Comparison of visual outcomes and optical aberrations after SMILE with intraoperative Kappa angle adjustments between small and large Kappa angles

Xiaojuan Lai,Xi Liu,Tao Zeng,Yi Huang,Xin Yang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-65366-w

IF: 4.6

2024-06-26

Scientific Reports

Abstract:This study compares postoperative visual outcomes and optical aberrations after Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) in patients with both small (S-Kappa: Kappa angle < 0.2 mm) and large Kappa (L-Kappa: Kappa angle ≥ 0.2 mm) angles. The evaluated aberrations include total higher-order aberrations (HOAs), horizontal coma (HC), vertical coma (VC), and spherical aberrations (SA), with procedures incorporating intraoperative Kappa angle adjustments. We retrospectively analyzed patient records undergoing SMILE utilizing linear mixed models (LMM). We assessed adjusted mean uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), Strehl ratio (SR), total HOAs, VC, and SA at pupils of 3 mm and 6 mm for both S-Kappa and L-Kappa. The disparities between S-Kappa and L-Kappa were evaluated by LMM's adjusted mean differences. The differences in optical metrics were also assessed in eyes grouped by myopia levels: low, moderate, and high. A sensitivity analysis was conducted on a threshold of Kappa angle at 0.3 mm. Eight-five patients (169 eyes) were analyzed, and no significant pre-operative difference was found in UDVA ( p = .222) or spherical equivalent ( p = .433). Post-operative differences were found in SR at 3 mm pupil size (−0.06, p = .022), total HOA 3 mm (0.15, p = .022), HC 3 mm (0.04, p = .042), VC 3 mm and 6 mm (−0.08, p = .041; 0.04, p = .041). The stratified analysis for high myopia revealed significant differences in UDVA (−0.04, p = .037), HC 3 mm (0.07, p = .03), VC 6 mm (−0.21, p = .001), and SA 3 mm and 6 mm (0.07, p = .037; −0.09, p = .037). Sensitivity analysis showed no significant difference using a 0.3 mm Kappa threshold. While some optical aberrations exhibited statistical differences between S-Kappa and L-Kappa, their clinical significance is limited. Thus, a large Kappa angle might not substantially influence post-operative optical aberrations when intraoperative Kappa angle adjustments are implemented.

multidisciplinary sciences

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the influence of different sizes of Kappa angle (the deviation between the visual axis and the pupil central axis) on postoperative visual effects and optical aberrations during Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) for myopia and myopic astigmatism. Specifically, the study aims to compare the differences in Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UDVA), Strehl Ratio (SR), Higher - Order Aberrations (HOAs), Horizontal Coma (HC), Vertical Coma (VC) and Spherical Aberrations (SA) between patients with a smaller Kappa angle (< 0.2 mm) and those with a larger Kappa angle (≥ 0.2 mm) after surgery, and to evaluate whether these differences are clinically significant. The study retrospectively analyzed the medical record data of 85 patients (169 eyes) and used Linear Mixed Models (LMM) to evaluate the adjusted mean differences. In addition, the study also carried out stratified analysis according to the degree of myopia (mild, moderate, high) and performed sensitivity analysis to verify the influence of the Kappa angle threshold (0.3 mm) on the results. The main findings include: - In the entire sample, for a 3 - mm pupil diameter, there are statistically significant differences in Strehl ratio, total higher - order aberrations, horizontal coma and vertical coma between the small Kappa angle group and the large Kappa angle group, but these differences may not be clinically significant. - For high - myopia patients, the large Kappa angle group shows significant differences in UDVA, horizontal coma at a 3 - mm pupil diameter, vertical coma at a 6 - mm pupil diameter, and spherical aberrations at 3 - mm and 6 - mm pupil diameters, but these differences are also likely not clinically significant. - Sensitivity analysis shows that when the Kappa angle threshold is set to 0.3 mm, the differences between the two groups are not statistically significant. Overall, this study explored the influence of Kappa angle size on optical aberrations after SMILE surgery and pointed out that in the case of intraoperative Kappa angle adjustment, a larger Kappa angle may not significantly affect postoperative optical aberrations. This provides an important reference for surgical planning for patients with different Kappa angles in clinical practice.

Comparison of visual outcomes and optical aberrations after SMILE with intraoperative Kappa angle adjustments between small and large Kappa angles

Higher-order aberrations and visual quality after incision lenticule extraction surgery with intraoperative angle kappa adjustments between small and large kappa patients: A 2-year follow-up

An Analysis of Visual Quality after SMILE Surgery

Comparison of visual results and higher-order aberrations after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE): high myopia vs. mild to moderate myopia

Differences in ocular high order aberrations before and after small incision lenticule extraction for correction of myopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Effect of Keratometric Astigmatism on Visual Outcomes Following Small Incision Lenticule Extraction

Comparison of Early Visual Quality in Patients with Moderate Myopia Using Different Optical Zones in Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE)

The comparison of visual outcomes, aberrations, and Bowman’s layer micro-distortions after femtosecond laser small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for the correction of high and moderate myopia and myopic astigmatism

Comparison of objective visual quality between SMILE and FS-LASIK in moderate-to-high myopia

Short-term Evaluation of Visual Quality, Amplitude of Accommodation, and Stereoacuity Between Patients with Moderate-to-High Myopia Who Underwent ICLV4c Implantation and SMILE.

Long-term Visual Quality after Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) and Laser Assisted Subepithelial Keratomileusis (LASEK) for Low Myopia

Matched comparison of corneal higher order aberrations induced by SMILE to femtosecond assisted LASIK and to PRK in correcting moderate and high myopia: 3.00mm vs. 6.00mm

Comparative study of wave-front aberration and corneal Asphericity after SMILE and LASEK for myopia: a short and long term study

Visual Outcomes after Small Incision Lenticule Extraction and Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK for High Myopia.

Comparison of Corneal Higher-Order Aberrations Following Topography-Guided LASIK and SMILE for Myopic Correction: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Long-Term Observation of Higher-Order Aberrations and Microdistortions in Bowman’s Layer after Small Incision Lenticule Extraction for the Correcting Myopia with Spherical Equivalent Higher Than −9.0 Diopters

Comparison of Postoperative Visual Quality after SMILE and LASEK for High Myopia: A 1-Year Outcome.

Comparison of Postoperative Safety, Efficacy, and Visual Quality after SMILE for Myopic Patients with Different Corneal Thicknesses

Comparison of visual quality of SMILE surgery and wavefront-guided LASIK surgery in treating myopia

Comparative Analysis of Corneal Higher-Order Aberrations after Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis, Photorefractive Keratectomy, and Small Incision Lenticule Extraction with Correlations to Change in Myopic Q-Value and Spherical Equivalent with and without Astigmatism

Comparison of Efficacy and Visual Outcomes after SMILE and FS-LASIK for the Correction of High Myopia with the Sum of Myopia and Astigmatism from -10.00 to -14.00 Dioptres.