Comparative Study of the Insulator-Hall Liquid-Insulator Transitions: Composite Boson Picture vs Composite Fermion Picture

Wenjun Zheng,Yue Yu,Zhaobin Su
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.cond-mat/9710196
1997-12-06
Abstract:Based on a newly advanced phenomenological understanding of the high-field insulator- Hall liquid transition in a composite fermion picture, we extend its composite boson counterpart to the analysis of the low-field insulator-Hall liquid transition. We thus achieve a comparative study of these two transitions. In this way, the similar reflection symmetries in filling factors in both transitions are understood consistently as due to the symmetry of the gapful excitations which dominate $\sigma_{xx}$ across the transitions, and the abrupt change in $\sigma_{xy}$ at the transitions. The substantially different characteristic energy scales involved in these two transitions can be attributed to the differences in critical filling factors $\nu_c$ and the effective masses. The opposite temperature-dependences of the critical longitudinal resistivities are also well-understood, which can be traced to the opposite statistical natures of the composite fermion and the composite boson. We also give a tentative discussion of the zero-temperature dissipative conductivity. The above results are supported by a recent experiment (<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="cond-mat/9708239" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/9708239">cond-mat/9708239</a>).
Mesoscale and Nanoscale Physics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper aims to address the similarities and differences between the insulator - Hall liquid transitions in low - and high - magnetic - field quantum Hall effect systems. Specifically, the author analyzes the insulator - Hall liquid transition in low - magnetic - field by extending the Composite Fermion (CF) theory to the Composite Boson (CB) theory, and conducts a comparative study with the Hall liquid - insulator transition in high - magnetic - field. ### The main problems solved in the paper include: 1. **Explanation of similarities**: - The paper explores the similar properties in low - magnetic - field (LF) and high - magnetic - field (HF) transitions, such as the approximate equality of the critical longitudinal resistivity \(\rho_c\) and the reflection symmetry of \(\rho_{xx}\). - These similar properties can be explained by the symmetry of gap excitation and the sudden change of \(\sigma_{xx}\) across the transition. 2. **Explanation of differences**: - The paper explains the different characteristic energy scales in low - and high - magnetic - field transitions, which are mainly attributed to the differences in the critical filling factor \(\nu_c\) and the effective mass. - The temperature dependence of the critical longitudinal resistivity in low - and high - magnetic - field transitions is opposite, which can be traced back to the different statistical properties of composite fermions and composite bosons. 3. **Discussion of zero - temperature dissipative conductivity**: - The paper conducts a preliminary discussion on zero - temperature dissipative conductivity, proposes a model based on the quantum tunneling probability, and obtains results consistent with experimental data. ### Specific formulas and conclusions: - **Temperature dependence of critical longitudinal resistivity**: - For high - magnetic - field transition: \[ \rho_{xx}^H(\nu, T) = \rho_H^c \exp\left(-\frac{\Delta\nu}{\alpha_H T + \beta_H}\right) \] - For low - magnetic - field transition: \[ \rho_{xx}^L(\nu, T) = \rho_L^c \exp\left(\frac{\Delta\nu}{\alpha_L T + \beta_L}\right) \] where \(\Delta\nu = \nu - \nu_c\), and \(\alpha_H\) and \(\alpha_L\) are sample - dependent parameters. - **Calculation of effective mass**: - In low - magnetic - field transition: \[ \alpha_L = \frac{2\pi k_B m_{CB}^* \nu_L^2}{h^2 n} \] - In high - magnetic - field transition: \[ \alpha_H = \frac{2\pi k_B m_{CF}^* \nu_H^2}{h^2 n} \] Estimated from experimental data: \[ m_{CB}^* \approx 9 m_b, \quad m_{CF}^* \approx 6 m_b \] where \(m_b = 0.1 m_e\). - **Zero - temperature dissipative conductivity**: - The quantum tunneling probability \(p(T = 0)\) is proportional to \(\sigma_{xx}(T = 0)\): \[ p(T = 0) \propto \exp\left(-\frac{d^2}{2 l_{B^*}^2}\right) \] - where \(d \approx \frac{1}{\sqrt{n}}\), \(l_{B^*} = \sqrt{\frac{\hbar}{e B^*}}\), \(\nu^* = \frac{n h}{e B^*}\), \(\nu^* = \frac{\nu \nu_c}{|\Delta\nu|}\).