Distal Versus Proximal Arm Improvement Following Paired Vagus Nerve Stimulation Therapy After Chronic Stroke

Isha Vora,Perman Gochyyev,Navzer Engineer,Steven L Wolf,Teresa Kimberley
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2024.05.018
IF: 4.06
2024-05-31
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Abstract:Objective To evaluate differences in upper extremity (UE) segment-specific (proximal or distal segment) recovery after Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) paired with UE rehabilitation (Paired-VNS) compared to rehabilitation with sham-VNS (Control). We also assessed whether gains in specific UE segments predicted clinically meaningful improvement. Design This study reports on a secondary analysis of the randomized, triple-blinded, sham-controlled pivotal VNS-REHAB trial. A Rasch latent regression was used to determine differences between Paired-VNS and Controls for distal and proximal UE changes after in-clinic therapy and 3-months later. Subsequently, we ran a random forest model to assess candidate predictors of meaningful improvement. Each item of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity and Wolf Motor Function Test was evaluated as a predictor of response to treatment. Setting Data analyzed in this study were obtained from the completed VNS-REHAB trial. Participants received intensive UE rehabilitation from physical and occupational therapists in an outpatient setting for 6 weeks, followed by a home-based exercise program. Participants Dataset included 108 participants with chronic ischemic stroke and moderate-to-severe UE impairments. Interventions N/A Main Outcome Measures Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) and Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) Results Distal UE improvement was significantly greater in the Paired-VNS group compared to Controls immediately post-therapy (95% CI [0.27-0.73], p ≤0.001) and after 3-months (95% CI [0.16-0.75], p =0.003). Both groups showed similar improvement in proximal UE at both time points. A subset of both distal and proximal items from the FMA-UE and WMFT were predictors of meaningful improvement. Conclusions Paired-VNS improved distal UE impairment in chronic stroke to a greater degree than intensive rehabilitation alone. Proximal improvements were equally responsive to either treatment. Given that meaningful UE recovery is predicted by improvements across both proximal and distal segments, Paired-VNS may facilitate improvement that is otherwise elusive.
rehabilitation,sport sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?