Women's attitudes towards disclosure of genetic information in pregnancy with varying levels of penetrance

Vitalia Libman,Michal Macarov,Yechiel Friedlander,Drorith Hochner‐Celnikier,Yishai Sompolinsky,Uri P. Dior,Michael Osovsky,Lina Basel‐Salmon,Arnon Wiznitzer,Yehuda Neumark,Vardiella Meiner,Ayala Frumkin,Hagit Hochner,Shiri Shkedi‐Rafid
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.6518
2024-01-16
Prenatal Diagnosis
Abstract:Background Chromosomal‐microarray‐analysis (CMA) may reveal susceptibility‐loci (SL) of varied penetrance for autism‐spectrum‐disorder (ASD) and other neurodevelopmental conditions. Attitudes of women/parents to disclosure of SL during pregnancy are understudied. Methods A multiple‐choice questionnaire was distributed to postpartum women. Data were collected on women's interest to receive prenatal genetic information with various levels of penetrance. Results Women's (n = 941) disclosure choices were dependent on the magnitude of risk: approximately 70% supported disclosure of either full or 40% penetrance, 53% supported disclosure at a 20% risk threshold, and 40% supported disclosure at 10% or less. Although most women supported, rejected or were indecisive about disclosure consistently across all risk levels, nearly one‐quarter (24%) varied their responses based on penetrance, and this was associated with religiosity, education, parity and concern about fetal health (p‐values <0.04). Among those who varied their choices, the risk threshold was lower among secular women (20%) than among ultraorthodox women (40%). In a multivariable analysis, ultraorthodox women were much less likely to vary their choices on ASD disclosure compared with secular women (aOR = 0.37, p
genetics & heredity,obstetrics & gynecology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?