Abstract:High-order Godunov methods for gas dynamics have become a standard tool for simulating different classes of astrophysical flows. Their accuracy is mostly determined by the spatial interpolant used to reconstruct the pair of Riemann states at cell interfaces and by the Riemann solver that computes the interface fluxes. In most Godunov-type methods, these two steps can be treated independently, so that many different schemes can in principle be built from the same numerical framework. Because astrophysical simulations often test out the limits of what is feasible with the computational resources available, it is essential to find the scheme that produces the numerical solution with the desired accuracy at the lowest computational cost. However, establishing the best combination of numerical options in a Godunov-type method to be used for simulating a complex hydrodynamic problem is a nontrivial task. In fact, formally more accurate schemes do not always outperform simpler and more diffusive methods, especially if sharp gradients are present in the flow. For this work, we used our fully compressible Seven-League Hydro SLH ) code to test the accuracy of six reconstruction methods and three approximate Riemann solvers on two- and three-dimensional (2D and 3D) problems involving subsonic flows only. We considered Mach numbers in the range from $10^ $ to $10^ $, which are characteristic of many stellar and geophysical flows. In particular, we considered a well-posed, 2D, Kelvin--Helmholtz instability problem and a 3D turbulent convection zone that excites internal gravity waves in an overlying stable layer. Although the different combinations of numerical methods converge to the same solution with increasing grid resolution for most of the quantities analyzed here, we find that (i) there is a spread of almost four orders of magnitude in computational cost per fixed accuracy between the methods tested in this study, with the most performant method being a combination of a low-dissipation Riemann solver and a sextic reconstruction scheme; (ii) the low-dissipation solver always outperforms conventional Riemann solvers on a fixed grid when the reconstruction scheme is kept the same; (iii) in simulations of turbulent flows, increasing the order of spatial reconstruction reduces the characteristic dissipation length scale achieved on a given grid even if the overall scheme is only second order accurate; (iv) reconstruction methods based on slope-limiting techniques tend to generate artificial, high-frequency acoustic waves during the evolution of the flow; and (v) unlimited reconstruction methods introduce oscillations in the thermal stratification near the convective boundary, where the entropy gradient is steep.

Benchmarking the accuracy of higher-order particle methods in geodynamic models of transient flow

Numerical Investigation of Particle Dynamic Behaviours in Geophysical Flows Considering Solid-Fluid Interaction

A new formulation for coupled magma/mantle dynamics

Benchmark computations of dynamic poroelasticity

Numerical Simulation of Reactive Fluid Flow on Unstructured Meshes

Particle Methods for Heat Transfer in Fractured Media

Accelerating discrete particle simulation of particle-fluid systems

Modeling of Dynamic Rock–Fluid Interaction Using Coupled 3-D Discrete Element and Lattice Boltzmann Methods

A Discrete Element Methods-Based Model for Particulate Deposition and Rebound in Gas Turbines

Benefits of Global Sensitivity Analysis and Reduced Order Modeling for Basin-Scale Process Simulations

A comparison study of spatial and temporal schemes for flow and transport problems in fractured media with large parameter contrasts on small length scales

Lattice Boltzmann method/computational fluid dynamics-discrete element method applications for transport and packing of non-spherical particles during geo-energy explorations: A review

Performance of high-order Godunov-type methods in simulations of astrophysical low Mach number flows

A stable discontinuous Galerkin method for linear elastodynamics in 3D geometrically complex media using physics based numerical fluxes

Increasing accuracy of 3-D geomechanical-numerical models

Well-balanced treatment of gravity in astrophysical fluid dynamics simulations at low Mach numbers

Physical Modeling and Numerical Studies of Three-dimensional Non-equilibrium Multi-temperature Flows.

A Multi-Field and Fluid–solid Coupling Method for Porous Media Based on DEM-PNM

Hard-sphere/pseudo-particle modelling (HS-PPM) for efficient and scalable molecular simulation of dilute gaseous flow and transport

Fluid-particle flow and validation using two-way-coupled mesoscale SPH-DEM