Aida X. El-Khadra
Abstract:We present an exploratory study for the nonperturbative determination of the coefficient of the ${\cal O}(a)$ improvement term to the Wilson action, $c_{SW}$. Following the work by Lüscher et al., we impose the PCAC relation as a nonperturbative improvement condition on $c_{SW}$, without, however, using the Schrödinger functional in our calculation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to determine the coefficient \( c_{SW} \) of the O(a) improvement term in the Wilson action by non - perturbative methods in order to reduce the discretization error in lattice QCD calculations. Specifically, the author hopes to determine \( c_{SW} \) more accurately by using the partially conserved axial - vector current (PCAC) relationship as a non - perturbative improvement condition, without relying on the Schrödinger functional.
### Background and Motivation
In lattice quantum chromodynamics (Lattice QCD), the improved action can significantly reduce the discretization error, thereby improving the accuracy of numerical simulations. The Sheikholeslami - Wohlert action is a common improved action, and its form is:
\[
S_{\text{lat}} = a^4 \sum_x \left[ m_0 \bar{\psi} \psi + \bar{\psi} D_{/L} \psi - \frac{1}{2} ar \bar{\psi} \Delta_L \psi + i \frac{c_{SW}}{4} \bar{\psi} \sigma_{\mu\nu} F_L^{\mu\nu} \psi \right]
\]
where \( D_{/L}^\mu \) and \( \Delta_L \) are the discretized forms of the covariant derivative and the Laplacian operator, and \( F_L^{\mu\nu} \) is the clover - leaf approximation of the field - strength tensor. At the tree - level approximation, \( c_{SW} = 1 \), while in the loop - diagram correction, the expression of \( c_{SW} \) is more complicated.
### Application of the PCAC Relationship
To determine \( c_{SW} \), the author introduced the partially conserved axial - vector current (PCAC) relationship. In the continuous limit, the PCAC relationship is:
\[
\partial_\mu A_\mu(x) = 2mP(x)
\]
But on the lattice, due to the lattice - spacing effect, this relationship needs to be O(a) - improved:
\[
A_I^\mu(x) = A^\mu(x) + c_A \partial_\mu P(x) + O(a^2)
\]
The improved PCAC relationship becomes:
\[
\partial_\mu \langle A_I^\mu(x) \Pi(0) \rangle = 2m \langle P(x) \Pi(0) \rangle + O(a^2)
\]
By choosing different operators \( \Pi \) or momentum dependencies, conditions sensitive to \( c_{SW} \) can be constructed, thereby determining its value.
### Methods and Results
The author used lattice data with two different \( c_{SW} \) values and studied the influence of time - dependence and momentum - dependence on \( \Delta M \). The results show that momentum - dependence is a sensitive tool and can effectively determine the non - perturbative value of \( c_{SW} \). In particular, when \( c_{SW} \) is close to 1.69, \( \Delta M \) is closer to zero, indicating that the non - perturbative value of \( c_{SW} \) may be greater than \( \frac{1}{u_0^3} \) obtained from tadpole improvement.
### Conclusion
This study shows that momentum - dependence can be used as an effective tool to non - perturbatively determine \( c_{SW} \), and the preliminary results indicate that the non - perturbative value of \( c_{SW} \) may be greater than the value given by tadpole improvement. However, more work is needed to further verify and quantify this result.