Optimal Scheduling of Source–Load Synergy in Rural Integrated Energy Systems Considering Complementary Biogas–Wind–Solar Utilization

Xing Long,Hongqi Liu,Tao Wu,Tongle Ma

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en17133066

IF: 3.2

2024-06-21

Energies

Abstract:To address the issues of the low usage efficiency and illogical structure in rural regions, this study builds a rural integrated energy system (RIES) that incorporates the complementary use of biogas, wind, and light. For resolving the RIES optimum-low-carbon-economic-dispatch problem, a source–load-cooperative optimal-dispatch strategy is proposed. Firstly, a multi-energy integrated demand response (IDR) model based on time-of-use tariffs and time-varying biogas costs is established on the demand side. Secondly, power-to-gas devices are added on the supply side to optimize the system's electricity–gas-coupling relationship and increase the wind power output space. Thirdly, an RIES-oriented carbon-trading model is constructed by considering the actual carbon emissions of gas loads and the stepped-carbon-trading mechanism. Finally, an optimal-dispatch model is built with the objective function of reducing the total energy cost, wind abandonment cost, IDR cost, and carbon emission cost, while the problem is transformed into a mixed-integer linear problem and solved using CPLEX 12.9. By setting up four scenarios for example analysis, the results show that on typical days in spring, summer, autumn, and winter, the total operating costs of the stepped-carbon-trading system (Scenario 1), taking into account the source-side power-to-gas (P2G) device and the load-side IDR, are reduced by 12.25%, 11.25%, 12.42%, and 11.56%, respectively, compared to the system without the introduction of the IDR (Scenario 3). In contrast to the system that lacks a P2G device at the source end (Scenario 2), the overall costs are decreased by 4.97%, 3.07%, 5.02%, and 5.36%, but the wind power consumption rates are increased by 11.63%, 7.93%, 11.54%, and 11.65%, respectively. Stepped emission trading (Scenario 1) reduces the total operating costs by 5.12%, 3.15%, 5.21%, and 6.84%, respectively, while reducing the biogas costs by 9.75%, 7.74%, 9.67%, and 9.57%, respectively, in comparison to traditional emission trading (Scenario 4). The example results demonstrate the economics, effectiveness, and reliability of a stepped-carbon-trading system with an integrated P2G load-side energy demand response.

energy & fuels

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper attempts to solve the problems of low energy utilization efficiency and unreasonable structure in rural integrated energy systems (RIES). Specifically, the study constructs a rural integrated energy system with complementary use of biogas, wind energy and solar energy, and proposes a source - load collaborative optimal dispatch strategy to solve the optimal low - carbon economic dispatch problem of RIES. The following are the main problems in this paper and their solutions:

### Main Problems
1. **Low Rural Energy Utilization Efficiency**: The energy structure in rural areas is unreasonable, the energy utilization efficiency is low, the supply is unstable, and the planning and distribution are unreasonable.
2. **Low - Carbon Economic Dispatch Problem**: Traditional economic dispatch methods fail to fully consider low - carbon goals, resulting in high carbon emissions and high economic costs.

### Solutions
1. **Construct a Rural Integrated Energy System with Multi - Energy Complementarity**:
- **Demand Side**: Based on time - of - use electricity prices and time - varying biogas costs, a multi - energy integrated demand response (IDR) model was established.
- **Supply Side**: Added power - to - gas (P2G) equipment to optimize the electricity - gas coupling relationship of the system and increase the accommodation space for wind power.
- **Carbon Trading Mechanism**: Considering the actual carbon emissions of gas loads and the stepped carbon trading mechanism, a carbon trading model for RIES was constructed.

2. **Establish an Optimal Dispatch Model**:
- **Objective Function**: Reduce the total energy cost, wind power curtailment cost, IDR cost and carbon emission cost.
- **Model Solution**: Transform the problem into a mixed - integer linear problem and use the CPLEX 12.9 solver to solve it.

### Experimental Results
By setting four scenarios for case analysis, the results show that on typical days in spring, summer, autumn and winter, compared with the system without IDR (Scenario 3), the total operating cost of the stepped - carbon - trading system with IDR and P2G equipment (Scenario 1) is reduced by 12.25%, 11.25%, 12.42% and 11.56% respectively. Compared with the system lacking P2G equipment (Scenario 2), the overall cost is reduced by 4.97%, 3.07%, 5.02% and 5.36% respectively, and the wind power accommodation rate is increased by 11.63%, 7.93%, 11.54% and 11.65% respectively. Compared with the traditional emission trading (Scenario 4), the total operating cost of the stepped - emission - trading (Scenario 1) is reduced by 5.12%, 3.15%, 5.21% and 6.84% respectively, and the biogas cost is reduced by 9.75%, 7.74%, 9.67% and 9.57% respectively.

### Conclusions
The research results show that the stepped - carbon - trading system combined with P2G equipment and demand - side energy demand response has significant advantages in terms of economy, effectiveness and reliability, and can effectively reduce the operating cost and carbon emissions of rural integrated energy systems and improve the wind power accommodation rate.

### Formula Summary
1. **Relationship between Biogas Production and Temperature**:
\[
E_{\text{biogas}} = m |T_Z - T_0| + n
\]
where \( E_{\text{biogas}} \) is the biogas production per unit time; \( T_Z \) and \( T_0 \) are the actual and optimal reaction temperatures respectively; \( m \) and \( n \) are parameters obtained by fitting data.

2. **Fourier's Law of Heat Conduction**:
\[
q_x = -r \frac{dT}{dy}
\]
where \( q_x \) is the heat flux density through unit area (W·m\(^{-2}\)); \( r \) is the thermal conductivity of the biogas fermenter wall (W·m\(^{-1}\)·°C\(^{-1}\)); \( T \) is the temperature at which heat transfer occurs in the fermenter (°C); \( y \) is the position coordinate where heat transfer occurs in the fermenter (m).

3. **Heat Conduction Model Inside and Outside the Fermenter Wall**:
\[
\begin{cases}
\frac{T_W - T_Z}{R_{\text{in}} + \frac{R_w}{2}} + Q_R = C_Z \frac{dT_