Time and the Mind/Body Problem: A Quantum Perspective

Jean Schneider
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.quant-ph/9707056
1997-07-30
Abstract:The Semiotic Interpretation (SI) of QM pushes further the Von Neumann point of view that `experience only makes statements of this type: an observer has made a certain observation; and never any like this: a physical quantity has a certain value.' The supposition that the observables of a system `possess' objective values is purely idealistic. According to the SI view, the state- vector collapse cannot result from the Schroedinger evolution of a system (even with its environment), but only from the empirical production of a mathematical symbol, irreducible to the quantum level. The production of a symbol always takes some time. Thus the state-vector collapse cannot be instantaneous (Schneider 1994), a specific prediction of the present model. From this interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, the appearances of the body are the result of state-vector collapses of several types, i.e. the production of different kinds of symbols. In fact the universe of symbols is very rich: a symbol can have a conceptual `value' (like in physics and then give rise to a measurement), or other qualitative values (like in many human behaviors). In the latter case, the Semiotic Interpretation of QM gives a way to understand how a mental representation can modify the state of the body.
Quantum Physics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: to re - examine the Mind/Body Problem from the perspective of quantum mechanics, especially to explore whether the mind can be regarded as a "derivative" of the physical body, and how quantum theory affects our understanding of this problem. Specifically, the author Jean Schneider raises the following key issues: 1. **Mind - Body Problem and Physical Objects**: - The author believes that since we can study the human body by means of physics, the Mind - Body Problem can also be regarded as part of the broader Mind/Matter Problem. - However, the concept of the nature of objects in modern quantum mechanics is problematic, which may require the views of cognitive science to be re - examined. The author questions whether the mind should be regarded as a "derivative" of the physical body. 2. **Time and the Present Moment**: - The author points out that there is no concept in physics that can describe the "present" moment. Only in the symbolic dimension of language can "present" be expressed. - Without accepting the non - material concept of "meaning", it is impossible to explain the existence of "now" or the current instant. This is crucial for understanding the totality of human experience. 3. **The Measurement Problem in Quantum Mechanics**: - The author discusses two types of evolution in quantum mechanics: S - evolution (the deterministic evolution described by the Schrödinger equation) and R - evolution (the collapse of the state vector caused by measurement). The contradiction between the two is a key problem in the interpretation of quantum mechanics. - The author proposes that R - evolution is actually a Speech Act, that is, the generation of symbols, rather than a physical phenomenon independent of the observer. 4. **The Quantum Model of the Mind - Body Relationship**: - The author explores the possibility of how mental representations change the body state. For example, when a person decides to raise his hand, the global representation of this action is not a detailed physical description, but is achieved through the generation of a series of symbols. - The author also puts forward a hypothesis that mental symbols can change the body state in the sense of quantum state - vector collapse, such as phenomena like blushing. In summary, the core problem of this paper is to explore how the perspective of quantum mechanics can help us re - understand the Mind - Body Problem, and proposes a new quantum - psychological model in which mental representations can affect the body state through the generation of symbols.