A randomized multicenter trial of a chronic disease management intervention for decompensated cirrhosis. The Australian Liver Failure (ALFIE) trial

Alan J Wigg,Sumudu Narayana,Richard J Woodman,Leon A. Adams,Rachel Wundke,Mohamed A Chinnaratha,Bin Chen,Gary Jeffrey,Joan-Lee Plummer,Vanessa Sheehan,Edmund Tse,Joanne Morgan,Dep Huynh,Margery Milner,Jeffrey Stewart,Golo Ahlensteil,Asma Baig,Billingsley Kaambwa,Kate Muller,Jeyamani Ramachandran
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/hep.0000000000000862
IF: 17.298
2024-03-27
Hepatology
Abstract:Background and aims: Improving the care of decompensated cirrhosis (DC) is a significant clinical challenge. The primary aim of this trial was to assess the efficacy of a chronic disease management (CDM) model to reduce liver-related emergency admissions (LREA). Secondary aims were to assess model effects on quality-of-care and patient reported outcomes. Approach and results: Study design was a two-year, multicenter, randomized controlled study with 1:1 allocation of a CDM model versus usual care. The study setting involved both tertiary and community care. Participants were randomly allocated following a DC admission. The intervention was a multifaceted CDM model coordinated by a liver nurse. 147 participants (Intervention=75, Control=71) were recruited with a median MELD score of 19. For the primary outcome, there was no difference in the overall LREA rate for the Intervention group versus Control group (IRR 0.89; 95% CI 0.53-1.50, p =0.666) or in actuarial survival (HR=1.14; 95% CI 0.66-1.96, p =0.646). However, there was a reduced risk of LREA due to encephalopathy in the Intervention versus Control group (Hazard ratio=1.87; 95% CI 1.18-2.96, p =0.007). Significant improvement in quality-of-care measures was seen for performance of bone density ( p =<0.001), vitamin D testing ( p =<0.001) and HCC surveillance adherence ( p =0.050). For assessable participants (44/74 Intervention, 32/71 Controls) significant improvements in patient-reported outcomes at 3 months were seen for self-management ability and quality of life as assessed by visual analog scale ( p =0.044). Conclusions: This CDM intervention did not reduce overall LREA events and may not be effective in DC for this endpoint.
gastroenterology & hepatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?