Abstract:The commercial and operations planning in airlines has traditionally been a hierarchical process starting with flight schedule design, followed by fleet assignment, aircraft rotation planning and finally the crew scheduling. The hierarchical planning approach has a drawback that the optimal solution for a planning phase higher in hierarchy may either be infeasible for the subsequent phase or may lead to a sub‐optimal overall solution. In this paper, we solve a profit‐maximizing integrated planning model for clean‐sheet "rotated" schedule design with flight re‐time option and crew scheduling for a low‐cost carrier (LCC) in an emerging market. While the aircraft rotation problem has been traditionally modeled in the literature as a daily routing of individual aircraft for maintenance requirement, in this work we address the requirement of planned aircraft rotations as part of schedule design for LCCs. The planned aircraft routing is important in our case to create as many via‐flights as possible due to the underserved nature of the emerging market. We solve this large‐scale integer‐programming problem using two approaches – Benders Decomposition and Lagrangian Relaxation. For Lagrangian Relaxation, we exploit the special structure of our problem and intuitive understanding behind the Lagrangian duals to develop a multiplier adjustment approach to find an improved lower bound of integrated model solution. The crew‐pairing sub‐problem is solved using column generation through multi‐label shortest path algorithm followed by branch‐and‐price for integer solution. We test our solution methodology on a flight universe of 378 unique flights for different problem sizes by varying the number of aircraft available for operations. Our computational results show that within a reasonable run time of few hours both the approaches, Benders Decomposition and Lagrangian Relaxation, are successful in finding lower bounds of the integrated model solution, which are higher than the solution of traditional hierarchical approach by 0.5%–2.5%. We find Lagrangian Relaxation methodology to usually attain an improved solution faster than the Benders Decomposition approach, particularly for large‐scale problems.

Airline Crew Scheduling Using Potts Mean Field Techniques

Airline Crew Pairing Optimization Framework for Large Networks with Multiple Crew Bases and Hub-and-Spoke Subnetworks

A Novel Column Generation Heuristic for Airline Crew Pairing Optimization with Large-scale Complex Flight Networks

Scheduling Fmss Based On A Hybrid Petri Net Framework

An MCTS-Based Solution Approach to Solve Large-Scale Airline Crew Pairing Problems

Airport Ground Movement Optimization Revisited: Coupling Airport Runway Spacing to Multi-Objective Routing and Scheduling Through Genetic Algorithms

On Initializing Airline Crew Pairing Optimization for Large-scale Complex Flight Networks

A Heuristic Approach to Greener Airport Ground Movement

A Heuristic Algorithm for Solving Crew Rostering Problem

Integrated Short-Haul Airline Crew Scheduling Using Multiobjective Optimization Genetic Algorithms

Formation and Routing of Worker Teams for Airport Ground Handling Operations: A Branch-and-Price-and-Check Approach

Routing and Scheduling in Multigraphs with Time Constraints—A Memetic Approach for Airport Ground Movement

Aircraft routing and crew pairing: updated algorithms at Air France

Integrated Optimization Approach to Metro Crew Scheduling and Rostering

Parallel Problem Solving from Nature - PPSN VIII

A Branch-Price-Cut-And-Switch Approach for Optimizing Team Formation and Routing for Airport Baggage Handling Tasks with Stochastic Travel Times

A Lagrangian relaxation approach based on a time-space-state network for railway crew scheduling

Optimize railway crew scheduling by using modified bacterial foraging algorithm

Deep-learning-based partial pricing in a branch-and-price algorithm for personalized crew rostering

Integrated commercial and operations planning model for schedule design, aircraft rotation and crew scheduling in airlines

Using Machine Learning to Include Planners' Preferences in Railway Crew Scheduling Optimization