AVOIDANCE: A REVIEW OF THE CHANNELS, MAGNITUDES, AND BLIND SPOTS

Board Level Employee Representation and Tax Avoidance in Europe

Thin Capitalisation Rules: A Second-Best Solution to the Cross-Border Debt Bias?

Digital regulation and multinational tax avoidance: evidence from Common Reporting Standard